1. Brown E. ‘Duh’ science: Why researchers spend so much time proving the obvious.

Los Angeles Times [Internet]. 2011 May 28 [cited 2016 Oct 31]. Available from: http://

2. Warburton AL, Shepherd JP. Effectiveness of toughened glassware in terms of reducing injury in bars: a randomised controlled trial. Inj Prev. 2000 Mar 1;6(1):36-40.

  • 3. Segerstrom SC, Miller GE. Psychological Stress and the Human Immune System: A Meta-Analytic Study of 30 Years of Inquiry. Psychol Bull. 2004 Jul;130(4):601-30.
  • 4. Trochim W. EVALTALK. Archives of This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it 1998.
  • 5. Coffman J. Michael Scriven on the Differences Between Evaluation and Social Science Research. Eval Exch Period Emerg Strateg Eval. 2003 Winter/2004;9(4).
  • 6. Mathison S. What is the difference between evaluation and research—and why do we care? In: Smith NL, Brandon PR, editors. Fundamental Issues in Evaluation. New York, London: The Guilford Press; 2008. pp. 183-96.
  • 7. Burgess R. New Principles of Best Practice in Clinical Audit. London, New York: Radcliffe Publishing; 2011. 215 pp.
  • 8. White M. RCTs—The Holy Grail of Arts in Health? [Internet]. Centre for Medical Humanities. 2013 [cited 2016 Oct 31]. Available from: http://centreformedicalhumanities. org/rcts-the-holy-grail-of-arts-in-health/.
  • 9. Parkinson C. arts and health blog: Fiction-Non-Fiction (revisited) [Internet]. arts and health blog. 2015 [cited 2016 Oct 31]. Available from: http://artsforhealthmmu.
  • 10. Medical Research Council. A framework for development and evaluation of RCTs for complex interventions to improve health. London: Medical Research Council; 2000 Apr.
  • 11. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337(sep29 1):a1655-a1655.
  • 12. Craig P, Rahm-Hallberg I, Britten N, Borglin G, Meyer G, Kopke S, et al. Researching Complex Interventions in Health: The State of the Art. BMC Health Serv Res.
  • 2016; 16(1):101.
  • 13. Rosenfield PL. The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences. Soc Sci Med 1992 Dec;35( 11): 1343-57.
  • 14. Aboelela SW, Larson E, Bakken S, Carrasquillo O, Formicola A, Glied SA, et al. Defining Interdisciplinary Research: Conclusions from a Critical Review of the Literature. Health Serv Res. 2007 Feb;42(1 Pt 1):329-46.
< Prev   CONTENTS   Source   Next >