References

Alderson, J. C. (Ed.). (1984). Evaluation: Language practical papers in English language education. Oxford: Pergamon.

Alderson, J. C. (1992). Guidelines for the evaluation of language education. In J. C. Alderson & A. Baretta (Eds.), Evaluating second language education (pp. 274-304). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Alderson, J. C., & Baretta, A. (Eds.). (1992). Evaluating second language education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Allwright, R. (2006). Six promising directions in applied linguistics. In S. Gieve & I. K. Miller (Eds.), Understanding the language classroom (pp. 11-17). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Baretta, A. (1986). Program-fair for language teaching evaluation. TESOL Quarterly, 20(3), 431-444.

Baretta, A. (1990). The program evaluator: The ESL researcher without portfolio. Applied Linguistics, 11(1), 1-15.

Baretta, A., & Davies, A. (1985). Evaluation of the Bangalore project. English Language Teaching Journal, 39(2), 121-127.

Bell, D. M. (2003). Method and postmethod: Are they really so incompatible? TESOL Quarterly, 37(2), 325-336.

Brumfit, C. (1980). Being interdisciplinary - Some problems facing applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 158-164.

Butler, G. (2009). The design of a postgraduate test of academic literacy: Accommodating student and supervisor expectations. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 27(3), 291-300. (Special issue: Assessing and developing academic literacy, J. Geldenhuys (Ed.)).

Carroll, J. B. (1960). Wanted: A research basis for educational policy on foreign language teaching. Reprinted from Harvard educational review, 30(2), 128-140. In F. Smolinski (Ed.), Landmarks of American language and linguistics (pp. 159-167). Washington, DC: United States Information Agency.

Chomsky, N. (1966). Linguistic theory. Reprinted from R. Mead (Ed.) 1966, Language teaching: Broader contexts. In F. Smolinski (Ed.), Landmarks of American language and linguistics (pp. 262-266). Washington: United States Information Agency.

Clement, R., Gardner, R. C., & Smythe, P. C. (1977). Motivational variables in second language acquisition: A study of francophones learning English. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 9(2), 123-133.

Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. London: Longman.

Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (Eds.). (2000a). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. London: Routledge.

Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2000b). Introduction. Multiliteracies: The beginnings of an idea. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 3-8). London: Routledge.

Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2000c). Designs for social futures. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 203-234). London: Routledge.

Corder, S. P. (1972). Problems and solutions in applied linguistics. In J. Qvistgaard, H. Schwarz & H. Spang-Hanssen (Eds.), Applied linguistics: Problems and solutions (pp. 1-23). Vol. III of the Proceedings of the Association Internationale de Linguistique Appliquee Third Congress, Copenhagen. Heidelberg: Julius Groos Verlag.

Corder, S. P. (1978). Pure and applied research in linguistics: Is the difference merely one of motivation? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1(2), 77-90.

Davison, C. (2014). Writing in crooked lines: An analysis of writing development of neo-literate Bambara women. PhD thesis, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein.

De Graaff, A. H. (1967). Introduction to psychology: Syllabus. s.1.: Trinity Christian College.

De Graaff, A.H. (1968). The educational ministry ofthe church. s.1.: The Craig Press.

Dooyeweerd, H. (1955). A new critique of theoretical thought (Vol. 1-3). Philadelphia: The Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Company.

Du Plessis, C., Steyn, S., & Weideman, A. (2013). Towards a construct for assessing high level language ability in grade 12. Report to the council for quality assurance in general and further education and training (Umalusi) on home language examinations. Bloemfontein: ICELDA.

Foster, P. (1998). A classroom perspective on the negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 19(1), 1-23.

Habte, A. (2001). The development ofsupplementary materialsforEnglish language teaching in a scarce resource environment: An action research study, mini-dissertation. Belville: University of the Western Cape.

Hall, J. K., & Eggington, W. G. (Eds.). (2000). The sociopolitics of English language teaching. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Hong, T. P. N. (2013). A dynamic usage-based approach to second language teaching. Ph.D thesis, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.

Horwitz, E. K. (1987). Surveying student beliefs about language learning. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 119-129). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice/ Hall.

Hosenfeld, C. (1974). Cora’s view of learning grammar. Canadian Modern Language Review, 35(4), 602-607.

Hosenfeld, C. (1976). Learning about learning: Discovering our students’ strategies. Foreign Language Annals, 9(2), 117-129.

Ingram, E. (1978). Applied linguistics, linguistic research and the empirical model. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1(2), 37-53.

Janks, H. (2000). Domination, access, diversity and design: A synthesis for critical literacy education. Educational Review, 52(2), 175-186.

Kalsbeek, L. (1975). Contours ofa Christianphilosophy. Amsterdam: Buijten and Schipperheijn.

Kress, G. (2000). Design and transformation: New theories of meaning. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 153-161). London: Routledge.

Kroes, H. (1991a). EvaluationoftheEasing intoEnglishproject. Bloemfontein: UrbanFoundation.

Kroes, H. (1991b). Die evaluering van taalonderrig: ’n Voorbeeld uit die praktyk. Journal for Language Teaching, 25(3), 30-40.

Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From method to postmethod. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Le, P. Loan. (2011). Assessing academic literacy of first year Vietnamese students: How appropriate is the TALL? M.A. dissertation, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.

Lea, M. (2004). Academic literacies: A pedagogy for course design. Studies in Higher Education, 29(6), 739-756.

Lepota, B., & Weideman, A. (2002). Our ways of learning language. SAALT Journal for Language Teaching, 36(3 and 4), 206-219.

Lightbown, P. M. (1985). Great expectations: Second-language acquisition research and classroom teaching. Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 173-189.

Lillis, T. (2003). Student writing as ‘academic literacies’: Drawing on Bakhtin to move from critique to design. Language and Education, 17(3), 192-207.

Lynch, B. K. (1996). Languageprogram evaluation. Theory andpractice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mackay, R. (1994). Undertaking ESL/EFL programme review for accountability and improvement. English Language Teaching Journal, 48(2), 142-149.

Malmberg, B. (1967). Applied linguistics. International Review of AppliedLinguistics, 5, 1-2.

Moskowitz, G. (1976). The classroom interaction of outstanding foreign language teachers. Foreign Language Annals, 9(2), 135-157.

Paltridge, B., & Phakiti, A. (2010). Continuum companion to research methods in applied linguistics. London: Continuum.

Patterson, R., & Weideman, A. (2013a). The typicality of academic discourse and its relevance for constructs of academic literacy. Journal for Language Teaching, 47(1), 107-123. doi:http:// dx.doi.org/10.4314/jlt.v47i1.5.

Patterson, R., & Weideman, A. (2013b). The refinement of a construct for tests of academic literacy. Journal for Language Teaching, 47(1), 125-151. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/jlt.v47i1.6.

Pennycook, A. (1999). Introduction: Critical approaches to TESOL. TESOL Quarterly (Special topic issue: Critical approaches in TESOL), 33(3), 329-348.

Pennycook, A. (2000). The social politics and the cultural politics of language classrooms. In J. K. Hall & W. G. Eggington (Eds.), The sociopolitics of English language teaching (pp. 89-103). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Pennycook, A. (2004). Critical applied linguistics. In A. Davies & C. Elder (Eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 784-807). Oxford: Blackwell.

Qvistgaard, J., Schwarz, H. & Spang-Hanssen, H. (Eds.). (1972). Applied linguistics: Problems and solutions: Proceedings of the Association Internationale de Linguistique Appliquee, Third Congress, Copenhagen (Vol. III). Heidelberg: Julius Groos Verlag.

Ramani, E., Modiba, M. & Joseph, M. (2006). Variable competencies in students’ bilingual academic writing (in English and Sesotho sa Leboa) in a dual-medium BA degree. 2006 SAALA Conference, Durban, 6 July.

Rea-Dickens, P., & Germaine, K. (1992). Language teaching evaluation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rosen, H. (1982). Sociolinguistics and the teaching of the mother tongue. Gramma, 6, 49-61.

Roulet, E. (1975). Linguistic theory, linguistic description and language teaching. London: Longman.

Santema, J. H. (1978). Modellen in de wetenschap en de toepassing ervan. Delft: Delft University Press.

Schuurman, E. (1972). Techniek en toekomst: Confrontatie met wijsgerige beschouwingen. Assen: Van Gorcum.

Seliger, H. W., & Long, M. H. (Eds.). (1983). Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition. Rowley: Newbury House.

Smolinski, F. (Ed.). (1985). Landmarks of American language and linguistics. Washington, DC: United States Information Agency.

Spolsky, B. (1970). Linguistics and language pedagogy - applications or implications? In J. E. Alatis (Ed.), Linguistics and the teaching of standard English to speakers of other languages (Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics) (pp. 143-155). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

The New London Group. (2000). A pedagogy of multiliteracies. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 9-37). London: Routledge.

Van der Slik, F., & Weideman, A. (2005). The refinement of a test of academic literacy. Per Linguam, 21(1), 23-35.

Van der Slik, F., & Weideman, A. (2007). Testing academic literacy over time: Is the academic literacy of first year students deteriorating? Ensovoort, 11(2), 126-137.

Van der Slik, F., & Weideman, A. (2008). Measures of improvement in academic literacy. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 26(3), 363-378.

Van der Slik, F., & Weideman, A. (2009). Revisiting test stability: Further evidence relating to the measurement of difference in performance on a test of academic literacy. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 27(3), 253-263.

Van der Slik, F., & Weideman, A. (2010). Examining bias in a test of academic literacy: Does the Test of Academic Literacy Levels (TALL) treat students from English and African language backgrounds differently? SAALT Journal for Language Teaching, 44(2), 106-118.

Van Dyk, T., & Weideman, A. (2004a). Switching constructs: On the selection of an appropriate blueprint for academic literacy assessment. SAALT Journal for Language Teaching, 35(1), 1-13.

Van Dyk, T., & Weideman, A. (2004b). Finding the right measure: From blueprint to specification to item type. SAALT Journal for Language Teaching, 35(1), 15-24.

Van Riessen, H. (1949). Filosofie en techniek. Kampen: J.H. Kok.

Van Riessen, H. (1952). Roeping enprobleem der techniek. Kampen: J.H. Kok.

Weideman, A. (1986). Linguistics: A crash coursefor students. Bloemfontein: Patmos.

Weideman, A. (2003a). Towards accountability: A point of orientation for post-modern applied linguistics in the third millennium. Literator, 24(1), 1-20.

Weideman, A. (2003b). Assessing and developing academic literacy. Per Linguam, 19(1 & 2), 55-65.

Weideman, A. (2006a). Transparency and accountability in applied linguistics. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 24(1), 71-86.

Weideman, A. (2006b). Assessing academic literacy in a task-based approach. Language Matters, 37(1), 81-101.

Weideman, A. (2007). The redefinition of applied linguistics: Modernist and postmodernist views. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 25(4), 589-605.

Weideman, A. (2009a). Beyond expression: A systematic study ofthefoundations oflinguistics. Grand Rapids: Paideia Press in association with the Reformational Publishing Project.

Weideman, A. (2009b). Constitutive and regulative conditions for the assessment of academic literacy. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 27(3), 235-251.

Weideman, A. (2011). Academic literacy tests: Design, development, piloting and refinement. SAALT Journal for Language Teaching, 45(2), 100-113.

Weideman, A. (2012). Validity and validation beyond Messick. Per Linguam, 25(2), 1-14.

Weideman, A. (2013a). Positivism and postpositivism. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (Vol. 7, pp. 4479-4485). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. doi:http://onlineli- brary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0920/abstract.

Weideman, A. (2013b). Innovation and reciprocity in applied linguistics. Literator, 35(1),1-10. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/lit.v35i1.1074.

Weideman, A., & Van der Slik, F. (2008). The stability of test design: Measuring difference in performance across several administrations of a test of academic literacy. Acta Academica, 40(1), 161-182.

Weideman, A., Pretorius, M. P., & Visser, S. F. (1988). An English language proficiency test for students of education. Test battery. Bloemfontein: University of the Free State.

Weir, C., & Roberts, J. (1994). Evaluation in ELT. Oxford: Blackwell.

Wenden, A. (1991). Learner strategiesfor learner autonomy: Planning and implementing learner training for language learners. New York: Prentice Hall.

Wenden, A., & Rubin, J. (1987). Learner strategies in language learning. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

Wesche, M. B. (1979). Learning behaviours of successful adult students on intensive language training. Canadian Modern Language Review, 35(3), 415-430.

Young, D. (2005). After 25 years, is SAALA making a difference to our research, understanding, teaching and language praxis in our multilingual society? [Keynote address] SAALA/LSSA Conference, Dikhololo, 7 July 2005. In J. Geldenhuys & B. Lepota (Eds.), Proceedings of the joint SAALA/LSSA 2005 Conference (pp. 37-65). Pretoria: SAALA.

 
Source
< Prev   CONTENTS   Source   Next >