• 1. it needs to be noted that due to criticism by international organizations such as the Eu, the council of Europe, or judicial organs, like the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) or the European Court of Justice, some of these legislation has been amended. For example in April 2014, the European Court of Justice ruled that the abrupt termination of the data protection commissioner’s term in 2011 infringed on the authority’s independence, and that the church law violated the European Convention of Human Rights. The ECHR also declared that the early removal of the former Supreme Court president in 2012 violated his rights, and also condemned Hungary for violating the freedom of expression because opposition party MP’s were sanctioned. Likewise, the 98 % retroactive tax was found to be contrary to the Convention.
  • 2. Retroactivity refers to the fact that the idea of creating a new political community (or even the adoption of a new constitution) was not part of the political campaign in the elections, and, needless to say, the principles of this new regimes were not up to political deliberation either.
  • 3. The Declaration, adopted shortly after the new government took office, was ordered to be displayed in all government facilities in Hungary. The president, the speaker ofthe parliament, the presidents ofthe Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court, the Central Bank, mayors, the ombudspersons, chief prosecutors and judges were requested in the form of a Government Resolution to follow suit. Most state institutions, such as hospitals or universities, also complied.
  • 4. This is not to argue that liberalism is necessarily multicultural, or that any form of collectivistic constitutionalism would be inherently liberal, only that these would be the most characteristic and typical commitments by Hungarian liberal public intellectuals (who, in the absence of a visible liberal party, can be identified as relevant “liberal” voices.)
  • 5. According to the concept of ethno-symbolism, nations are based on ethnic groups, where cultural cohesion is built on myths and symbols. Anthony D. Smith (1996, 1999, 2009) explains how myths are highly significant factors in nation building. Also consider John Armstrong (1982) arguing that “A most significant effect of the myth recital is to arouse an intense awareness among the group members of their ‘common fate’ ” (p. 9).
  • 6. For the concept, see Comaroff and Comaroff (2009).
  • 7. For scholarly assessments on the role of discursive action in the process of identity formation see Fox and Miller-Idriss (2008) and Wodak (2009).
  • 8. For the original theory, see Austin (1962).
  • 9. Balzacq (2010) argues that three different aspects should be considered when analyzing perlocutionary speech acts: (i) the centrality of the audience; (ii) the co-dependency of agency and context; (iii) the dispositive and structuring force of practices.
  • 10. For more on this see Vidra et al. (2012).
  • 11. According to the 2014 World economic forum Global Gender Gap Report Hungary is placed 128 out of 143 in the field of political empowerment, with a 93rd overall gender-gap rank.
< Prev   CONTENTS   Source   Next >