Amnesty International. (2016). Annual report: Hungary 2015-2016. https://www. amnesty.org/en /countries / europe-and-central-asia/hungary/report-hungary/. Accessed June 2016.
Anderson, P. (2007). Russia’s managed democracy. London Review of Books, 29(2), 2-12.
Armstrong, J. (1982). Nations before nationalism. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Balzacq, T. (2010). Securitization theory: how security problems emerge and dissolve. Milton Park, Abingdon: Routledge.
Bankuti, M., Halmai, G., Scheppele, K. L. (2012). Hungary’s illiberal turn: disabling the constitution. In: A. T. Gabor (Ed.), Constitution for a disunited nation on Hungary’s 2011 fundamental law. Budapest: CEU Press.
Blokker, P. (2013). New democracies in crisis? A comparative constitutional study of the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania and Slovakia. London and New York: Routledge.
Bozoki, A. (2011). Occupy the state: The Orban regime in Hungary. Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe, 19(3), 649-663.
Bozoki, A (2015). Broken democracy, predatory state, and nationalist populism. In: P. Krasztev & J. V. Til (Eds.), The Hungarian patient. Social opposition to an illiberal democracy. Budapest: Central European University Press.
Bugaric, B. (2014). Protecting democracy and the rule of law in the European Union: The Hungarian challenge, LSE “Europe in question”. LEQS Discussion Paper Series, No. 79, 1-44.
Chronowski, N. (2012). The new Hungarian fundamental law in the light of the European Union’s normative values. Revue Est Europa, 1(2), 111-142.
Collier, D., & Levitsky, S. (1997). Democracy with adjectives: conceptual innovation in comparative research. World Politics, 49(3), 430-451.
Comaroff, J. L., & Comaroff, J. (2009). Ethnicity, Inc. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Csillag, T., & Szelenyi, I. (2015). Drifting from liberal democracy: Traditionalist/ neoconservative ideology of managed illiberal democratic capitalism in postcommunist Europe, intersections. East European Journal of Society and Politics, 1(1), 18-48.
Eurostat. (2016). Real GDP growth rate - Volume. http://ec.europa.eu/euro stat/web/products-datasets/-/tec00115. Accessed June 2016.
Feischmidt, M., & Hervik, P. (2015). Mainstreaming the extreme: intersecting challenges from the far right in Europe, intersections. East European Journal of Society and Politics, 1(1), 3-15.
Fox, J. E., & Miller-Idriss, C. (2008) Everyday nationhood. Ethnicities, 8(4), 536-563.
Freedom House. (2015). Hungary: nations in transit. https://freedomhouse. org/report/nations-transit/2015/hungary. Accessed 1 June 2016.
Garcia, L. B. (2015). Participatory democracy and civil society in the EU. Agendasetting and institutionalisation. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Halmai, G. (2013). The rise and fall of Hungarian Constitutionalism. In: S. Benhabib, D. Cameron, A. Dolidze, G. Halmai, G. Hellmann, K. Pishchikova, R. Youngs (Eds.), The democratic disconnect citizenship and accountability in the transatlantic community (pp. 67-77). Washington, DC: Transatlantic Academy.
Halmai, G., & Scheppele, K. L. (Eds.) (2012) Opinion on Hungary’s new constitutional order: Amicus brieffor the Venice commission on the transitional provisions of the fundamental law and the Key Cardinal Laws. Princeton: Princeton University.
Hegedus, D. (2014). From front-runner’s “Euphoria” to Backmarker’s “pragmatic adhocism”? Hungary’s ten years within the European Union in a Visegrad comparison. DGAPanalyse (7). https://dgap.org/en/article/ getFullPDF/25438. Accessed 1 June 2016.
Helsinki Committee .(2014). Disrespect for European values in Hungary 2010-2014. http://helsinki.hu/wp -content/uploads/Disrespect_for_values -Nov2014.pdf. Accessed June 2016.
Hobsbawm, E. J. (1992). Nations and nationalism since 1789: programme, myth, reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hungarian Spectrum. (2009). Value structure of Hungarian society, 2009. http://hungarianspectrum.org/2009/10/13/value-structure-of-hungarian- society-2009/. Accessed June 2016.
Huntington, S. (1991) The third wave: democratization in the late twentieth century. Norman, Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press.
International Monetary Fund. (2008, October 28). IMF, EU, and World Bank line up $25 billion for Hungary. IMF Survey Online. http://www.imf.org/ external/pubs/ft/survey/so/2008/car102808b.htm. Accessed June 2016.
Jarabik, B. (2015). From Belarus to Hungary: lessons from a traditionalist revolution. In: P. Krasztev & J. V. Til (Eds.), The Hungarian patient. Social opposition to an illiberal democracy (pp. 319-324). Budapest: Central European University Press.
Jenne, E. K., & Mudde, C. (2012). Can outsiders help? Journal of Democracy, 23(3), 147-155.
Keller, T. (2010). Hungary on the world values map. Review of Sociology, 20(1), 27-51.
Kis, J. (2012). Introduction: from the 1989 constitution to the 2011 fundamental law. In: A. T. Gabor (Ed.), Constitution for a disunited nation on Hungary’s 2011 fundamental law. Budapest: CEU Press.
Knoema. (2016). World Data Atlas: Hungary - Gross Domestic Product. http:// knoema.com/atlas/Hungary/GDP. Accessed June 2016.
Kovats, E., & P5im, M. (2015). Gender as symbolic glue: the position and role of conservative and far right parties anti-gender mobilizations in Europe. Foundation for European Progressive Studies and the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.
Kovats, E., P5im, M., Tanczos, J. (2015). Beyond gender? Anti-gender mobilization and the lessons for progressives. FEPS-FES Policy Brief.
Kovacs, A., Horvath, A., Vidra, Z. (2011). The Ferry-Country between East and West: debates on modernity and Europe in Hungary. In: A. Ichijo (Ed.), Europe, nations and modernity (pp. 158-182). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kovacs, K., & Toth, G.A. (2011). Hungary’s constitutional transformation. European Constitutional Law Review, 7(2), 183-203.
Kover, A. (2015a). Captured by state and church: civil society in democratic Hungary populism. In: P. Krasztev & J. V. Til (Eds.), The Hungarian patient. Social opposition to an illiberal democracy (pp. 81-90). Budapest: Central European University Press.
Kover, A. (2015b). Timike and the Sweetie Pies: fragmented discourses about women in Hungarian public life. In: P. Krasztev & J. V. Til (Eds.), The Hungarian patient. Social opposition to an illiberal democracy. Budapest: Central European University Press.
Krasztev, P. (2015). Social responses to the “hybridization” of the political system: the case of Hungary. In: P. Krasztev & J. V. Til (Eds.), The Hungarian patient. Social opposition to an illiberal democracy. Budapest: Central European University Press.
Lambert, G. (2015). Azutan egyszer csak beutott a mennyko - interju Tolgyessy Peterrel [And then all Hell Broke loose: An interview with Peter Tolgyessy]. Figyelo Online. http://m.figyelo.hu/cikkek/427802-azutan-egyszer-csak- beutott-a-mennyko—interju-tolgyessy-peterrel. Accessed 1 June 2015.
Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2010). Competitive authoritarianism: hybrid regimes after the cold war. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Majtenyi, B. (2012). Legislative stupidities in the New Hungarian Constitution. Peace Human Rights, 1(9), 105-110.
Mansbridge, J. J., & Parkinson, J. (Eds.). (2012). Deliberative systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Melegh, A. (2006). On the East/West slope:globalization, nationalism, racism and discourses on Eastern Europe. New York: Central European University Press.
Mill, J. S. (Ed.) (1993 ). On liberty. In Utilitarianism, liberty, and representative government (pp. 69-185). London: Everyman’s Library.
Niederberger, A., & and Schink, P. (2013). Republican democracy liberty, law and politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Pap, A. L. (2014). Szemelyisegkep es alkotmanyos identitas a Nemzeti
Egyuttmukodes Rendszereben (I. resz), [Personhood and constitutional identity under the new constitution]. Kozjogi Szemle 2014(4), 1-11.
Pap, A. L. (2015a) Who are “we, the people”? Biases and preferences in the Hungarian fundamental law. In: Z. Fejes, F. Mandak, Z. Szente (Eds.), Challenges and pitfalls in the recent Hungarian constitutional development - discussing the new fundamental law of Hungary (pp. 53-75). Paris: L’Harmattan.
Pap, A. L. (2015b). Szemelyisegkep es alkotmanyos identitas a Nemzeti
Egyuttmukodes Rendszereben [Personhood and constitutional identity under the new constitution] Part II., Kozjogi Szemle, 2015(1), 1-11.
Pap, A. L. (2015c). Szemelyisegkep es alkotmanyos identitas a Nemzeti
Egyuttmukodes Rendszereben (Personhood and constitutional identity under the new constitution) Part III., Kozjogi Szemle (1).
Peto, A., & Vasali, Z. (2014, January 20). The “laboratory” called Hungary: a challenge for understanding protest movements. OpenDemocracy. https:// www.opendemocracy.net/can-europe-make-it/andrea-pet%C5%91-zolt%C3% A1n-vasali/%E2%80%98laboratory%E2%80%99-called-hungary-challenge-for- understanding. Accessed June 2016.
Pettit, P. (2013). On the people’s terms: a republican theory and model of democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pew Global. (2009, November). End of communism cheered but now with more reservations. http://www.pewglobal.org/2009/11/02/end-of-communism- cheered-but-now-with-more-reservations/. Accessed June 2016.
Racz, A. (2015). Multi-vectorialism failing? The Russia-policy of the Orban- government. Russkii Vopros (1). http://www.russkiivopros.com/?pag= one&id=619&kat=7&csl=69. Accessed June 2016.
Rupnik, J. (2012). How things went wrong. Journal of Democracy, 23(3), 132-137.
Rupnik, J., & Zielonka, J. (2013) Introduction: the state of democracy 20 years on: domestic and external factors. East European Politics and Societies, 27(1), 3-25.
Sarlo, A. W., & Otarashvili, M. (2013, July). Can the EU rescue democracy in Hungary? Foreign Policy Research Institute. https://www.files.ethz.ch/ isn/167427/Wiktorek_Otarashvili_-_EU_and_Democracy_in_Hungary. pdf. Accessed June 2016.
Scheppele, K. L. (2013). The rule of law and the Frankenstate: why governance checklists do not work. Governance, 26(4), 559-562.
Scheppele, K L. (2014, May 6). Hungary and the end of politics. The Nation. https:// www.thenation.com/article/hungary-and-end-politics/. Accessed June 2016.
Shevtsova, L. F. (2000) Can electoral autocracy survive? Journal of Democracy, 11(3), 36-38.
Smith, A. D. (1996). Culture, community and territory: the politics of ethnicity and nationalism. International Affairs, 74(3), 451-452.
Smith, A. D. (1999). Ethnic election and national destiny: some religious origins of nationalist ideals. Nations and Nationalism, 5(3), 331-355.
Smith, A. D. (2009). Ethno-symbolism and nationalism. A cultural approach. New York and London: Routledge.
Szabo, A. (Ed.) (2013). Political orientations, values and activities of Hungarian University and College Students. In Active Youth in Hungary Research Group. Prague: Heinrich-Boll-Stiftung.
Takacs, P. (2015). A rozsa neve: Magyar Koztarsasag - Az allamok neverol es a magyar allam atnevezeserol (The name of the rose: Hungarian republic: on the names of states and the renaming of the Hungarian state). Budapest: Gondolat.
Tavares Report. (2013, June 25). Report A7-0229/2013 on the situation of fundamental rights: standards and practices in Hungary (pursuant to the European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2012). Report prepared by the European Parliament. (2012/2130(INI)).
Til, J. V. (2015). Democratic resurgence in Hungary: challenges to oppositional movement (an open-ended conclusion). In: P. Krasztev & J. V. Til (Eds.), The Hungarian patient. Social opposition to an illiberal democracy. Budapest: Central European University Press.
Toth, G. A. (2012). Constitution for a disunited nation: on Hungary’s 2011 fundamental law (pp. 1-21). Budapest: Central European University Press.
Vidra, Z., & Fox, J. (2014). Mainstreaming of racist anti-Roma discourses in the media in Hungary. Journal of Immigrant and Refugee Studies, 12(4), 437-455.
Vidra, Z., Horvath, A., Fox, J. (2012). Tolerance and cultural diversity discourses in Hungary. In: R. Zapata-Barrero & A. Triandafyllidou (Eds.), Addressing tolerance and diversity discourse in Europe comparative overview of 16 European countries (pp. 317-43). Barcelona: Barcelona Centre for International Affairs. Wenman, M. (2013). Agonistic democracy, constituent power in the era of globalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wike, R. (2010, April 7). Hungary dissatisfied with democracy, but not its ideals. Pew Global Attitudes Project. http://www.pewglobal.org/2010/04/07/hun gary-dissatisfied-with-democracy-but-not-its-ideals/. Accessed 1 June 2016. Wodak, R. (2009). The discursive construction of national identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Wodak, R., Khosravinik, M., & Mral, B. (2013) Rightwing populism in Europe: politics and discourse. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
WorldBank. (2016). Data: Hungary. http://data.worldbank.org/country/hungary. Accessed June 2016.
World Bank Group. (2016). Resolving insolvency in Hungary. http://www. doingbusiness.org/data/exploreeconomies/hungary/resolving-insolvency/. Accessed June 2016.
World Economic Forum. (2014). Insight report: the global gender gap report 2014. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/GGGR14/GGGR_CompleteReport_ 2014.pdf. Accessed June 2016.
Zakaria, F. (1997, November-December). The rise ofilliberal democracy. Foreign Affairs, 76(6), 22-43.
Andras L. Pap is Research Chair and Head of Department for the Study of Constitutionalism and the Rule of Law at the Hungarian Academy of Sciences Centre for Social Sciences Institute for Legal Studies, and a SASRO-Marie Sklodowska-Curie Fellow at the Institute of Sociology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences in Bratislava. He is also Professor of Law at the Law Enforcement Faculty of the National University of Public Service and a Recurrent Visiting (Adjunct) Professor at the Nationalism Studies Program at Central European University in Budapest, Hungary. He has published 6 books, 6 textbooks and over 200 articles on constitutional law, human rights, minority rights and law enforcement issues.