Table of Contents:

Acknowledgments

This text is the translated and modified version of an essay originally written in German (Scholtz 2017). I am very grateful to Allison Brown for the excellent translation.

I would like to thank Beate Witzel-Scholtz, Ariel Chipman, and Bruno Vellutini for critical reviews of the manuscript.

References

Altenburger, A. 2016. The neuromuscular system of Pycnophyes kielensis (Kinorhyncha: Allomalorhagida) investigated by confocal laser scanning microscopy. EvoDevo 7: 25. Auman. T.. В. M. I. Vreede. A. Weiss, S. D. Hester, T. A. Williams, L. M. Nagy, and A. D. Chipman. 2017. Dynamics of growth zone patterning in the milkweed bug Oncopeltus fasciatus. Development 44: 1896-1905.

Balavoine, G., and A. Adoutte. 2003. The segmented Urbilateria: A testable scenario. Integr. Comp. Biol. 43: 137-147.

Balazuc, J. 1948. La teratologie des coleopteres et experiences de transplantation sur Tenebrio molitorL. Mem. Mus. Nat. Hist nat. Paris (N.S.) 25: 1-293.

Budd. G. 2001. Why are arthropods segmented? Evol. Dev. 3: 332-342.

Cannon, J. T., В. C. Vellutini, J. Smith, F. Ronquist, U. Jondelius, and A. Hejnol. 2016.

Xenacoelomorpha is the sister group to Nephrozoa. Nature 530: 89-93.

Carroll. S. B., J. K. Grenier, and S. D. Weatherbee. 2001. From DNA to Diversity. Malden, MA: Blackwell Science.

Chipman, A. D. 2008. Thoughts and speculations on the ancestral arthropod segmentation pathway. In Evolving Pathways - Key Themes in Evolutionary Developmental Biology, Ed. A. Minelli, and G. Fusco, 343-358. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Chipman, A. D. 2019. Becoming segmented. In Perspectives on Evolutionary and Developmental Biology - Essays for Alessandro Minelli, Ed. G. Fusco, 235-244. Padova: Padova University Press.

Clark, R. B. 1964. Dynamics in Metazoan Evolution. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Deutsch, J. S. 2004. Segments and parasegments in arthropods: A functional perspective. BioEssays 26: 1117-1125.

Deutsch, J. S., and H. Le Guyader. 1998. The neural zootype. An hypothesis. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Ser. Ill 321: 713-719.

Dohle, W. 1979. Vergleichende Entwicklungsgeschichte des Mesoderms bei Articulaten.

Fortschr. Zool. Syst. Evolutionsforsch. 1: 120-140.

Dohle, W. 1999. The ancestral cleavage pattern of the clitellates and its phylogenetic deviations. Hydrobiologia 402: 267-283.

Dohle, W„ M. Gerberding, A. Hejnol, and G. Scholtz. 2004. Cell lineage, segment differentiation, and gene expression in crustaceans. In Evolutionary Developmental Biology of Crustacea. Ed. G. Scholtz, 95-133. Lisse: A.A. Balkema.

Fusco, G., L. Bonato, and M. Lesniewska. 2008. Helicomery in centipede trunk: Different processes for the same pattern../. Morph. 269: 1477.

Gegenbaur, C. 1870. Grundzuge der Vergleichenden Anatomie, 2nd ed. Leipzig: Engelmann.

Gilbert, S. F. 2003. Developmental Biology, 7th ed. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.

Gutmann, W. 1972. Die Hydroskelett-Theorie. Аи/s. Red. Senckenberg. Naturf. Ges. 21: 1-91.

Haeckel, E. 1866. Generelle Morphologie der Organismen. Berlin: Georg Reimer Verlag.

Hannibal, R. L.. and N. H. Patel. 2013. What is a segment? EvoDevo 4: 35.

Hatschek, B. 1878. Studien liber Entwicklungsgeschichte der Anneliden. Ein Beitrag zur Morphologie der Bilaterien. Arb. Zool. Inst. Univ. Wien 1: 57-129.

Hatschek, B. 1882. Studien iiber Entwicklung des Amphioxus. Arb. Zool. Inst. Univ. Wien 4: 1-88.

Hatschek, B. 1888-1891. Lehrbuch der Zoologie. Jena: Gustav Fischer Verlag.

Hertwig, O., and R. Hertwig. 1881. Die Coelomtheorie. Versuch einer Erkldrung des mit- tleren Keimblatts. Jena: Gustav Fischer Verlag.

Holland, L. Z., N. D. Holland, and M. Schubert. 2000. Developmental expression of AmphiWntI, an amphioxus gene in the Wntl/wingless subfamily. Dev. Genes Evol. 210: 522-524.

Holland, L. Z., M. Kene. N. A. Williams, and N. D. Holland. 1997. Sequence and embryonic expression of the amphioxus engrailed gene (AmphiEn): The metameric pattern of transcription resembles that of its segment-polarity homolog in Drosophila. Development 124: 1723-1732.

Janssen, R., N.-M. Prpic, and W. G. M. Damen. 2006. Dorso-ventral differences in gene expression in Glomeris marginata (Villers, 1789) (Myriapoda: Diplopoda). Norw. J. Entom. 53: 129-137.

Koch, M., B. Quast, and T. Bartolomaeus. 2014. Coeloms and nephridia in annelids and arthropods. In Deep Metazoan Phytogeny: The Backbone of the Tree of Life, Ed. J. W. Wagele, and T. Bartolomaeus, 173-284. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Korschelt, E., and K. Heider. 1890. Lehrbuch der vergleichenden Entwicklungsgeschichte der Wirbellosen Tiere. SpeciellerTeil, Erstes Heft. Jena: Gustav Fischer Verlag.

Lang, A. 1881. Der Bau von Gunda segmentata und die Verwandtschaftsverhaltnisse der Plathelminthen mit Coelenteraten und Hirudineen. Mitt. Zool. Stat. Neapel 3: 187-251.

Lang, A. 1903. Beitrage zu einer Trophocoltheorie. Jen. Zeitschr. Naturw. (N.F.) 38: 1-376.

Lawrence, P. A. 1992. The Making of a Fly. Oxford: Blackwell.

Lesniewska, M., L. Bonato, A. Minelli, and G. Fusco. 2009. Trunk anomalies in the centipede Stigmatogaster subterranea provide insight into late-embryonic segmentation. Arthropod Struct. Dev. 38: 417-426.

Linder, F. 1952. Contributions to the morphology and taxonomy of the Branchiopoda Notostraca, with special reference to the North American species. Proc. United States Nat. Mas. 102: 1-69.

Martin, С., V. Gross, H.-J. Pfliiger, P. A. Stevenson, and G. Mayer. 2017. Assessing segmental versus non-segmental features in the ventral nervous system of onychophorans (velvet worms). BMC Evol. Biol. 17: 3.

Meinhardt, H. 2015. Models for patterning primary embryonic body axes: The role of space and time. Sent. Cell Dev. Biol. 42: 103-117.

Minelli, A., and G. Fusco. 2004. Evo-devo perspectives on segmentation: Model organisms, and beyond. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 423-429.

Mobius, K. 1908. Asthetik der Tierwelt. Jena: Gustav Fischer Verlag.

Morgan, T. H. 1895. A study of metamerism. Quart. J. Microsc. Sci. 37: 395-476.

Prud’homrne, B., R. de Rosa, D. Arendt, J. F. Julien, R. Pajaziti, A. Dorresteijn, A. Adoutte, J. Wittbrodt, and G. Balavoine. 2003. Arthropod-like expression patterns of engrailed and wingless in the annelid Platynereis dumerilii suggest a role in segment formation. Cum Biol. 13: 1876-1881.

Remane, A. 1950. Die Entstehung der Metamerie der Wirbellosen. In Verhandlungen der Deutschen Zoologen vom 2. bis 6. August in Mainz, Ed. W. Herre, 16-23. Leipzig: Geest & Portig.

Riedl, R. 1975. Die Ordnung des Lebendigen. Hamburg: Paul Parey Verlag.

Rieger, R. M., and G. Purschke. 2005. The coelom and the origin of the annelid body plan. Hydrobiologia 535/536: 127-137.

Salvini-Plawen, L. 1998. Morphologie: Haeckels Gastraea-Theorie und ihre Folgen. Stapfia 56: 147-168.

Schmidt-Rhaesa, A. 2007. The Evolution of Organ Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Scholtz, G. 1990. The formation, differentiation and segmentation of the post-naupliar germ band of the amphipod Gammarus pulex L. (Crustacea, Malacostraca, Peracarida). Proc. R. Soc. London В 239: 163-211.

Scholtz, G. 2002. The Articulata hypothesis - or what is a segment? Org. Divers. Evol. 2: 197-215.

Scholtz, G. 2003. Is the taxon Articulata obsolete? Arguments in favour of a close relationship between annelids and arthropods. In The New Panorama of Animal Evolution, Ed. A. Legakis, S. Senthourakis, R. Polymeni, and M. Thessalou-Legaki, 489-501. Sofia: Pensoft.

Scholtz, G. 2010. Deconstructing morphology. Acta Zool. 91: 44-63.

Scholtz, G. 2017. Segmentierung. Ein zoologisches Konzept von Serialitat. In Serie und Serialitdt, Ed. G. Scholtz, 139-166. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer Verlag.

Scholtz, G., and W. Dohle. 1996. Cell lineage and cell fate in crustacean embryos - A comparative approach, hit. J. Dev. Biol. 40: 211-220.

Scholtz, G., and G. D. Edgecombe. 2006. The evolution of arthropod heads: Reconciling morphological, developmental and palaeontological evidence. Dev. Genes Evol. 216: 395-415.

Scholtz, G„ and C. Wolff. 2013. Arthropod embryology: Cleavage and germ band development. In Arthropod Biology and Evolution, Ed. A. Minelli, G. Boxshall. and G. Fusco, 63-90. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.

Schramke, S. 2017. Asthetik des Serienbruchs. Versuch einer Deutung der Stoning in der ornamentalen Fassadenreihung der Erweiterung des Stadtarchivs Munchen. In Serie und Serialitdt, Ed. G. Scholtz, 59-76. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer Verlag.

Seaver. E. C. 2003. Segmentation: Mono-or polyphyletic? Int. J. Dev. Biol. 47: 583-596.

Seaver, E. C., and L. M. Kaneshige. 2006. Expression of ‘segmentation’ genes during larval and juvenile development in the polychaetes Capitella sp. I and H. elegans. Dev. Biol. 289: 79-194.

Sedgwick, A. 1884. On the origin of metamerie segmentation and some other morphological questions. Quart. J. Microsc. Sci. 24: 43-82.

Starunov, V. V., N. Dray, E. V. Belikova, P. Kerner, M. Vervoort, and G. Balavoine. 2015. A metamerie origin for the annelid pygidium? BMC Evol. Biol. 15: 25.

Tautz, D. 2004. Segmentation. Dev. Cell 7: 301-312.

Toepfer, G. 2017. Serialitat als naturliches Phanomen. Beschreibungsmodell der Biologie und Evolutionsprodukt. In Serie und Serialitdt, Ed. G. Scholtz, 11-30. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer Verlag.

Treffkorn, S., L. Kahnke, L. Hering, and G. Mayer. 2018. Expression of NK cluster genes in the onychophoran Euperipatoides rowelli: Implications for the evolution of NK family genes in nephrozoans. EvoDevo 9: 17.

Vellutini, B. C., and A. Hejnol. 2016. Expression of segment polarity genes in brachiopods supports a non-segmental ancestral role of engrailed for bilaterians. Sci. Rep. 6: 32387. Westheide, W. 1997. The direction of evolution within the Polychaeta. J. Nat. Hist. 31: 1-15. Westheide, W., and R. Rieger (ed.). 2007. Spezielle Zoologie, Teil 1: Einzeller and Wirbellose Tiere, 2nd ed. Miinchen: Spektrum.

Williams, T. A., B. Blachuta, T. A. Hegna, and L. M. Nagy. 2012. Decoupling elongation and segmentation: Notch involvement in anostracan crustacean segmentation. Evol. Dev. 14: 372-382.

 
Source
< Prev   CONTENTS   Source   Next >