Global Challenges and Responsibility

The last 100 years have seen massive industrialization. Indeed such developments were coupled with the rapid increase in world population and the desire to enhance economy and food productivity. While industrialization has led to increased economic activity and much benefit to the human race, the lack of regulatory measures and appropriate waste management strategies until the early 1980s (including the use of agrochemicals) has resulted in contamination of our biosphere. Continued pollution of the environment through industrial emissions is of global concern. There is, therefore, a need for politicians, regulatory organizations, and scientists to work together to minimize environmental contamination and to remediate contaminated sites. The responsibility to check this pollution lies with every individual and country although the majority of this pollution is due to the industrialized nations. There is a clear need for better coordination of efforts in dealing with numerous forms of PS pollution problems that are being faced globally.


  • 1. Mehlum, H.K.; Arnesen, A.K.M.; Singh, B.R. Extractability and plant uptake of heavy metals in alum shale soils. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 1998,29,183-198.
  • 2. McBride, M.B. Reactions controlling heavy metal solubility in soils. Adv. Soil Sci. 1989,10,1-56.
  • 3. Patil, G.P.; Gore, S.D.; Johnson, G.D. EPA Observational Economy Series Volume 3: Manual on Statistical Design and Analysis with Composite Samples; Technical Report No. 96-0501; Center for Statistical Ecology and Environmental Statistics: Pennsylvania State University, 1996.
  • 4. Ward, T.J.; Correll, R.L. Estimating background concentrations of heavy metals in the marine environment, Proceedings of a Bioaccumulation Workshop: Assessment of the Distribution, Impacts and Bioaccumulation of Contaminants in Aquatic Environments, Sydney, 1990; Miskiewicz, A.G., Ed.; Water Board and Australian Marine Science Association: Sydney, 1992; 133-139.
  • 5. Jones, K.C.; Davies, B.E.; Peterson, PJ. Silver in welsh soils: physical and chemical distribution studies. Geoderma 1986,37,157-174.
  • 6. Barber, C.; Bates, L.; Barron, R.; Allison, H. Assessment of the relative vulnerability of groundwater to pollution: A review and background paper for the conference workshop on vulnerability assessment. J. Aust. Geol. Geophys. 1993,14(2-3), 147-154. 880 Pollution: Point Source (PS)
  • 7. Wenzel, W.W.; Blum, W.E.H. Effects of fluorine deposition on the chemistry of acid luvisols. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 1992, 46, 223-231.
  • 8. Megharaj, M.; Singleton, I.; McClure, N.C. Effect of penta-chlorophenol pollution towards microalgae and microbial activities in soil from a former timber processing facility. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 1998, 61,108-115.
  • 9. Juhasz, A.L.; Megharaj, M.; Naidu, R. Bioavailability: the major challenge (constraint) to bioremediation of organically contaminated soils. In Remediation Engineering of Contaminated Soils; Wise, D., Trantolo, D.J., Cichon, E.J., Inyang, H.I., Stottmeister, U., Eds.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 2000; 217-241.
  • 10. Wood, P.A. Remediation methods for contaminated sites. In Contaminated Land and Its Reclamation; Hester, R.E., Harrison, R.M., Eds.; Royal Society of Chemistry, Thomas Graham House: Cambridge, UK, 1997; 47-73.
  • 11. Barzi, F.; Naidu, R.; McLaughlin, M.J. Contaminants and the Australian soil environment. In Contaminants and the Soil Environment in the Australasia-Pacific Region; Naidu, R., Kookana, R.S., Oliver, D., Rogers, S„ McLaughlin, M.J., Eds.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 1996; 451-484.


Soil Carbon and Nitrogen

< Prev   CONTENTS   Source   Next >