Normalizing pandemic episode by science-economy- society moral inclusiveness


The central explanatory formalism of all pandemic, and thereby, of multidimensional factors of complementary relations in evaluating the objective criterion of wellbeing is the ontologically derived model of unity of knowledge between the good things of life by their organic endogenous circular- causation relations. The underlying model of this ontological derivation resulting in epistemic and followed by phenomenological implications, all together repeating in circular causation inter-variable relations, is explained. In this chapter the extension of the underlying formalism is studied in terms of a wider field of evaluation of the wellbeing criterion premised on its ontological groundwork. The emergent empiiical work in this chapter thereby implies that the multivariate and multidimensional unity of knowledge is analytically studied in a vastly formal context.

The inherent interdependent variables and their relations appear in complex non-linear forms to combat the pandemic severity of many converging malaise that have been ignored in the combination of science, economic, social, and ethical treatments. The formulation of the wellbeing function for the treatment of coronavirus into a normalcy state necessitates a comprehensive approach that combines these diverse factors within their moral inclusiveness as an endogenously integrated comprehensive whole. We refer to this facet of the model as pervasively complemented multidisciplinary ensemble or the socio- scientific world-system arising from the ontology of unity of knowledge. In the qur’anic context this ontological primacy is called Tawhid. We treat Taw- hid as the law of unity of knowledge between the good choices and those that can be converted from the avoidable categories into acceptable choices by relativity of their variable-relatives. All these feed into the wellbeing objective function and form inter-variable circular causation relations.

In the multivariate causes of pandemic consequences both incidence and cure suggest that large systems of complex and non-linear relations of mathematical computerized nature must be studied. The resulting logical formalism would span across the domains of ontology, episterne, and phenomenology continuously interrelating altogether to establish sustainability of the socio-scientific universe (world-system). The model of moral inclusiveness along with its various socio-scientific elements described by variables thereby comprise the resulting algorithmic model of science-economy-society moral inclusiveness. The epistemic features of the resulting multidisciplinary model of unity of knowledge developed for treatment of the pandemic case are shown in Figure 4.1.

Continuity of methodology of unity of knowledge by primal ontology of truth over the domain of continuum of knowledge, space, and time

Figure 4.1 Continuity of methodology of unity of knowledge by primal ontology of truth over the domain of continuum of knowledge, space, and time

< Prev   CONTENTS   Source   Next >