Conclusión

Mantener una presencia virtual en plataformas sociales puede ayudar en la cons- truccion de una identidad digital consistente e identificable a nivel profesional у aportar multiples beneficios al investigador de espanol LE/L2 en tareas tales сото la colaboracion, la produccion у la comunicacion cientifica. Tener un perfil actualizado en las redes academicas mas importantes у obtener un iden- tificador imico de investigador es basico para optimizar la presencia en linea. Cabe tener presentes los retos que conlleva el mantenimiento de los perfiles у el papel cada vez mas activo que se espera del investigador, sobre todo en labores relacionadas con la comunicacion у la difusion cientifica. Es impor- tante estar familiarizado con las licencias de publicacion de los documentos у conocer los mandatos de acceso abierto de las instituciones у otras entidades de financiacion. Por eso es recomendable dedicar tiempo a formarse у aprovechar el apoyo institucional para poderse manejar con propiedad у tranquilidad entre las distintas plataformas у servicios. Asimismo, debemos ser conscientes del modelo de negocio de las distintas plataformas, de su programa de preservacion, de su continuidad en el futuro у de los posibles usos comerciales que se vaya a hacer de nuestros datos у publicaciones. En cualquier caso, no podemos olvidar que la etica academica que rige nuestra practica diaria debe hacerse extensiva tambien a estos espacios digitales.

Bibliografía

“Academia.edu”. 2018. www.academia.edu/about

Bond, S. 2017. “Dear Scholars, Delete Your Account at Academia.Edit”. Forbes, https:// www.forbes.com/sites/drsarahbond/2017/01/23/dear-scholars-delete-your-account- at-academia-edu/

Bornmann, L. у R. Haunschild. 2016. “To What Extent Does the Leiden Manifesto Also Apply to Altmetrics?”. Online Information Remew 40 (4): 529-543. https://doi. org/10.1108/OIR-09-2015-0314

Cahoy, E. S. 2018. “Leave the Browser Behind: Placing Discover)' Within the Users Work- flow”. LIBER Quarterly 28 (1): 1-19. http://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10221 Carrigan, M. 2016. Social Media for Academics. Cambridge: Sage.

Catedra de Altos Estudios del Espanol. 2019. “El Centro Internacional del Espanol ultima el lanzamiento de la comunidad virtual de investigadores COMUN-ES”. http://caee.usal.es/ noticias/el-centro-internacional-del-espanol-ultima-el-lanzamiento-de-la-comunidad- virtual-de-investigadores-comun-es/#more-920 Chawla, D. 2017. “Publishers Take Research Gate to Court, Alleging Massive Copyright Infringement”. Science, www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/10/publishers-take-research gate-court-alleging-massive-copyright-infringement Collins, E. 2013. “Social Media and Scholarly Communications: The More They Change, the More They Stay the Same?” En The Future of Scholarly Communication, coords. D. Shorley у M. Jubb, 89-102. Londres: Facet.

Cruz Pinol, M. 2014. “Veinte anos de tecnologias у ELE. Reflexiones en torno a la ense- nanza del espanol сото lengua extranjera en la era de internet”. Marco ELE 19. https:// marcoele.com/veinte-anos-de-tecnologias-y-ele/

Delgado-Lopez-Cozar, E. 2019. “Research interest score: el nuevo indicador bibliometrico que mide la influencia de las publicaciones de un autor en ResearchGate”. http://hdl. handle.net/10481/55064

Espinoza Vasquez, F. К. у С. E. Caicedo Bastidas. 2015. “Academic Social Networking Sites: A Comparative Analysis of Their Services and Tools”. En iConference 2015 Proceedings. http://hdl.handle.net/2142/73715

Fitzpatrick, K. 2018. “Humanities Commons: Collaboration and Collective Action for the Common Good”. En Hnmanidades Digitales (DH 2018): Bridges/Puentes. Mexico City. https://dh2018.adho.org/humanities-commons-collaboration-and-collective-action- for-the-common-good/

Geltner, G. у J. Willinsky. 2017. “Scholarly Hub: A Progress Report at Six Months”. En ELPUB, June 2018. Toronto: ELPUB. https://dx.doi.org/10.4000/proceedings. elpub.2018.6

Greifeneder, E., S. Ponds, A. Blandford, H. Attalla, D. Neal у К. Schlebbe. 2018. “Researchers’ Attitudes Towards the Use of Social Networking Sites”. Journal of Documentation 74 (1): 119-136. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-04-2017-0051 Gruzd, A. 2013. “Non-Academic and Academic Social Networking Sites for Online Scholarly Communities”. En Social Media for Academics: A Practical Guide, ed. D. Rasmussen Neal, 21-37. Oxford: Chandos Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1016/ B978-1 -84334-681 -4.50002-5

Hammarfelt, B. 2014. “Using Altmetrics for Assessing Research Impact in the Humanities”.

Scientometrics 101 (2): 1419-1430. https://doi.org/10.1007/slll92-014-1261-3 Harington, R. 2017. “ResearchGate: Publishers Take Formal Steps to Force Copyright Compliance”. The Scholarly Kitchen, https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2017/10/06/ researchgate-publishers-take-formal-steps-force-copyright-compliance/

Hyman, A. 2003. “Twenty Years of ListServ as an Academic Tool”. The Internet and Higher Education 6 (1): 17-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00159-8 Jamali, H. R. 2017. “Copyright Compliance and Infringement in ResearchGate Full- Text Journal Articles”. Scientometrics 112 (1): 241-254. https://doi.org/10.1007/ si 1192-017-2291-4

Jamali, H. R., D. Nicholas у E. Herman. 2016. “Scholarly Reputation in the Digital Age and the Role of Emerging Platforms and Mechanisms”. Research Evaluation 25 (1): 37-49. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rw032 Jordan, К. у M. Weller. 2018a. “Academics and Social Networking Sites: Benefits, Problems and Tensions in Professional Engagement with Online Networking”. Journal of Interactive Media in Education 1: 1-9. http://doi.org/10.5334/jime.448 Jordan, К. у M. Weller. 2018b. “Communication, Collaboration and Identity: Factor Analysis of Academics’ Perceptions of Online Networking”. Research in Learning Technology 26. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v26.2013

Komljenovic, J. 2019. “Big Data and New Social Relations in Higher Education: Academia, edu, Google Scholar and ResearchGate”. En World Yearbook of Education 2019: Comparative Methodology in an Era of Big Data and Global Networks, ed. R. Gorur, S. Sellar у G. Steiner-Khamsi, 148-164. Londres: Routledge.

Kraker, P. у E. Lex. 2015. “A Critical Look at the Research Gate Score as a Measure of Scientific Reputation”. En Quantifying and Analysing Scholarly Communication on the Web (ASCW’15). Oxford: Oxford University Press, http://doi.org/10.5281/ zenodo.35401

Labastida, I. 2018. “L’estat actual de Faeces obert”. Communication Papers: Media Literacy & Gender Studies 7 (13): 227-236. http://hdl.handle.net/2445/121812 Lanier, J. 2018. Diez razones para borrar tus redes sociales de inmediato. Barcelona: Debate. Lupton, D. 2014. ‘Feeling Better Connected’: Academics’ Use of Social Media. Canberra: News Sc Media Research Centre, University of Canberra.

Manca, S. у M. Ranieri. 2017. “Networked Scholarship and Motivations for Social Media Use in Scholarly Communication”. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Darning 18 (2). www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2859/4084 Mas Bleda, А. у I . F. Aguillo. 2015. Li web social сото nuevo medio de comunicacion у evaluation cientifica. Barcelona: Editorial UOC.

Matthews, D. 2016. “Do Academic Social Networks Share Academics’ Interests?”. The Times Higher Education, www.timeshighereducation.com/features/do-academic-social- networks-share-academics-interests

Munoz-Basols, J., A. Rodriguez-Lifante у О. Cruz-Moya. 2017. “Perfil laboral, forma- tivo e investigador del profesional de espanol сото lengua extranjera о segunda (ELE/ EL2): datos cuantitativos у cualitativos”. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching 4 (1): 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/23247797.2017.1325 H5 Munoz-Canavate, A., A. Cordero-Gonzalez, P. Hipola у A. Cardoso Miranda. 2017. “Mailing Lists on the Internet: A Collaboration Tool That Is Still Alive. The Case of the Rediris Lists”. En IADIS International Conference WWW/Internet, 261-266. http://www. iadisportal.org/digital-library/mailing-lists-on-the-internet-a-collaboration-tool-that- is-still-alive-the-case-of-the-rediris-lists

Nandez, G. у A. Borrego. 2013. “Use of Social Networks for Academic Purposes: A Case Study”. The Electronic Library 31 (6): 781-791. https://doi.org/10.1108/ EL-03-2012-0031

Nicholas, D. 2017. “New Ways of Building, Showcasing, and Measuring Scholarly Reputation in the Digital Age”. Information Services & Use 37: 1—5. http://doi.org/10.3233/ ISU-160792

Orduna-Malea, E., A. Martin-Martin у E. Delgado-Lopez-Cozar. 2016. “ResearchGate сото fuente de evaluation cientifica: desvelando sus aplicaciones bibliometricas”. El Profesional de la Information 25 (2): 303-310. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2016.mar.18

Ortega, J. L. 2016. Social Network Sites for Scientists: A Quantitative Survey. Oxford: Chandos Publishing/Elsevier.

Ortega, J. L. 2017. “Redes sociales academicas ;cspacios colaborativos о clubes Diogenes?”. Annario ThinkEPI 11: 225-229. https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2017.42

Reller, T. 2013. “A Comment on Takedown Notices”. Elsevier Connect, https://www.elsevier. com/connect/a-comment-on-takedown-notices

Romero, E. 2019. “Lanzamiento de la Red Knowmetrics de Ciencias Sociales у Humanidades Digitales”. Knowmetrics. https://estebanromero.com/2019/06/lanzamiento-de-la-red- knownietrics-de-ciencias-sociales-y-humanidades-digitales/

Rovira-Collado, J. 2016. “ELE 2.0 сото tendencia docente e investigadora en la ensenanza de lenguas extranjeras”. Revista Fuentes 18 (2): 167-182. https://revistascientificas.us.es/ index, php/fuentes/article/view/2829

“Status Report: Update on ResearchGate s Copyright Compliance Status . . .”2018. www. responsiblesharing.org/coalition-statement/

Van Noorden, R. 2014. “Scientists and the Social Network”. Nature 512: 126-129. https:// go.nature.com/2sS2d5D

Weller, M. 2011. The Digital Scholar: How Technology Is Transforming Scholarly Practice. Lon- dres: Bloomsbury Academic.

Recursos en línea

  • • Academia.edu: www.academia.edu/
  • • Altmetric.com: https://altmetric.com
  • • Comun-es: www.comun-es.com/
  • • Facebook: www.facebook.com/
  • • GitHub: https://github.com/
  • • Google Scholar Citations: https://scholar.google.com/citations
  • • Humanities Commons: http://hcommons.org/
  • • ImpactStory: https://profiles.impactstory.org/
  • • Infoling: http://infoling.org/
  • • Mendeley: www.mendeley.com/
  • • MLA Biblink: https://biblink.mla.org/
  • • ORCID: https://orcid.org/
  • • Our Research: https://our-research.org/
  • • Publons: https://publons.com/
  • • Red Knowmetrics de Ciencias Sociales у Humanidades: https://red. knowmetrics.org/
  • • ResearchGate: www.researchgate.net/
  • • Scopus: www.scopus.com/
  • • Sherpa Romeo: https://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/
  • • Slideshare: www.slideshare.net/
  • • Tweetdeck: https://tweetdeck.twitter.com/
  • • Twitter: https://twitter.com/
  • • Wakelet: https://wakelet.com/
  • • Web of Science: https://webofknowledge.com/
 
Source
< Prev   CONTENTS   Source   Next >