Concluding thoughts

Table of Contents:

The discussion in this chapter has drawn together reflections from literature and experience to explore the benefits of participant-generated photo-elicitation to higher education research. In so doing, the chapter sought to add to contributions elsewhere in this volume by' reflecting on these benefits in terms of ‘diarying’. The chapter argued that participant generated photo-elicitation in the form undertaken was a method which allowed participants to diary' their experiences. Specifically, this diarying can be seen in the way the method allowed access to the everyday' -similar to the representations of everyday lives found in time-use diaries, and reflective narratives - similar to those accessed by the reflexive diaries. Photo-elicitation also develops such diarying with the inclusion of the visual, bringing varied mediums into research to more appropriately reflect the various textures of everyday life, and to encourage reflection and reminiscing.

Specific to the context of higher education, the example images included show the ability' of photo-elicitation to access the diverse everyday contexts of higher education experiences, and to elicit narratives which are deep, varied and personal. From the first image’s emergent narrative of self and friendship, through the discussion of family and the need for space in relation to the second image, into the third image’s reflection on the varied and extreme meanings of personal space, the discussions highlight the power of photo-elicitation to engage with and develop the reach of higher education research. These possibilities - present due to the co-existence of the roles of creator of the image (presenting everyday experience), and interpreter of the image (reflexively narrating and interpreting the image), allowed for unexpected flows to emerge.

Despite the clear benefits of diary' methods generally, and here participant generated photo-elicitation particularly, the methods remain underutilised in higher education research. It is hoped the contributions in this volume, and the reflections in this chapter, can encourage researchers to consider diary methods in order to allow the everyday' and the personal to continue to be present and to emerge more fully' in discussions of higher education.

Acknowledgements

Michael Keenan would like to thank the Society for Research into Higher Education for their generous Rinding of the research project ‘Exploring LGBTQ Diversity' in Higher Education: Extending Research into LGBTQ Student Experience’ (Annual Award 2016) which is the basis for the included chapter. Michael would also like to thank all the participants in this research for their engagement, time, effort and creativity'. Finally, Michael would like to thank the editors of this volume for their encouragement and helpRil comments.

References

Ahmed, S. (2007) ‘You end up doing the document rather than doing the doing’: Diversity', race equality' and the politics of documentation. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30,4: 590-609.

Allen, L. (2012) ‘Picture this’: Using photo-methods in research on sexualities and schooling. Qualitative Research, 11, 5: 487-504.

Anderson, P. & Green, P. (2012) Beyond GV building: The communal benefits of student volunteering. Voluntary Sector Review, 3, 2: 247-256.

Balloo, K., Pauli, R. & Worrell, M. (2017) Undergraduates’ personal circumstances, expectations and reasons for attending university. Studies in Higher Education, 42, 8: 1373-1384.

Bosse, J. D. & Chiodo, L. (2016) It is complicated: Gender and sexual orientation identity' in LGBTQ youth. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 25, 23-24: 3665-3675.

Damn, T., Buchwald, H., Gerlicher, A. & Birner, R. (2019) Times have changed: Using a pictorial smartphone app to collect time-use data in rural Zambia. Field Methods, 31, 1: 3-22.

Formby, E. (2015) # FreshersToFinals: From freshers’ week to finals: Understanding LGRT+ perspectives on, and experiences of higher education. Sheffield: Sheffield Hallam University.

Garcia, B., Welford, J. & Smith, B. (2016) Using a smartphone app in qualitative research: The good, the bad and the ugly. Qualitative Research, 16, 5: 508-525.

Guell, C. & Ogilvie, D. (2015) Picturing commuting: Photovoice and seeking well-being in everyday travel. Qualitative Research, 15, 2: 201-218.

Gunthert, К. C. & Wenze, S. J. (2012) Daily diary methods. In M. R. Mehl & T. S. Conner (eds), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life. Guilford: The Guilford Press, pp. 144-159.

Harper, D. (2002) Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies, 17, 1: 13-26.

Harvey, L. (2011) Intimate reflections: Private diaries in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 11,6: 664-682.

Heath, M. A. (2005) Pronouncing the silent ‘B’ (in GLBTTIQ). Gay and Lesbian Issues and Psychology Review, 1, 3: 88-92.

Harrington, С. E. & Schibik, T. J. (2003) Reflexive photography as an alternative method for the study of the freshman year experience. NASPA Journal, 41, 1: 23-40.

Hyers, L. L., Swim, J. K. & Mallett, R. K. (2006) The personal is political: Using daily diaries to examine everyday prejudice-related experiences. In S. N. Hesse-Biber & P. Leavy (eds), Emergent methods in social research. London: Sage, pp. 313-329.

Joy, P. & Numer, M. (2017) The use of photo elicitation to explore the benefits of queer student advocacy groups in university. Journal of LGВТ Youth, 14, 1: 31-50.

Kenten, C. (2010) Narrating oneself: Reflections on the use of solicited diaries with diary interviews. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11,2: article 16.

Lalloo, C., Jibb, L. A., Rivera, J., Agarwal, A. & Stinson, J. N. (2015) There’s a pain app for that. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 31, 6: 557-563.

Leonard, M. & McKnight, M. (2015) Look and tell: Using photo-elicitation methods with teenagers. Children’s Geographies, 13,6: 629-642.

Lewis, K., Sligo, F. & Massey, C. (2005) Observe, record, then beyond: Facilitating participant reflection via research diaries. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 2, 2: 216-229.

MacFarlane, D., Grieves, L. & Zwiers, A. (2014) One step at a time: Moving trans activism forward in a large bureaucracy. In D. Irving Sc R. Raj (eds), Trans activism in Canada: A reader. Toronto: Canadian Scholars Press, pp. 195-207.

Mannay, D. (2010) Making the familiar strange: Can visual research methods render the familiar setting more perceptible? Qualitative Research, 10, 1: 91-111.

Marks, L. (2002) Touch: Sensuous theory and multisensory media. Minnesota, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Mathison, S. (2012) Seeing is believing: The credibility of image-based research and evaluation. In J. Hughes (eds), Sage visual methods, volume 2, London: Sage, pp. 181-196.

Meo, A. I. (2010) Picturing students’ habitus: The advantages and limitations of photoelicitation interviewing in a qualitative study in the city of Buenos Aires. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 9, 2: 149-171.

Metcalfe, A. S. (2016) Visual methods in higher education. In F. Stage & K. Manning (eds), Research in the college context: Approaches and methods, 2nd edition. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 111-127.

Milligan, C., Bingley, A. & Gatrell, A. (2005) Digging deep: Using diary techniques to explore the place of health and well-being amongst older people. Social Science & Medicine, 61,9: 1882-1892.

Richard, V. M. & Lahman, M. K. (2015) Photo-elicitation: Reflexivity on method, analysis, and graphic portraits. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 38, 1: 3-22.

Samuels, J. (2004) Breaking the ethnographer’s frames: Reflections on the use of photo elicitation in understanding Sri Lankan monastic culture. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 12: 1528-1550.

Schreiber, M. (2015) ‘The smartphone is my constant companion’: Digital photographic practices and the elderly. In L. Krampet al. (eds), Journalism, representation and the public sphere. Bremen: Edition Luminaire, pp. 105-115.

Silver, J. & Reavey, P. (2010) ‘He’s a good-looking chap ain’t he?’: Narrative and visualisations of self in body dysmorphic disorder. Social Science & Medicine, 70, 10: 1641-1647.

Van Auken, P. M., Frisvoll, S. J. & Stewart, S. I. (2010) Visualising community: Using participant-driven photo-elicitation for research and application. Local Environment, 15, 4: 373-388.

Wagaman, M. A. (2016) Self-definition as resistance: Understanding identities among LGBTQ emerging adults. Journal of LGBT Youth, 13, 3: 207-230.

Witcomb, G. L., Brophy, H. & McDermott, H. (2019) More than meets the eye: A photo-elicitation study of gender (dis) affirmation in seven gender non-conforming university students. Psychology, 10, 12: 1599-1614.

 
Source
< Prev   CONTENTS   Source   Next >