Table of Contents:

Concluding remarks

This chapter has examined the nexus of wildlife tourism, fortress conservation and forced displacement. Opening protected areas to domestic visitors and foreign tourists provides legitimacy for demarcating and securitising these areas and removing any former residents that are considered ‘threats’ to an imaginary ‘wilderness’. All four case studies provide evidence that the protection and commodification of nature for tourist consumption can have detrimental impacts on local communities that have co-existed with wildlife long before these protected area enclaves were opened for tourism. While in Tanzania the government has run an openly hostile campaign against Indigenous peoples for many years and evicted hundreds of pastoralist communities from wildlife reserves such as the Serengeti National Park (often backed by international wildlife conservation organisations), the approach taken by the Mozambiquan authorities to resettle communities from the newly established Limpopo National Park was more subtle, dubbed as ‘induced volition’ (Milgroom and Spierenburg, 2008). Similar strategies have been adopted by park authorities in India after the introduction of new legal frameworks related to wildlife protection and resettlement, particularly the promulgation of the Forest Rights Act in 2006. In Colombia’s Tayrona National Park, a triple strategy of privatisation, ecotourism promotion and militarisation of tourist spots and travel routes has been employed by local elites and paramilitary forces to ‘protect pristine nature’ from the destructive action of ‘invaders’ and ‘illegal occupants’ who have been largely deprived of their customary access to the Park’s resources (cf. Ojeda, 2012).

The next chapter explores processes of gradual displacement and gentrification associated with (eco)cultural heritage tourism in the rural and urban contexts of Central America (Guatemala), East Asia (China), Southeast Asia (Cambodia) and South America (Argentina and Peru). These case studies will show the convergence of political agendas surrounding tourism development and historical heritage preservation and how this process undermines local people’s property and housing rights as well as their rights to participate meaningfully in the management of (eco)cultural heritage sites.

140 Wildlife tourism and fortress conservation


Adams, J.S. and McShane, T.O. (1992) The Myth of Wild Africa: Conservation without Illusion. SV.W. Norton: New York.

Akama, J.S. (2004) ‘Neocolonialism, dependency and external control of Africa’s tourism industry: A case study of wildlife safari tourism in Kenya’ in Hall, C.M. and Tucker, H. (eds) Tourism and Postcolonialism: Contested Discourses, Identities and Representations. Routledge: London, New York, pp. 140-152.

Benjaminsen, T.A. and Bryceson, I. (2012) ‘Conservation, green/blue grabbing and accumulation by dispossession in Tanzania’, Journal of Peasant Studies, 39 (2): 335—355.

Benjaminsen, T.A., Goldman, M.F., Minwary, M.Y. and Maganga, F.P. (2013) ‘Wildlife management in Tanzania: State control, rent seeking and community resistance’, Development and Change, 44 (5): 1087-1109.

Bluwstein, J., Lund, J.F., Askew, K., Stein, H., Noe, C., Odgaard, R., Maganga, F. and Engstrom, L. (2018) ‘Between dependence and deprivation: The interlocking nature of land alienation in Tanzania’, Journal of Agrarian Change, 18: 806-830.

Bocarejo, D. and Ojeda, D. (2016) ‘Violence and conservation: Beyond unintended consequences and unfortunate coincidences’, Geoforum 69: 176-183.

Brockington, D. and Igoe, J. (2006) ‘Eviction for conservation: A global overview’, Conservation & Society, 4 (3): 424-470.

Brockington, D., Duffy, R. and Igoe, J. (2008) Nature Unbound: Conservation, Capitalism and the Future of Protected Areas. Earthscan: London.

Briiggemann, J. and Rodriguez, E.E. (2004) ‘Tayrona National Park, Colombia: International support for conflict resolution through tourism’, Parks, 14 (1): 40-47.

Burgoyne, C. and Mearns, K. (2017) ‘Managing stakeholder relations, natural resources and tourism: A case study from Ololosokwan, Tanzania’, Tourism and Hospitality Research, 17 (1): 68-78.

Busscher, N., Parra, C. and Vanclay, F. (2018) ‘Land grabbing within a protected area: The experience of local communities with conservation and forestry activities in Los Esteros del Ibera, Argentina’, Land Use Policy, 78: 572—582.

Carruthers, J. (1995) The Kruger National Park. A Social and Political History. University of Natal Press: Pietermaritzburg.

Dash, M. and Bahera, B. (2018) ‘Biodiversity conservation, relocation and socio-economic consequences: a case study of Similipal Tiger Reserve, India’, Land Use Policy, 78: 327-337.

DeMotts, R. (2017) The Challenges of Transfrontier Conservation in Southern Africa: The Park Came After Us. Lexington Books: Maryland.

Forsyth, T. and Walker, A. (2008) Forest Guardians, Forest Destroyers: The Politics of Environmental Knowledge in Northern Thailand. Silkworm Books: Chiang Mai.

Gardner, B. (2012) ‘Tourism and the politics of the global land grab in Tanzania: Markets, appropriation and recognition’, Journal of Peasant Studies, 39 (2): 377-402.

Hill, A. (2017) ‘Blue grabbing: reviewing marine conservation in Redang Island Marine Park, Malaysia’, Geoforum 79: 97—100.

Hussain, A., Dasgupta, S. and Singh Bargali, H. (2016) ‘Conservation perceptions and attitudes of semi-nomadic pastoralist towards relocation and biodiversity management: A case study of Van Gujjars residing in and around Corbett Tiger Reserve, India’, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 18 (1): 57—72.

1WG1A (2019a) Annual Report 2019. International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs (1WGIA): Copenhagen.

1WGIA (2019b) The Indigenous World 2019. International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs (IWGIA): Copenhagen.

Lascorgeix, A. and Kothari, A. (2009) ‘Displacement and relocation of protected areas: A synthesis and analysis of case studies’, Economic & Political Weekly, 44: 37-47.

Lindsey, P.A., Balme, G.A., Booth, V.R. and Midlane, N. (2012) ‘The significance of African lions for the financial viability of trophy hunting and the maintenance of wild land’, PLoS ONE, 7 (1): e29332. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0029332.

Lunstrum, E. and Ybarra, M. (2018) ‘Deploying difference: security threat narratives and state displacement from protected areas’, Conservation and Society, 16 (2): 114—124.

Mahapatra, A.K., Tewari, D.D. and Baboo, B. (2015) ‘Displacement, deprivation and development: The impact of relocation on income and livelihood of tribes in Similipal Tiger and Biosphere Reserve, India’, Environmental Management, 56: 420-432.

Massé, F. and Lunstrum, E. (2016) ‘Accumulation by securitization: Commercial poaching, neoliberal conservation, and the creation of the new wildlife frontiers’, Geoforum, 69: 227-237.

McClanahan, T.R. and Mangi, S. (2000) ‘Spillover of exploitable fishes from a marine park and its effect on the adjacent fishery’, Ecological Applications, 10: 1792-1805.

Milgroom, J. and Spierenburg, M. (2008) ‘Induced volition: Resettlement from the Limpopo National Park, Mozambique’, Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 28: 435-448.

Mowforth, M. and Munt, I. (2016) Tourism and Sustainability: Development, Globalisation and New Tourism in the Third World (4th edition). Routledge: London, New York.

Nelson, F. and Blomley, T. (2010) ‘Peasants’ forests and the King’s game? Institutional divergence and convergence in Tanzania’s forestry and wildlife sector’, in Nelson, F. (ed.) Community Rights, Conservation & Contested Land. Earthscan: London, Washington DC, pp. 79-105.

Ngoitiko, M., Sinandei, M., Meitaya P. and Nelson, F. (2010) ‘Pastoral activists: Negotiating power imbalances in the Tanzanian Serengeti’, in Nelson, F. (eds) Community Rights, Conservation & Contested Land. Earthscan: London, Washington, DC, pp. 269-289.

Ojeda, D. (2012) ‘Green pretexts: Ecotourism, neoliberal conservation and land grabbing in Tayrona National Natural Park, Colombia’, The Journal of Peasant Studies, 39 (2): 357-375.

Otsuki, K., Achá, D. and Wijnhoud, J.D. (2017) ‘After the consent: Re-imaging participatory land governance in Massingir, Mozambique’, Geoforum, 83: 153—163.

Paterniti, M. (2017) ‘Should we kill animals to save them?’, National Geographic, 232 (4): 70-99.

Pearce, F. (2012) The Land Grabbers: The New Fight over who Owns the Earth. Bacon Press: Boston, MA.

Porokwa, E. (2018) ‘Tanzania’, in IWGIA (ed.) The Indigenous World in 2018. International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs (IWGIA): Copenhagen, pp. 482-492.

Quammen, D. (2016) ‘The paradox of the park’, National Geographic, 229 (5): 54-91.

Rodgers, G. (2009) ‘The faint footprint of man: representing race, place and conservation on the Mozambique-South Africa Borderland’, Journal of Refugee Studies, 22 (3): 392-412.

Shahabuddin, G. and Bhamidipati, P.L. (2014) ‘Conservation-induced displacement: Recent perspectives from Indi’, Environmental Justice, 7 (5): 122-129.

Witter, R. and Satterfield, T. (2014) ‘Invisible losses and the logics of resettlement compensation’, Conservation Biology, 28 (5): 1394—1402.

Media sources/websites

Alvarez, N.N. (2019) ‘Las batallas del parque Tayrona, más allá de la concesión [The battles of Tayrona Park, beyond the concession]’, 30 August. Available at: a-406700 (accessed 23 June 2020).

Ayyar, K. (2018) ‘How India’s conservationists are fighting to save half of the world’s tigers’, Time Magazine, 28 July. Available at: 1-tiger-day-tigers-india-conservation/ (accessed 18 December 2018).

Edmond, R. (2013) ‘Colombia’s environment minister expresses concerns over tourism plans in national park’, Colombia Reports, 11 January. Available at: -plans-in-national-park/ (accessed 23 June 2020).

El Espectador (2013) ‘Fallo prohíbe el turismo en sitios sagrados del Tayrona Judgement prohibits tourism in Tayrona’s sacred sites]’, 14 February. Available at: (accessed 23 June 2020).

El Espectador (2017) ‘Los Ciruelos pide más de $6.000 millones por no haber podido construir en el Tayrona [Los Ciruelos asks for more than $ 6,000 million for not having been able to build in Tayrona]’, 28 July. Available at: www.elespectador. com/noticias/judicial/los-ciruelos-pide-mas-de-6000-millones-por-no-haber-podido -construir-en-el-tayrona/ (accessed 23 June 2020).

El Heraldo (2011) ‘El hotel Six Senses Tayrona: Un anuncio con muchos peros [The Six Senses Hotel Tayrona: An announcement with many buts]’, 17 October. Available at: eros-42151 (accessed 23 June 2020).

Florez Arias, J.M. (2019) ‘Suspenden concesión turística del Tayrona [Tayrona tourism concession suspended]’, El Colombiano, 19 December. Available at: F12172345 (accessed 24 June 2020).

O’Gorman, J. (2013) ‘Tayrona eco-tourism stopped again’, Colombia Reports, 13 February. Available at: in/ (accessed 23 June 2020).

Schertow, J.A. (2013) ‘Colombia: Court suspends eco-tourism project in Tayrona National Park’, 18 February. Available at: -court-suspends-eco-tourism-project-in-tayrona-national-park/ (accessed 23 June 2020).

Seguimiento (2019) ‘Sigue el pleito legal de Los Ciruelos sobre construcción en el Tayrona [The legal lawsuit of Los Ciruelos on construction in Tayrona continues]’, 4 February. Available at: to-legal-de-los-ciruelos-sobre-construccion-en-el-tayrona-22161 (accessed 24 June 2020).

Survival International (n.d.) ‘Background briefing - Parks and peoples’. Available at: (accessed 31 December 2018).

Trent, C. (2012) ‘Indigenous divided on construction of Tayrona resort’, Colombia Reports, 31 October. Available at: d-on-construction-of-tayrona-resort/ (accessed 23 June 2020).

Vidal, J. (2016) ‘The tribes paying the brutal price of conservation’, The Guardian, 28 August. Available at: www.theguardian.coin/global-developinent/2016/aug/28/exile s-human-cost-of-conservation-indigenous-peoples-eco-tourism (accessed 31 December 2018).

Villegas, L.V. (2019) ‘Parque National Natural Tayrona’, 1 March. Available at: (accessed 23 June 2020).

< Prev   CONTENTS   Source   Next >