Big Data in Animal Production Management
Big Data has big potential to transform animal production methods and farm management. Since 2013> the number of articles has been growing and they concern mainly dairy cattle (Lokhorst, Mol and Kamphuis, 2019). The main areas where Big Data can be used are feeding, e.g., forecasting daily intake of cows (Steeneveld and Hogeveen, 2015) and predicting cow’s health and fertility (Harty and Healy, 2016) as well as individual and whole herd performance (Yan, Chen, Akcan, Lim and Yang, 2015). White, Amrine and Larson (2018) presented interesting possibilities for the use of Big Data in cattle breeding (2018), who described the possibility of detecting oestrus and bovine diseases based on movement patterns (distance, pace, and movement method). Tracks the position of each animal at short intervals and compares the results with patterns helping to determine whether or not the movements follow the correct pattern (White, Amrine and Larson, 2018; Fernandez-Carrion et al., 2017). Quality, visualization, and interpretation of data (Hermans et al., 2017, 2018) were also dealing with reproduction of cows. A farmer quickly received information about heat in one of the females in the herd increases the chances of successful insemination. Green et al. (2016) indicate the possibility of using Big Data to control mastitis in cows. Tire authors point out the possibility of forecasting which cows are at risk of disease, which they think is their main advantage. Preventing disease or treating it early reduces the amount of medication used and, importantly, improves animal welfare.
Big Data can also be used to assess the performance of fattening cattle as described by Hewitt, Green and Hudson (2018) to monitor the behavior and growth of pigs (Pineiro et al., 2019) or to achieve rapid genetic progress through genome analysis (Morota, Ventura, Silva, Koyama, and Fernando 2018).
These are just a few examples of the use of Big Data in animal production management, and soon there will be more and more of them because the equipment necessary for precision production is cheaper, and IT technologies and computers are becoming more user-friendly. Table 7-1 shows the main aspects of using Big Data in agriculture.
Advantages of Big Data in Farm Management
A review of the literature indicates many benefits that can be gained by using Big Data in farm management. Table 7-2 presents the most important of them. Tire use of Big Data helps farmers better control the production process (Subramanian, Chen and Redd, 2018). They can identify existing problems faster and receive a warning before they occur (Sonka, 2016).
Using Big Data significantly increases production effects (Australian Farm Institute, 2018; Chandra Sekhar, Udaykumar, Kumar and Sekhar, 2018) and
Table 7.1 Effects of Big Data Use in Crop and Animal Production Management
Crop Production |
Source |
Animal Production |
Source |
Improved forecasting of yields |
Ribarics (2016) |
Improved forecasting of animal production |
Faverjon et al. (2019) |
Real-time decisions and alerts based on data from fields and equipment |
Pineiro et al. (2019) |
Real-time decisions and alerts based on data from animals and equipment |
Ribarics (2016) |
Optimal timing of shipping crops to the market |
Ribarics (2016) |
Optimal timing of shipping livestock to the market |
Ribarics (2016) |
Better optimized use of seeds/ fertilizers/pesticides |
Poppe and Renwick (2015); Ribarics (2016) |
Better veterinary management and inspection of herds |
White, Amrine and Larson (2018) |
Implementation of new methods improving yields, e.g., weed protection |
Pineiro et al. (2019) |
Implementation of new methods improving animal production |
Faverjon et al. (2019) |
Better supply management, cheaper (seeds, fertilizers, pesticides) and lower costs of storage |
Wolfert, Verdouw and Bogaard (2017); Lokhorst, Mol and Kamphuis (2019) |
Better supply management, cheaper feed for animals, lower costs of storage |
Wolfert, Verdouw and Bogaard (2017); Lokhorst, Mol and Kamphuis (2019) |
Identify weeds |
Bronson and Knezevic (2016) |
Optimal climate in buildings where animals are kept |
Ribarics (2016) |
(Continued)
Management in the Era of Big Data
Table 7.1 (Continued) Effects of Big Data Use in Crop and Animal Production Management
Crop Production |
Source |
Animal Production |
Source |
Higher yields |
Wolfert, Verdouw and Bogaard (2017) |
Better health and animal performance |
Faverjon et al. (2019) |
Optimal irrigation of fields |
Ribarics (2016) |
Better control of water usage at buildings for animals |
Australian Farm Institute (2018) |
Precise and effective genome editing for plant breeding |
Tantalaki, Souravlas and Roumeliotis (2019) |
Precise and effective genome editing for animal breeding |
Australian Farm Institute (2018) |
Improved forecasting of weather |
Ribarics (2016) |
Improving sustainability |
Faverjon et al. (2019) |
Spoilage reduction (crops, seeds, fertilizers, etc.) |
Waga and Rabah (2014) |
Higher animal welfare |
White, Amrine and Larson, (2018); Faverjon et al. (2019) |
Source: Own elaboration.
Big Data in Modern Farm Management ■ 103
Table 7.2 Advantages of Using Big Data in Farm Management
Specifications |
Source |
Supply data sets for improved decision making and improve analysis and models |
Wolfert, Verdouw and Bogaard (2017); Coble, Mishra, Ferrell and Griffin (2018) |
Higher accuracy, robustness, flexibility, and generalization performance of Big Data processing techniques |
Tantalaki, Souravlas and Roumeliotis (2019) |
Better control of the production processes |
Wolfert, Verdouw and Bogaard (2017) |
Better personalized on-farm management practices |
Tantalaki, Souravlas and Roumeliotis (2019) |
Real-time decisions and data-driven decisions |
Poppe and Renwick (2015); Wolfert, Verdouw and Bogaard (2017); Tantalaki, Souravlas and Roumeliotis (2019) |
Integration of production and business performance |
Ribarics (2016) |
Increase of farm productivity |
Henry (2015); Griepentrog, Uppenkamp and Hörner (2017); Coble, Mishra, Ferrell and Griffin (2018) |
Increase labor productivity |
Poppe and Renwick (2015) |
Improving economic gain and profitability |
Sonka (2016); Wolfert, Verdouw and Bogaard (2017) |
Improving efficiency |
Faulkner et al. (2014); Wolfert, Verdouw and Bogaard (2017) |
Reduction of support costs |
Wolfert, Verdouw and Bogaard (2017) |
Reduction of energy and water use |
Ribarics (2016) |
Reduction of environmental impact |
Sonka (2016); Coble, Mishra, Ferrell and Griffin (2018) |
Better forecasting crops, demand for seeds, fertilizers, animal feed |
Ribarics (2016); Sykuta (2016) |
Better forecasting prices and market demand |
Ribarics (2016); Shekhar, Schnäble, LeBauer, Baylis and VanderWaal (2017) |
Tighter relationships between farmer suppliers and buyers |
Ribarics (2016); Griepentrog, Uppenkamp and Hörner (2017) |
(Continued)
Table 7.2 (Continued) Advantages of Using Big Data in Farm Management
Specifications |
Source |
Improve food security |
Tong, Hong and JingHua (2015); Wolfert, Verdouw and Bogaard (2017) |
Better risk management |
Wolfert, Verdouw and Bogaard (2017); Kamilaris, Kartakoullis and Prenafeta-Bold (2017); Ferrell and Griffin (2018) |
Access to individual data anytime and from anywhere |
Wolfert, Verdouw and Bogaard (2017) |
Benchmarking |
Wolfert, Verdouw and Bogaard (2017) |
Automation of agricultural procedures |
Tantalaki, Souravlas and Roumeliotis (2019) |
Boost innovations |
Henry (2015) |
More timely scheduling maintaining of equipment |
Ribarics (2016) |
Source: Own elaboration based on the literature.
economic effects such as improving profitability and efficiency, reducing operating costs (Delgado, Short, Roberts and Vandenberg, 2019).
Hie possibilities offered by Big Data are huge. In addition to forecasting crop yields and animal performance (Lima et al., 2018), they help you decide what and where to grow, when to sow and plant, how to feed individual animals, when and what to do with their breeding, and even when, what, and where to sell.
Tire use of Big Data improves risk management (Allepuz, Martin-Valls, Casal and Mateu, 2018). Farmers can, thanks to Big Data, assess the likelihood of precipitation, frost, crop failure, pest infestation, or pathogens (Bauriegel, Giebel, Geyer, Schmidt and Herppich, 2011; Bendre, Thool and Thool, 2016; Astill, Fraser, Dara and Sharif, 2018; Fernandez, 2018). Tire use of Big Data increases food security (Ahearn, Armbrusterb and Young, 2016).
Wireless data transfer technology permits farmers to access to individual data from anywhere (Wolfert, Verdouw and Bogaard, 2017).
Disadvantages of Big Data in Farm Management
Tire literature also mentions many inconveniences and problems associated with the use of Big Data in agriculture (Table 7-3)-
The huge amount of data, on the one hand, is an advantage, and on the other hand, an inconvenience. Large data sets are necessary to properly predict the
Table 7.3 Disadvantages of Using Big Data in Farm Management
Specifications |
Source |
System need a lot of data which are highly dimensional |
Tantalaki, Souravlas and Roumeliotis (2019) |
High costs and investments |
Wolfert, Verdouwand Bogaard (2017) |
Cybersecurity issue |
Tantalaki, Souravlas and Roumeliotis (2019) |
Problems with data ownership |
Carbonell (2016); Sykuta (2016); Coble, Mishra, Ferrell and Griffin (2018); Faverjon et al. (2019) |
Need of wireless infrastructure for connectivity |
Mark, Griffin and Whitacre (2016); Barone, Williams and Micklos (2017) |
Data storage issue |
Tantalaki, Souravlas and Roumeliotis (2019); Barone, Williams and Micklos (2017) |
Information asymmetry between farmers and large agribusiness software companies |
Ribarics (2016); Carbonell (2016) |
Threatened autonomy of farmers |
Wolfert, Verdouwand Bogaard (2017) |
Big Data will enable farmers to be replaced by autonomous machines |
Henry (2015) |
Changing the way farmers are operating |
Drucker (2014); Poppe and Renwick (2015) |
Farmers' knowledge is about to be replaced by algorithms |
Wolfert, Verdouwand Bogaard (2017) |
Changes the farm organization |
Poppe and Renwick (2015) |
Complexity to use, requires considerable technical skills to handle analysis methods |
Tantalaki, Souravlas and Roumeliotis (2019); Barone, Williams and Micklos (2017) |
Source: Own elaboration based on the literature.
consequences of events and give correct recommendations, unfortunately, some information is difficult to obtain, especially when it concerns a long production cycle. In the case of cereal production, e.g., for data on sowing or plant growth, you have to wait until the next growing season, i.e. you can only get it once a year. For this reason, the preparation time needed to forecast the data set is long. According to Mark, Griffin and Whitacre (2016), sending large amounts of data requires appropriate infrastructure, the construction of which is extremely expensive and only a few operators can afford such an investment. The asymmetry of information that Ribarics (2016) mentions raises concerns. Farmers, in order to have access to modern technologies, reveal a lot of private information without full knowledge by whom and how it will be used. Meanwhile, software providers can aggregate large amounts of private data and develop new products by combining their privileged position with unique access to highly detailed, private data (Ribarics, 2016). Therefore, issues regarding the method and place of data storage become important. It seems that ethical issues, data ownership, and security will be a problem that needs to be solved for a long time (Carbonell, 2016; Sykuta, 2016; Tantalaki, Souravlas and Roumeliotis, 2019).
Another disadvantage is still the low knowledge of advanced technologies among farmers around the world (Sharma and Kaushik, 2019). And yet using Big Data requires considerable skills (Tantalaki, Souravlas and Roumeliotis, 2019). It is comforting that the research of Sharma and Kaushik (2019) shows that young farmers belonging to the new generation are positive about the use of advanced technologies in farm management and more often use it in practice.
Farmers should also consider the need for investment. Purchase of equipment for data collection, license fees can be a significant barrier to the use of advanced technologies in agriculture, especially on small farms (Long, Blok and Coninx, 2016; Sharma and Kaushik, 2019).
Wolfert, Verdouw and Bogaard (2017) underline that the use of Big Data may threaten the autonomy of farmers and change the way they are operating (Drucker, 2014). What is more, farmers’ expertise and knowledge, is about to be replaced by algorithms (Wolfert, Verdouw and Bogaard, 2017). Following the suggestion of Henry (2015), one day farmers themselves will be replaced by an artificial intelligence and autonomous machines.