Developing a critical voice

Table of Contents:

There are many ways for social work educators to encourage students to find and use their critical voice. One approach 1 have taken in my teaching is a three-pronged focus: firstly, to provide a critical deconstruction of the way mainstream media promulgates stigmatising discourses about service users and people in poverty. This element involves analysing articles, and the images and headlines that accompany them. Developing media awareness involves an examination of media framing. In class we explore the links between social problems, service users’ realities and media framing. Entman (1993: 53) defines framing as the selection of “some aspects of a perceived reality [to] make them more salient in a communicating text, in such a way as to promote a particular problem definition, causal interpretation, moral evaluation, and/or treatment recommendation for the item described”.

Words or phrases may trigger ideological and emotional responses as well as rhetorical devices such as metaphors, catch phrases and imagery; news-handlers use reasoning devices that draw on causal attributions. These powerful (but typically unnoticed) mechanisms affect viewers’ judgments of responsibility and causality. In the New Zealand context, 1 have shared examples of the way poverty stigma is racialised in both mainstream and social media (Beddoe, 2014). The examples are unpacked to demonstrate the ideologies that underpin phrases such as ‘feral’ and ‘troubled’ families. Another persuasive example of such framing is found in the framing of discourse about asylum seekers in Australasia. An analysis of politicians’ language and public discourse noted the powerful ways in which asylum seekers are othered and reviled as ‘invading hordes’ (Bogen and Marlowe, 2015).

The second focus contains an examination of social media and the potential for social workers to use social networks for a more politically engaged practice (Stanfield and Beddoe, 2013, 2016). Social media are increasingly recognised as providing an excellent platform for social workers to participate in political discussion and activism. The option for anonymity provides a counter to the concerns about potential or current employer scrutiny and the threat of consequences of failing to preserve political neutrality. A risk averse professional approach tends to dominate contemporary social work discussion about social media. There are of course valid concerns and 1 do not mean to minimise these; however, we do risk missing out on important opportunities for social activism if that is where the discussion of social media stalls. Shifting the focus away from such a risk-averse positioning involves presenting blogs and independent news websites as legitimate sources of information and activism. Blogs with relevant social work and social policy content form part of recommended course reading whereby the lecturer demonstrates professional use of social media. This is of course a departure from the rigid academic stance that the internet is not a valid source of quality material for academic work. Rather students are encouraged to be engaged, discerning and critical users of social media.

Finally, 1 have supported students to write blog posts on social work and political problems as a graded course requirement. If we are to avoid students and (social workers) from staying with that notion that politics is a ‘spectator sport’ we need to work with what we have. Social media offers an opportunity for safe expression. I created a blog “713 Students 2017: The social work issues blog”1 which 1 host on my Wordl’ress site. In the most recent delivery of the course year there were two assignments: the first to write a post on some of the big social work issues of the moment, including: new policies in child protection and youth services, mental health resource and service issues, social investment, mis(use) and use of‘big data’, and the major public issue of calls for an inquiry into abuse in state care. The students’ brief for the second post was to write a short blog post on aspects of professional practice in Aotearoa New Zealand social work. 1 was delighted to publish blog posts on a variety of topics which incorporate some great links to resources. All comments were moderated. Many bloggers chose to be anonymous and used a pseudonym.

In the main part students enjoyed the opportunity to write freely as themselves about issues that incited their passion and enthusiasm. Excerpts from the students’ blog include the following examples:

Accordingly, irrespective of the field ot social work you are currently practicing in, as risks are generally higher for already vulnerable and disadvantaged people, we will be increasingly exposed to adverse effects of climate change. Therefore, I urge you to take on board an understanding and openness to incorporate the natural environment into your practice now, as our skills and knowledge in this field will be of necessity rather than choice in the very near future. The more we can do now, the better prepared we will be for these eventualities. (Pseudonym: Vicky Michaels)

From “Musing on calls for an inquiry in abuse in state care”, another blog post addresses social work’s muted response:

1 could not find much online where social workers have voiced their opinion on the matter and there seems to be an almost uncanny silence. The underpinning principle of social work is social justice and one cannot deny that the issue of abuse of children in state care is one which cries out for social justice. But where do social workers stand on this issue? Is social work, which is supposed to work with principles of social justice values, reduced to what Lester Salamon (1994: 118) calls “the myth of pure virtue” where workplace surveillance and managerialism have turned social work value systems parallel to that of neoliberal value systems, preoccupied with turning workers into self-reliant, utility-maximising individuals who do not require cooperation from others and have no interest in mobilising society for collective action for social change? (Pseudonym: Atticus Finch)

From “Social work: Putting out fires for those who ‘deserve’ it”.

Practice has become “child-centred”, which itself is not a bad thing, but in doing so, the child is isolated from their whánau context, and the poverty they experience is separated from that of their adults. The distinction between child and adult poverty, the deserving and undeserving poor, is a momentous misnomer. You simply cannot lift children out of poverty without also bringing their adults. That’s like putting out a fire in just the child’s room when the whole house is alight. (Lauren Bartley)

Conclusion

If we are to challenge doxa within social worker education we must allow for some time to untether our teaching and assessment practice from mainstream curriculum and engage students in deconstruction of current discourses. This chapter has suggested that a focus on political discourse, analysis of the influence of mainstream media and a positive engagement with social media helps students develop their critical voice in a safe way. It is one of many such strategies but for this educator has been satisfying and encouraging. Readers are encouraged to read a selection of student posts on a major New Zealand controversy to see how they have engaged critically with a range of media and sources with creativity beyond the confines of an essay.2

Notes

  • 1 https://713students2017thesocialworkissuesblog.wordpress.com/
  • 2 https://713students2017thesocialworkissuesblog.wordpress.com/

References

Aotearoa NZ Association of Social Workers (2013) Code of Ethics. Online version. Retrieved from: https:// anzasw.nz/wp-content/uploads/Code-of-Ethics.pdf [Accessed 01.10.18]

Bartley, L. (2017). Factors that influence young social work students’ expression of political opinion and participation in activism. Unpublished literature review. Auckland, New Zealand.

Beck, U. (2000). The cosmopolitan perspective: Sociology of the second age of modernity’. British Journal of Sociology, 51(1): 79—105.

Beddoe, L. (2014). Feral families, troubled families: The rise of the underclass in New Zealand 2011—2013. New Zealand Sociology, 29(3): 51—68.

Beddoe, L. & Keddell, E. (2016). Informed outrage: Tackling shame and stigma in poverty education in social work. Ethics and Social Welfare, 10(2): 149-162. doi: 10.1080/17496535.2016.1159775

Bogen, R. & Marlowe, J. (2015). Asylum discourse in New Zealand: Moral panic and a culture of indifference.

Australian Social Work, 1-12. doi: 10.1080/0312407x.2015.1076869

Bourdieu, P. (2003) Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1999). An impossible mission. Translated by Priscilla Parkhurst Ferguson (Ed.), The weight of the world: Social suffering in contemporary society (pp. 189—202). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

Bnskman, L. (2013). Courageous ethnographers or agents of the state: Challenges for social work. Critical and Radical Social ITorÁ.’, 1(1): 51-66. doi: 10.1332/204986013x665956

Bywaters, P., Brady, G., Sparks, T. & Bos, E. (2016). Child welfare inequalities: New evidence, further questions. Child & Family Social Work, 21(3): 369-380. doi: 10.1111/cfs.l2154

Crossley, S. (2015). ‘Realising the (troubled) family’, ‘crafting the neoliberal state’. Families, Relationships and Societies, 5(2): 263—279.

Darroch, J. (2015). Political neutrality: How politically active can social workers be? Retrieved from: http://www.reimagmmgsocialwork.nz/2015/05/pohtical-neutrahty-%C2%AD-how-politically-active-can-social-workers-be/ [Accessed 01.10.18|

Darroch, J. (2017). Social justice: What the social work profession’s commitment means in practice. Unpublished thesis (Master of Social Work). University of Auckland, Auckland.

Duvnjak, A. & Fraser, H. (2013). Targeting the ‘hard to reach’: Re/producing stigma? Critical and Radical Social Work, 1(2): 167-182. 10.1332/204986013x673245

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4): 51-58. doi:10.1111/j. 1460-2466.1993.tbO1304.x

Featherstone, B. (2016). Telling different stories about poverty, inequality, child abuse and neglect.

Families, Relationships and Societies, 5(1): 147—153. doi:10.1332/204674316X14540714620085

Ferguson, I. & Lavalette, M. (2013). Crisis, austerity and the future(s) of social work in the UK. Critical and Radical Social Work, 1(1): 95-110. doi: 10.1332/204986013x665992

Ferguson, I. & Woodward, R. (2009). Radical social work in practice: Making a difference. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.

Garrett, P. M. (2007). Making social work more Bourdieusian: Why the social professions should critically engage with the work of Pierre Bourdieu. European Journal of Social Work, 10(2): 225—243.

Gray, M. & Webb, S. A. (eds). (2013). The new politics of social work. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Grey, S. & Sedgwick, C. (2013). The contract state and constrained democracy: The community and voluntary sector under threat. Policy Quarterly 9(3): 3—10.

Gupta, A. & Blumhardt, H. (2017). Poverty, exclusion and child protection practice: The contribution of ‘the politics of recognition and respect’. European Journal of Social Work, 1—13. doi: 10.1080/13691457 .2017.1287669

Hamilton, D. & Faun, D. (2001). Social workers’ political participation. Journal of Social Work Education, 37(2): 321-332. doi:10.1080/10437797.2001.10779057

Harland, T., Tidswell, T., Everett, D., Hale, L. & Pickering, N. (2010). Neoliberahsm and the academic as critic and conscience of society. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(1): 85—96. doi: 10.1080/13562510903487917

Harvey, D. (2010). The enigma of capitalism and the crisis of capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University’ Press.

Hyslop, I. (2016a). Neoliberahsm and social work identity. European Journal of Social Work, 1—12. doi:10.1 080/13691457.2016.1255927

Hyslop, I. (2016b). Social work in the teeth of a gale: A resilient counter-discourse in neoliberal times. Critical and Radical Social Work. http://dx.doi.org/10.1332/204986016X14519919041316

International Association Schools of Social Work (2005). Global standards for social work education. Joint Statement by IASSW and IFSW. Retneved from: https://www.iassw-aiets.org/global-standards-for-social-work-education-and-training/ [Accessed 01 Oct. 2018]

International Federation of Social Workers (2014). Global definition of the social work profession. Retrieved from: https://www.iassw-aiets.org/global-standards-for-social-work-education-and-training/ [Accessed 01 Oct. 2018)

Keddell, E. (2015). The ethics of predictive risk modelling in the Aotearoa/New Zealand child welfare context: Child abuse prevention or neo-hberal tool? Critical Social Policy, 35(1): 69—88. doi: 10.1177/0261018314543224

Kushin, M. J. & Yamamoto, M. (2010). Did social media really matter? College students’ use of online media and political decision making in the 2008 election. Mass Communication and Society, 13(5): 608-630.

Krumer-Nevo, M. (2017). Poverty and the political: Wresting the political out of and into social work theory, research and practice. European Journal of Social Work, 20(6): 811—822. doi:l 0.1080/13691457. 2017.1318264

McKendnck, D. & Webb, S. A. (2014). Taking a political stance in social work. Critical and Radical Social Work, 2(3): 357-369.

Morley, C. (2016). Promoting activism through cntical social work education: The impact of global capitalism and neoliberalism on social work and social work education. Critical and Radical Social Work, 4(1): 39-57.

Morley, C., Macfarlane, S. & Ablett, P. (2014). Engaging with social work: A critical introduction. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

O’Connor, D. J., Thomas, E., White, K., & Morley, C. (2016). The challenges, triumphs and learning from participating in an Australian social work students’ activist group. Critical and Radical Social kPbrk, 4(2): 289-299.

Preston, S., George, P. & Silver, S. (2014). Field education in social work: The need for reimagining. Critical Social Work, 15(1): 57-72.

Russell, A. (2017). Competent solidarity: The alternative for professional social work. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 29(2): 137-143. doi:10.11157/anzswj-vol29iss2id406

Salamon, L. (1994) The nse of the nonprofit sector. Foreign Affairs, 73(4): 109—122.

State Services Commission (2010). Political neutrality guidance. Retrieved from: http://www.ssc.govt.nz/ pohtical-neutrality-guidance [Accessed 21.12.16]

State Services Commission (2014). Guidance for the 2014 election period: State servants, political parties, and elections. Retrieved from: https://www.ssc.govt.nz/sites/all/files/election-guidance-2014. pdf [Accessed 21.12.16]

Stanfield, D. & Beddoe, L. (2013). Social work and the media: A collaborative challenge. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 25(4): 41-51.

Stanfield, D. & Beddoe, L. (2016). Social work and social media in Aotearoa New Zealand: Educating social workers across shifting boundaries of social work identity. Social Work Education, 35(3), 284—296. doi: 10.1080/02615479.2016.1154663

Swank, E. W. (2012). Predictors of political activism among social work students. Journal of Social Work Education, 48(2), 245-266. doi: 10.5175/jswe.2012.200900111

Tyler, I. (2013). Revolting subjects: Social abjection and resistance in neoliberal Britain. London: Zed Books.

Weiss, I. & Kaufman, R. (2006). Educating for social action. Journal of Policy Practice, 5: 5—28. doi: 10.1300/ J508v05n01_02

42

Insinuating

 
Source
< Prev   CONTENTS   Source   Next >