Concluding thoughts

In this chapter, we extend gender structure theorizing into online gendered technocultures. We highlight scholarship that challenges assumptions of gender neutrality by arguing that online, like offline, spaces are gendered through the promotion of masculine values and norms. Scholarship on conflict in organizational contexts adopts a similar gender-neutral positioning; however, conflict, too, is a gendered process. Given our focus on online technocultures, conflict is an emerging area of inquiry in online spaces. Considering the rise of gender-based threats and violence online that are cultivated vis-à-vis toxic technocultures, we use Bumble as a case of both a technoculture and organization that is actively engaged in addressing gendered conflict online through the promotion and cultivation of gender equitable strategies and processes. Through organizing and creating an alternative technoculture that reverses gender roles and norms for communication,

Bumble’s promotion of “Women First” serves as a crucial action-orientation that positioned the organization as a key stakeholder in addressing and reducing online gendered conflict. This positioning aids in promoting gender equity at interpersonal, organizational, and industrywide levels.

Notes

  • 1 John G. Oetzel and Stella Ting-Toomey, The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Communication: Integrating Theory, Research, and Practice (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2013).
  • 2 Patrice M. Buzzanell, “Gender and Feminist Theory” in Origins and Traditions of Organizational Communication:A Comprehensive Introduction to the Field, ed. Anne Nicotera (New York: Routledge 2020), 250-269.
  • 3 Tindernightmares, “Unspirational on Instagram: ‘VOM’,” Instagram, accessed May 08, 2019, www. mstagram.eom/p/BqvApTmHE2U/.
  • 4 Aaron Hess and Carlos Flores, “Simply More than Swiping Left: A Critical Analysis of Toxic Masculine Performances on Tinder Nightmares,” New Media & Society 20, no. 3 (2016): 1085—1102, https://doi. org/10.1177/1461444816681540; Emma A. Jane,“‘Your a Ugly, Whonsh, Slut,’” Feminist Media Studies 14, no. 4 (2014): 531-46, https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2012.741073.
  • 5 Kate Hakala,“This Is Why Men OutnumberWomenTwo-to-One onTinder,”Mic,May 07,2019,accessed May 08, 2019, www.mic.com/articles/110774/two-thirds-of-tinder-users-are-men-here-s-why.
  • 6 Emma Alice Jane, “‘Back to the Kitchen, Cunt’: Speaking the Unspeakable about Online Misogyny,” Continuum 28, no. 4 (2014): 558-570, https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2014.924479.
  • 7 Andrea Braithwaite, “It’s about Ethics in Games Journalism? Gamergaters and Geek Masculinity,” Social Media + Society 2, no. 4 (2016): 1—10, https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2056305116672484; Adrienne Massanari,“#Gamergate and the Fappenmg: How Reddit’s Algorithm, Governance, and Culture Support Toxic Technocultures,” New Media & Society 19, no. 3 (2015): 329—346, https://doi.org/10.! 177% 2F1461444815608807.
  • 8 Michael Salter, “Privates in the Online Public: Sex (Ting) and Reputation on Social Media,” New Media & Society 18, no. 11 (2016): 117, https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1461444815604133.
  • 9 Whitney Phillips, This Is Why We Can't Have Nice Things: Mapping the Relationship Between Online Trolling and Mainstream Culture (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2015); Karla Mantilla, Gendertrolling: How Misogyny Went Viral (Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger, 2015).
  • 10 Bridget Blodgett and Anastasia Salter,“Ghostbusters Is for Boys: Understanding Geek Masculinity’s Role m the Alt-Right,” Communication Culture & Critique 11, no. 1 (2018): 133—146, https://doi.org/10.1093/ ccc/tcx003; Caitlin Lawson,“Platform Vulnerabilities: Harassment and Misogynoir in the Digital Attack on Leslie Jones,” Information, Communication &Society 21,110.6 (2018): 818—833, https://d0i.0rg/l 0.1080/ 1369118X.2018.1437203.
  • 11 Aristea Fotopoulou, “Digital and Networked by Default? Women’s Organisations and the Social Imaginary of Networked Feminism,” New Media & Society 18, no. 6 (2016): 1—17, https://doi.org/10. 1177%2F1461444814552264.
  • 12 Jessica Bennett, “With Her Dating App, Women Are 111 Control,” The New York limes, March 18, 2017, accessed May 08, 2019, www.nytimes.eom/2017/03/18/fashion/bumble-femimst-dating-app-whitney-wolfe.html.
  • 13 Bennett,“With Her Dating App,” para 4.
  • 14 Bennett, “With Her Dating App,” para 5; Leora Yashari, “Meet the Tinder Co-Founder Trying to Change Online Dating Forever,” Vanity Fair, August 07, 2015, accessed May 08, 2019, www.vanityfair, com/culture/2015/08/bumble-app-whitney- wolfe.
  • 15 Suzy D’Enbeau. “Gender and Organizing” in The International Encyclopedia of Organizational Communication, eds Craig R. Scott and Laurie K. Lewis (Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2017a), 1—13, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118955567.wbieoc085; Jessica A. Pauly and Patrice M. Buzzanell, “Gender and sexuality,” in Movements in Organizational Communication Research: Current Issues and Future Directions, eds Jamie McDonald and Rahul Mitra (New York: Routledge, 2019), 116—134.
  • 16 Barbara J. Risman, “Gender as a Social Structure,” Gender & Society 18, no. 4 (2004): 431, www.jstor.org/ stable/4149444.
  • 17 Candace West and Don H. Zimmerman, “Doing Gender,” Gender & Society 1, no. 2 (1987): 125—151, www.jstor.org/stable/189945.

Risman, “Gender as a Social Structure,” 432.

Patrice M. Buzzanell, “Gaining a Voice: Feminist Organizational Communication,” Management Communication Quarterly 7, no. 4 (1994): 339—383, https://doi.org/10J 177%2F0893318994007004001; West and Zimmerman, “Doing Gender,” 128.

|oan Acker, “Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations,” Gender & Society 4, no. 2 ‘(1990): 139-58, https://doi.org/10.1177%2F089124390004002002.

Risman, “Gender as a Social Structure,” 436; Barbara J. Risman, “From Doing to Undoing: Gender as We Know It,” Gender & Society 23, no. 1 (2009): 81—84, www.jstor.org/stable/20676752.

Silvia Gherardi, “The Gender We Think, the Gender We Do in Our Everyday Organizational Lives,” Human Relations 47, no. 6 (1994): 591—610, https://doi.org/10.1177%2F001872679404700602; Buzzanell, “Gaining a Voice,” 342.

Acker, “Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies,” 149—150; Gherardi, “The Gender We Think,” 599.

Buzzanell, “Gaining a Voice,” 340; Gherardi, “The Gender We Think,” 599.

Gherardi, “The Gender We Think,” 605.

Patrice. M. Buzzanell, and Kristen Lucas, “Gendered Stories of Career: Unfolding Discourses of Time, Space, and Identity,” in SL4GL Handbook of Gender and Communication, eds Bonnie J. Dow, and Julia T. Wood (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2006), 161-178.

Karen Lee Ashcraft,“The Glass Slipper:‘Incorporating’ Occupational Identity in Management Studies,” The Academy of Management Review 38, no. 1 (2013): 6—31, www.jstor.org/stable/23416300.

Latonya J.Trotter,“Making A Career: Reproducing Gender within a Predominately Female Profession,” Gender & Society 31, no. 4 (2017): 503-525, https://doi.org/10.! 177%2F0891243217716115.

Maxine Leeds Craig and Rita Liberti,‘“Cause that’s What Girls Do,”’ Gender & Society 21, no. 5 (2007): 697, www.jstor.org/ stable/27641005.

Lauren Alfrey and France Winddance Twine, “Gender-Fluid Geek Girls,” Gender & Society 31, no. 1

(2016): 28-50, https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0891243216680590; Wendy Faulkner, “Doing Gender in Engineering Workplace Cultures. I. Observations from the Field,” Engineering Studies 1, no. 1 (2009): 3—18, https://doi.org/10.1080/19378620902721322; Wendy Faulkner,“Doing Gender in Engineering Workplace Cultures. IL Gender In/authenticity and the In/visibility Paradox,” Engineering Studies 1, no. 3 (2009): 169-189, https://doi.org/10.1080/19378620903225059.

Alfrey and Twine, “Gender-Fluid Geek Girls,” 42—43.

Andrew Pilny and Jeffrey Proulx, “The Influence of Prototypical Communication in Dark Online Organizations: How to Speak Like a Monger,"Journal of Language and Social Psychology 37, no. 2 (2017): 249-261, https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0261927X17722581. ‘

Debra Benita Shaw, Technoculture: The key concepts (New York: Berg, 2008), 4.

Bryan Pfaff enberger, ‘“If I Want It, It’s OK’: Usenet and the (Outer) Limits of Free Speech,” The Information Society 12, no. 4 (1996): 365—386, https://doi.org/10.1080/019722496129350; Massanan, “#Gamergate and the Fappening,” 8.

Alice Marwick, “Gender, Sexuality, and Social Media,” in The Social Media Handbook, eds Jeremy Hunsinger, and Theresa M. Senft (New York: Routledge, 2013), 66; Marwick, Alice E. and Robyn Caplan, “Drinking Male Tears: Language, the Manosphere, and Networked Harassment,” Feminist Media Studies 18, no. 4,2018: 543-559. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1450568.

Liesbet van Zoonen,“Feminist Internet Studies,” Feminist Media Studies 1, no. 1 (2001): 67—72, https:// doi.org/10.1080/14680770120042864.

Salter, “Ghostbusters Is for Boys” 13.

Sean M. Eddington, “Organizing and Identification within r/TheRedPill: The Communicative Constitution of Organizational Identity Online.” (Unpublished PhD diss., Purdue University, 2019).

Brandee Easter, “‘Femimst_Brevity_in_Light_of_Masculine_Long-Windedness:’ Code, Space, and Online Misogyny,” Feminist Media Studies 18, no. 4 (2018): 677, https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1447335. Caitlin Macleod and Victoria Mcarthur, “The Construction of Gender in Dating Apps: An Interface Analysis of Tinder and Bumble,” Feminist Media Studies 2018,1—19, https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777. 2018.1494618.

van Zoonen, “Feminist Internet Studies,” 68.

Laura Lambert, The Internet:A Historical Encyclopedia (Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO, 2005), 210.

van Zoonen, “Feminist Internet Studies,” 68.

Mantilla, Gendertrolling, 170; Phillips, This Is Why, 158.

Debbie Ging, “Alphas, Betas, and Incels: Theorizing the Masculinities of the Manosphere,” Men and Masculinities 2017, https://do1.0rg/lO.l 177%2F1097184X17706401.

Mantilla describes Gamergate in the following way: “a campaign of harassment against women in the video game industry that received widespread media attention in August 2014” (46). Similarly, Massanari noted that “The Happening” was an online event wherein a large cache of private photographs from female celebrities were posted online on sites like 4chan and Reddit (1-2). The Manosophere is a loose network of blogs, forums, and online communities wherein men’s rights activists and right-wing extremists converge online (Ging 2017); Sean M. Eddington, “The Communicative Constitution of Hate Organizations Online: A Semantic Network Analysis of‘Make America Great Again,”’ Social Media Society 4, no. 3 (2018): 1—12, https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2056305118790763; Sean M. Eddington, “Alt-resilience: A Semantic Network Analysis of Identity (Re)construction in an Online Men’s Rights Community,” Journal of Applied Communication Research 48, no. 1 (2020): 114—135, https://doi.org/10. 1080/00909882.2019.1706099.

Emma A. Jane, “Systemic Misogyny Exposed: Translating Rapeghsh from the Manosphere with a Random Rape Threat Generator,” International Journal of Cultural Studies 21, no. 6 (2018): 661—681, https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1367877917734042.

Christine Lagorio-Chafkin, We Are the Nerds.The Birth and Tumultuous Life of Reddit, the Internets Culture Laboratory (New York: Hachette Books, 2018).

Phillips, This Is Why, 76.

Eddington, “Organizing and Identity,” 120; Massanari,“#Gamergate and the Fappening,” 7.

Linda L. Putnam and Marshall Scott Poole, “Conflict and Negotiation” in Handbook of Organizational Communication: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, eds Fredric M. Jablin, Linda L. Putnam, Karlene Roberts, and Lyman Porter (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1987), 552.

Linda L. Putnam and Deborah Kolb, “Rethinking Negotiation: Feminist Views of Communication and Exchange,” in Rethinking Organizational and Managerial Conflict from Feminist Perspectives, ed. Patrice M. Buzzanell (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2000), 76—104.

Deborah Cai and Edward Fink, “Conflict Style Differences between Individualists and Collectivists,” Communication Monographs 69, no. 1 (2002): 69, https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750216536.

Patrice M. Buzzanell and Meina Liu,“It’s a ‘Give and Take’: Maternity Leave as a Conflict Management Process,” Human Relations 60, no. 3 (2007): 563—595, https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0018726707076688; Min Jiang and Patrice M. Buzzanell, “Qualitative Approaches to Conflict” in The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Communication, eds John G. Oetzel, and Stella Ting-Toomey (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2013), 67-98.

Acker, “Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies,” 147; Buzzanell, “Gaining a Voice,” 344.

Cai and Fink, “Conflict Style Differences,” 82—83; Elisabeth Naima Mikkelsen and Stewart Clegg, “Unpacking the Meaning of Conflict in Organizational Conflict Research,” Negotiation and Conflict Management Research 11, no. 3 (2018): 185—203, https://doi.org/10.! 111/ncmr. 12127; James A. Wall Jr. and Ronda Roberts Callister, “Conflict and Its Management: Discover It’,” Journal of Management 21, no. 3 (1995): 515—558, https://psycnet.apa.0rg/doi/lO.l 177/014920639502100306.

Cai and Fink, “Conflict Style Differences,” 70—71; Marjaana Gunkel, Christopher Schlaegel, and Vas Taras,“Cultural Values, Emotional Intelligence, and Conflict Handling Styles: A Global Study,"Journal of World Business 51, no. 4 (2016): 568—585, https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.jwb.2016.02.001.

Meina Liu, “Cultural Differences in Goal-directed Interaction Patterns in Negotiation,” Negotiation and Conflict Management Research 4, no. 3 (2011): 178—199, https://doi.org/10.! 111/j.l750-4716.2011,00079.x; Meina Liu and Steven R. Wilson,’’The Effects of Interaction Goals on Negotiation Tactics and Outcomes: A Dyad-Level Analysis Across Two Cultures,” Communication Research 38, no. 2 (2010): 248-277, https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0093650210362680.

Buzzanell and Liu, “It’s a ‘Give and Take,”’467.

Clare O’Connor, “Bilhon-Dollar Bumble: How Whitney Wolfe Herd Built America’s Fastest-Growing Dating App,” Forbes, November 17, 2017, para 7, accessed May 08, 2019, www.forbes.com/sites/ clareoconnor/2017/11 /14/billion-dollar-bumble-how-whitney-wolfe-herd-built-americas-fastest-growmg-dating-app/.

O’Connor, para. “Bilhon-Dollar Bumble,” 8.

Whitney Wolfe Herd, “You Reported Sexual Harassment, Now What? Bumble’s Whitney Wolfe Herd Offers Advice,” Medium, September 26, 2018, para 2—3, accessed May 08, 2019, https://medium.com/ harpers-bazaar/you-reported-sexual-harassment-now-what-bumbles-whitney-wolfe-herd-offers-advice-653036a400a8.

Ahiza Garcia, “Bumble Founder Created the App after Experiencing Online Harassment,” CNNMoney, accessed May 08, 2019, https://money.cnn.com/2017/09/14/technology/business/bumble-whitney-wolfe-fresh-money/index.html.

Garcia, para “Bumble Founder,” 6.

Stephen P. Robbins, ‘“Conflict Management’ and 'Conflict Resolution’Are Not Synonymous Terms.” California Management Review 21, no. 2 (1978): 67—75, https://doi.org/10.2307%2F41164809.

Robbins,‘“Conflict Management,”’ 69.

Putnam and Kolb, “Rethinking Negotiation,” 84.

Barbara J. Risman, Where the Millennials Will Take Us (New York: Oxford University Press, 2018).

“Bumble Mission, Vision and Values,” Comparably, accessed May 08, 2019, www.comparably.com/ companies/bumble/mission.

“Bumble Mission,Vision, & Values,” para 2.

“About,” Bumble, accessed May 08, 2019, https://bumble.com/en-us/about.

Lisa Rich wine, “Serena Williams to Take Bumble’s Woman-first Message to Super Bowl,” Reuters, January 03, 2019, accessed May 08, 2019, www.reuters.com/article/us-people-serenawilliams/ serena-williams-to-take-bumbles-woman-first-message-to-super-bowl-idUSKCNlOX0V4.

“Privacy,” Bumble, accessed May 08, 2019, https://bumble.com/privacy/.

Shauna Dillavou, “Women-run Bumble to Silicon Valley: User Safety Is the New Cool,” Women’s Media Center, accessed May 08, 2019, www.womensmediacenter.com/news-features/ women-run-bumble-to-silicon-valley-user-safety-is-the-new-cool.

"Terms.” Bumble. Accessed January 28, 2019. https://bumble.com/en-us/terms.

Candice Jahli, “Bumble Bans Awful Fat-Shaming Male User from the App, So Now We Can Celebrate,” Elite Daily, May 08, 2019, para 10, accessed May 08, 2019, www.elitedaily.com/dating/ fat-shaming-bumble/1755334.

Sara Ashley O'Brien, “Dating App Bumble Slams—and Bans—Misogynist User,” CNNMoney, accessed May 08, 2019, https://money, cnn.com/2016/06/10/technology/bumble-app-imwithashley/index, html.

“An Open Letter to Connor,” Bumble, accessed May 08, 2019, http://thebeehive.bumble.com/ bumbleblog/an-open-letter-to-connor.

Dillavou, “Women-run Bumble,” para 7.

Emma A. Jane, “Online Misogyny and Feminist Digilantism,” Continuum 30, no. 3 (2016): 284—297, https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2016.1166560.

Tindernightmares,“Unspirational on Instagram:‘Makes Sense,”' Instagram, accessed May 08,2019, www. instagram. com/p/Bm8_rZ0BxR8/.

Hess and Flores, “Simply More than Swiping Left,” 1099.

Taina Bucher, “Want to Be on the Top? Algorithmic Power and the Threat of Invisibility on Facebook,” New Media & Society 14, no. 7 (2012): 1164-1180, https://doi.org/10.! 177%2F 1461444812440159. Hess and Flores, “Simply More than Swiping Left,” 1099; Jane,“Online Misogyny,” 287—288.

Nicole Ellison, Rebecca Hemo, and Jennifer Gibbs, “Managing Impressions Online: Self-Presentation Processes in the Online Dating Environment,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11, no. 2 (2006): 415—441, https://doi.org/10.! 111/j.1083-6101.2006.00020.x; Jennifer L. Gibbs, Nicole B. Ellison, and Chih-Hui Lai, “First Comes Love,Then Comes Google: An Investigation of Uncertainty Reduction Strategies and Self-Disclosure in Online Dating,” Communication Research 38, no. 1 (2010): 70-100, https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0093650210377091.

Buzzanell, “Gaining a Voice,” 367.

Suzy D’Enbeau, “Unpacking the Dimensions of Organizational Tension: The Case of Sexual Violence Response and Prevention Among College Students,"Journal of Applied Communication Research 45, no. 3

(2017): 237-255, https://d01.0rg/l0.1080/00909882.2017.1320568.

D’Enbeau,“Unpacking the Dimensions,” 251.

Karen Lee Ashcraft, Timothy R. Kuhn, and François Cooren, “1 Constitutional Amendments: “Materializing” Organizational Communication,” The Academy of Management Annals 3, no. 1 (2009): 1—64, www.researchgate.net/pubhcation/247527086_l_Constitutional_Amendments_Materiahzing_ Organizational_Communication.

Kate Lockwood Harris, “Re-situating Organizational Knowledge: Violence, Intersectionality and the Privilege of Partial Perspective,” Human Relations 70, no. 3 (2017): 263—85, https://doi.org/10.1177 %2F0018726716654745.

 
Source
< Prev   CONTENTS   Source   Next >