Vulture Restaurants and the Loss of a Pulsed Resource

Supplementary feeding stations or vulture restaurants have been considered for decades to be a key management tool for the conservation of scavenger bird populations (Bijleveld 1974; Houston 1987; Piper 2006). Species managed by supplementary feeding include: the California Condor ( Gymnogyps californianus) in Western North America; the King Vulture ( Sacorramphus papa) in Belize; and the Cape Vulture ( Gyps coprotheres) and bearded vulture in Southern Africa (Wilbur and Jackson 1983; Houston 1987; Brown 1990; Mundy et al. 1992). In Eurasia, vulture restaurants have mainly targeted populations of bearded,

Egyptian, griffon, and cinereous vultures (Donázar 1993; Donázar et al. 2009a, 2010; Cortés-Avizanda et al. 2010; Fig. 5.4). Supplementary feeding stations have also been considered as key tools in the recovery of the critically endangered Asian vulture populations after the catastrophic declines caused by the veterinary treatment of livestock with diclofenac (i.e., NSAID, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, see Gilbert et al. 2007; Prakash et al. 2012 and references therein). In general, it is assumed that this management tool provides a number of benefits for the conservation of the target species: an increase of food availability, reduction of the risk of poisoning and persecution, and an increase in the availability of micronutrients (calcium) (Piper 2006).

Supplementary feeding stations, however, change the spatio-temporal distribution of a food resource that is otherwise unpredictable and ephemeral. As we have described above, in natural systems, carcasses resemble other trophic pulsed resources such as tree-masting or insect explosions (Ostfeld and Keesing 2000; Rose and Polis 1998). Currently, however, carcasses have become predictable and clumped via this human intervention and the consequences of this deep alteration of habitat quality have been largely ignored, under the assumption that only positive effects would occur. We are now increasingly aware that these positive effects exist but that there are also other negative effects that may override the positive conservation effects on the target species. For instance, it has been demonstrated that proximity to vulture restaurants promotes communal roosts and long-term territory maintenance in the Egyptian vulture increasing the probability of frequent visits by breeding adults from nearby territories (Grande et al. 2009; Benítez et al. 2009; García-Heras et al. 2013; Lopez-Lopez 2014). In the case of the Pyrenean bearded vultures, supplementary feeding stations have led to high rates of immature survival thus dampening the effects of indirect persecution (poisoning) and increasing population viability (Oro et al. 2008). Conversely, negative population effects are also apparent. Negative density-dependent decreases of productivity and appearance of unusual breeding units (polyandrous trios) have been detected in the vicinity of bearded vulture feeding places (Carrete et al. 2006a, b). Unwanted effects have also been detected in the structure and functioning of guilds. Vulture restaurants favour the gathering of individuals of the dominant species (e.g., the griffons), which monopolize food to the detriment of small and less competitive and often more endangered scavenger species (Cortés-Avizanda et al. 2010; 2012). The predictable nature (in space and time) of carrion disposed in these places disrupts ecological processes provoking a reduction of guild diversity and the loss of intraguild facilitatory processes because dominant specialist species (griffons) arrive early and in larger numbers (Cortés-Avizanda et al. 2012). Less competitive species may congregate at feeding places but they may be unsuccessful at feeding, whereby the feeding place would become an ecological trap (Cortés-Avizanda et al. 2012 and authors' unpublished data; Fig. 5.5).

Finally, the aggregation of food resources at scavenger feeding places may have consequences on non-scavenging species, permeating to other ecological levels. Facultative species consume carcasses less efficiently and more slowly than the specialists or strict carrion-eaters and most importantly, they do not feed only on carcasses but also rely on small prey. Therefore, predation pressure can increase on passerine species breeding in the vicinities of vulture restaurants and carcass

Fig . 5.5  Randomly distributed vs. predictable resources. Unpredictable trophic resources allow the occurrence of facilitatory processes promoting the biodiversity and the coexistence of species within an Old World avian scavenger guild: E.g. a A Bearded vulture ( Gypaetus barbatus) sharing a carcass with a common raven ( Corvus corax) and b A griffon vulture ( Gyps fulvus) sharing a carcass with two Egyptian vultures ( Neophron percnopterus). c Group of griffon vultures at supplementary feeding stations.Large amount of carrion clumped at these predictable sites favours the aggregations of hundreds of individuals (Photo Credit: Jordi Bas a and Antonio Atienza  b and c)

accumulations can change the spatial distribution of herbivore mammals (CortésAvizanda et al. 2009a, b; Wilmers et al. 2003). This phenomenon may be pronounced at high latitudes, where cold temperatures during long winters slow the activity of microorganisms and invertebrates and where there is a lack of specialist carrion-eaters that would otherwise quickly deplete the carrion (Selva and CortésAvizanda 2009; Cortés-Avizanda 2011; Cortés-Avizanda et al. 2009a).

< Prev   CONTENTS   Next >