Advantages, Disadvantages and Limitations

Table of Contents:

These co-culture systems give the opportunity to study cell–cell communication, and most cell laboratories will have the possibility to establish at least some of these co-cultivation systems. The use of monocyte-derived DCs or PBMCs have the advantage of responding well with the production of cytokines, whilst THP-1 on the other side produce a limited number of cytokines. These protocols are timeconsuming and therefore not suitable for high throughput screening. As for other in vitro culturing systems the data should be interpreted with care as they do not represent the complexity found in the in vivo situation.


The co-cultivation systems described here needs to be carefully validated in order to be able to harvest reliable experimental data related to communication between immune cells and epithelial cells. They can be used for screening purposes, however, due to time consumption they are generally unsuitable for high throughput screening. Co-culture of Caco-2 and Raji cells generates cells with a M-cell like phenotype. Such cells can give useful information regarding transport of test compounds through M-cells, however such studies will eventually have to be confirmed in an in vivo system.


Antunes F, Andrade F, Araujo F et al (2013) Establishment of a triple co-culture in vitro cell models to study intestinal absorption of peptide drugs. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 83:427–435

Araujo F, Sarmento B (2013) Towards the characterization of an in vitro triple co-culture intestine cell model for permeability studies. Int J Pharm 458:128–134

Artis D (2008) Epithelial-cell recognition of commensal bacteria and maintenance of immune homeostasis in the gut. Nat Rev Immunol 8:411–420

Calatayud M, Vazquez M, Devesa V et al (2012) In vitro study of intestinal transport of inorganic and methylated arsenic species by Caco-2/HT29-MTX cocultures. Chem Res Toxicol 25: 2654–2662

Coombes JL, Powrie F (2008) Dendritic cells in intestinal immune regulation. Nat Rev Immunol 8:435–446

de Kivit S, van Hoffen E, Korthagen N et al (2011) Apical TLR ligation of intestinal epithelial cells drives a Th1-polarized regulatory or inflammatory type effector response in vitro. Immunobiology 216:518–527

Decker T, Lohmann-Matthes ML (1988) A quick and simple method for the quantitation of lactate dehydrogenase release in measurements of cellular cytotoxicity and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) activity. J Immunol Methods 115:61–69

Finn R, Ahmad T, Coffey ET et al (2014) Translocation of Vibrio parahaemolyticus across an in vitro M cell model. FEMS Microbiol Lett 350:65–71

Gullberg E, Leonard M, Karlsson J et al (2000) Expression of specific markers and particle transport in a new human intestinal M-cell model. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 279:808–813

Ishimoto Y, Satsu H, Totsuka M et al (2011) IEX-1 suppresses apoptotic damage in human intestinal epithelial Caco-2 cells induced by co-culturing with macrophage-like THP-1 cells. Biosci Rep 31:345–351

Kerneis S, Bogdanova A, Kraehenbuhl JP et al (1997) Conversion by Peyer's patch lymphocytes of human enterocytes into M cells that transport bacteria. Science 277:949–952

Kerneis S, Caliot E, Stubbe H et al (2000) Molecular studies of the intestinal mucosal barrier physiopathology using cocultures of epithelial and immune cells: a technical update. Microbes Infect 2:1119–1124

Leonard F, Collnot EM, Lehr CM (2010) A three-dimensional coculture of enterocytes, monocytes and dendritic cells to model inflamed intestinal mucosa in vitro. Mol Pharm 7:2103–2119

Lo D, Tynan W, Dickerson J et al (2004) Cell culture modeling of specialized tissue: identification of genes expressed specifically by follicle-associated epithelium of Peyer's patch by expression profiling of Caco-2/Raji co-cultures. Int Immunol 16:91–99

Miller JC, Brown BD, Shay T et al (2012) Deciphering the transcriptional network of the dendritic cell lineage. Nat Immunol 13:888–899

Mora JR, Bono MR, Manjunath N et al (2003) Selective imprinting of gut-homing T cells by Peyer's patch dendritic cells. Nature 424:88–93

Mowat AM (2003) Anatomical basis of tolerance and immunity to intestinal antigens. Nat Rev Immunol 3:331–341

Parlesak A, Haller D, Brinz S et al (2004) Modulation of cytokine release by differentiated CACO-2 cells in a compartmentalized coculture model with mononuclear leucocytes and nonpathogenic bacteria. Scand J Immunol 60:477–485

Pastorelli L, De Salvo C, Mercado JR et al (2013) Central role of the gut epithelial barrier in the pathogenesis of chronic intestinal inflammation: lessons learned from animal models and human genetics. Front Immunol 4:280

Rimoldi M, Chieppa M, Vulcano M et al (2004) Intestinal epithelial cells control dendritic cell function. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1029:66–74

Roberts CL, Keita AV, Parsons BN et al (2013) Soluble plantain fibre blocks adhesion and M-cell translocation of intestinal pathogens. J Nutr Biochem 24:97–103

Schimpel C, Teubl B, Absenger M et al (2014) Development of an advanced intestinal in vitro triple culture permeability model to study transport of nanoparticles. Mol Pharm 11(3): 808–818

Schmohl M, Schneiderhan-Marra N, Baur N et al (2012) Characterization of immunologically active drugs in a novel organotypic co-culture model of the human gut and whole blood. Int Immunopharmacol 14:722–728

Segura E, Touzot M, Bohineust A et al (2013) Human inflammatory dendritic cells induce Th17 cell differentiation. Immunity 38:336–348

Stagg AJ, Kamm MA, Knight SC (2002) Intestinal dendritic cells increase T cell expression of alpha4beta7 integrin. Eur J Immunol 32:1445–1454

Steinman RM (2007) Dendritic cells: understanding immunogenicity. Eur J Immunol 37(Suppl 1): S53–S60

Steinman RM (2012) Decisions about dendritic cells: past, present, and future. Annu Rev Immunol 30:1–22

Steinman RM, Idoyaga J (2010) Features of the dendritic cell lineage. Immunol Rev 234:5–17

< Prev   CONTENTS   Next >