Menu
Home
Log in / Register
 
Home arrow Law arrow Partnerships in International Policy-Making: Civil Society and Public Institutions in European and Global Affairs
Source

Conclusions

A number of lessons can be learnt from this analysis: (1) the significance of civil society’s role into the political system should not be underestimated; (2) the (international) system is changing towards forms of interdependence and transnational interactions that are ever more intense and difficult to tame and control; and (3) significant opportunities and risks are intermingled within the relations between public institutions and civil society.

Note

1. In 2009, there were 1316 EU-level interest representatives on the EC register, with approximately 60% stemming from business and trade associations and the rest representing diffuse or public interests.

References

Belloni, R. (2001). Civil society and peacebuilding in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Journal of Peace Research, 38(2), 163-180.

Boronska-Hryniewiecka, K. (2011). Europeanization of non-state actors: Towards a framework for analysis. In D. Armstrong, V. Bello, J. Gilson, & D. Spini (Eds.), Civil society and international governance. The role ofnon-state actors in global and regional regulatory frameworks (pp. 73-91). London: Routledge.

Chandler, D. (2001). The road to military humanitarianism: How the human rights NGOs shaped a new humanitarian agenda. Human Rights Quarterly, 23(3), 678-700.

Christensen, D., & Weinstein, J. M. (2013). Defunding dissent: Restrictions on aid to NGOs. Journal of Democracy, 24(2), 77-91.

Council of the European Union. (2012). EU strategic framework and action plan on human rights and democracy. Luxembourg (11855/12): Retrieved from http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/EN/ foraff/131181.pdf

Curtin, D. (2003). Private interest representation or civil society deliberation: A contemporary dilemma for European governance. Social and Legal Studies, 12(1), 55-75.

Della Porta, D., & Caiani, M. (2009). Social movements and Europeization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Doyle, M. W. (1983). Kant, liberal legacies, and foreign affairs (parts I and II). Philosophy and Public Affairs, 12(3-4), 205-235 (I); 323-253 (II).

Dupuy, K. E., Ron, J., & Prakash, A. (2015). Who survived? Ethiopia’s regulatory crackdown on foreign-funded NGOs. Review of International Political Economy, 22(2), 419-456.

Dupuy, K. E., Ron, J., & Prakash, A. (2016). Hands Off My Regime! Governments’ restrictions on foreign aid to nongovernmental organizations in poor and middle- income countries. World Development. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.02.001.

Economic and Social Committee. (1999). Opinion of the Economic and Social Committee onThe role and contribution of Civil Society Organizations in the building of Europe’. Brussels.

European Commission. (2001). European governance: A white paper. Brussels.

European Commission. (2006). Non-Paper expanding on the proposals contained in the communication to the European Parliament and the Council on "Strengthening the ENT”’’: Strengthening the civil society dimension of the ENP. Brussels.

European Commission. (2007). European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR). Strategy Paper 2007-2010. Brussels.

European Commission. (2010). European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR). Strategy Paper 2011-2013. Brussels.

Heidbreder, E. G. (2012). Civil society participation in EU governance. Living Reviews in European Governance, 7(2). doi:10.12942/lreg-2007-2.

Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2009). A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus ot constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 1-23.

Joerges, C., & Neyer, J. (2006). Deliberative supranationalism. Florence: EUI Working Paper LAW-20.

Kaya, A., & Marchetti, R. (2014). Europeanization, framing competition and civil society in the EU and Turkey.

Marchetti, R., & Tocci, N. (2011). Redefining EU engagement with conflict society. In R. Marchetti & N. Tocci (Eds.), Civil society, ethnic conflicts, and the politicization ofhuman rights (pp. 181-203). Tokyo: United Nations University Press.

Marchetti, R., & Tocci, N. (2013). The European Union approach to peacebuilding via civil society. In J. Boulden & W. Kymlicka (Eds.), International approaches to governing ethnic diversity (pp. 169-197). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Quittkat, C., & Finke, B. (2008). The EU commission consultation Regime. In

B. Kohler-Koch, D. De Bievre, & W. Maloney (Eds.), Opening EU-Governance to civil society: Gains and challenges (pp. 183-222). Mannheim: Connex Report Series #5, University of Mnnheim.

Radaelli, C. (2003). The Europeanization of public policies. In K. Featherstone &

C. Radaelli (Eds.), The politics of Europeanization (pp. 27-56). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Richmond, O. (2006). Patterns of peace. Global Society, 20(4), 367-394. Richmond, O., & Carey, H. (2005). Subcontracting peace: The challenges of NGO peacebuilding. Aldershot: Ashgate.

Vukosavljevic, N. (2007). Training for peacebuilding and conflict transformation.

Experiences of the Centre for Nonviolent Action. Berlin.

 
Source
Found a mistake? Please highlight the word and press Shift + Enter  
< Prev   CONTENTS   Next >
 
Subjects
Accounting
Business & Finance
Communication
Computer Science
Economics
Education
Engineering
Environment
Geography
Health
History
Language & Literature
Law
Management
Marketing
Mathematics
Political science
Philosophy
Psychology
Religion
Sociology
Travel