Historical and Theoretical Background

The remainder of this chapter will outline the development of HEIs in the EU to explain their character and current influences upon them (Sects. 1.3.1—1.3.3). To examine HEIs in the EU requires an understanding of the nature of European HEIs more widely. The idea of HEIs has been a manifold concept since the establishment of the first European universities in the narrower sense about 850 years ago which changed over time with emphasis being set on different aspects of their activities according to the general historical development of that time. Thus the ‘mission’ of the European university is best explained from a historical perspective. Further, the remainder of this chapter will position the book within the approaches of European integration theory to illuminate the theoretical background (Sect. 1.3.4).[1]

The Original Non-economic Purpose of European HEIs

The first HEIs[2] in Europe developed in the Middle Ages[3] and have since undergone two significant periods of change.[4] Originally European HEIs were bodies widely autonomous from the church and state.[5] This, despite the Bible being regarded as the ultimate truth, allowed HEIs to question current doctrine (the scholastic method) which is considered to be the beginning of the concept of academic freedom.[6] Whilst the medieval universities’ main focus was to teach students recognising ‘divine truth’, professors also conducted experiments and knowledge transfer activities such as serving as advisors or judges.[7] As HEIs developed under pre-nation-state conditions and Latin served as the lingua franca, they were international institutions engaged in lively mutual exchange.[8]

The first period of change occurred in early modernity.[9] Corresponding to the rise of nation states in Europe, the previously international HEIs with free moving academics became national institutions. At the same time, societal developments such as the exploration of (to Europeans) hitherto unknown parts of the world, discoveries in the natural sciences by Copernicus, Galileo and, later, Newton and the rise of humanist philosophy nourished HEIs.[10] In the 19th century, the Prussian Minister of Education Wilhelm von Humboldt triggered the second period of change by establishing a new concept which integrated a stronger research focus into the nationalised HEIs.[11] Accordingly, research was conducted for the sake of acquiring new knowledge with no applications in mind,[12] was chiefly mono-disciplinary with increasing specialisation and was supposed to inform teaching. Furthermore, the ideas of allowing students to choose their courses freely and to guarantee professors freedom of choice regarding the directions of research and teaching, strengthened the academic freedom.[13]

By the end of the 19th century European universities had thus developed into research intensive institutions which, despite being nationalised, retained a high degree of academic freedom and autonomy. They served the public purpose in the national interest by teaching and conducting research for knowledge’s sake rather than towards a particular, commercially exploitable aim and were funded mainly by the state.[14]

  • [1] A shortened version of Sect. 1.3 is contained in Gideon 2015a.
  • [2] The terms HEI and university are used interchangeably here as in most literature on the subject(see Allen 1988, p. 14). This phenomenon, might be based on the fact that for many centuries theuniversity was the most important HEI in the meaning of the term today. Where differentiation isessential this has been made clear.
  • [3] See Farrington and Palfreyman 2012, p. 11 who trace the earliest forerunner HEI in Europeback to the Pandidakterion in what is now Istanbul in 425 CE. The first universities in the narrowersense in Europe then developed in the High Middle Ages starting with the University of Bolognain 1158. See also Koch 2008, p. 20 seq; Cowan et al. 2009, p. 278; Wissema 2009, pp. 3, 9.
  • [4] The features of universities in different periods are elaborated upon here in an ideal-typicalmanner in the Weberian sense by describing the archetype extracted from common appearances(Weber 2005, p. 4 seq). Such an analysis thus explicitly does not entail that every situation isexactly in accordance with the archetype, instead it is more a trend becoming apparent.
  • [5] See Scott 2006, p. 7; Neave 2009, p. 19; Stichweh 2009, p. 2; Wissema 2009, p. 6 seq, 10.
  • [6] See Allen 1988, p. 16; Scott 2006, p. 2 seq, 8 seq; Wissema 2009, p. 5.
  • [7] See Allen 1988, p. 16; Scott 2006, p. 6 seq; Clark 2006, p. 4 seq; Wissema 2009, p. 4 seq, 9seq; Neave 2009, p. 24.
  • [8] See Scott 2006, p. 7 seq; Wissema 2009, p. 10; Stichweh 2009, p. 2.
  • [9] Early 16th until late 18th century. See Erbe 2007, p. 11.
  • [10] See Allen 1988, pp. 16, 21; Clark 2006, p. 6 seq; Scott 2006, p. 10 seq; Koch 2008, p. 74 seq;Wissema 2009, p. 9 seq, 14; Cowan et al. 2009, p. 279.
  • [11] See Denninger 2001, p. 10; Clark 2006, p. 3 seq; Scott 2006, p. 19 seq; Wissema 2009,p. 13 seq; Cowan et al. 2009, p. 279; Neave 2009, p. 24. Further on Humboldt’s writings aboutthe university see Koch 2008, p. 143 seq.
  • [12] Applied research as well as some research in the very expensive ‘big science’ thus developedmainly outside HEIs. See further Scott 2006, p. 21 seq.
  • [13] See Rohrs 1995, p. 124; Denninger 2001, p. 10 seq; Connell 2004, p. 19; Clark 2006, p. 3 seq;Scott 2006, p. 20 seq; Wissema 2009, p. 13 seq; De Weert 2009, pp. 135, 140; Neave 2009, p. 31.
  • [14] In the following, the term HEIs when used in the European context refers to these (usuallypublic) institutions which combine research and tertiary education, since, despite the fact thatthere are now also other forms of HEIs, these classical European HEIs, for which the term‘university’ could almost be used interchangeably, are the focus of this research.
< Prev   CONTENTS   Source   Next >