References

  • 1. Smail, D. J. (2005). Power, interest and psychology: Elements of a social materialist understanding of distress. London: PCCS Books.
  • 2. Waldegrave, C. (2005). “Just therapy” with families on low incomes. Child Welfare, 84(2), 265-276.
  • 3. Sieberg, C. B., Williams, S., & Simons, L. E. (2011). Do parent protective responses mediate the relation between parent distress and child functional disability among children with chronic pain? Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 36(9), 1043-1051.
  • 4. Emerson, E. (2003). Mothers of children and adolescents with intellectual disability: Social and economic situation, mental health status, and the self- assessed social and psychological impact of the child’s difficulties. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 47(4-5), 385-399.
  • 5. Emerson, E., Shahtahmasebi, S., Lancaster, G., & Berridge, D. (2010). Poverty transitions among families supporting a child with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 35(4), 224-234.
  • 6. Reid, D. K., & Valle, J. W. (2004). The discursive practice of learning disability implications for instruction and parent—School relations. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(6), 466-481.
  • 7. Walker, C., & Streatfield, J. (2012). The Amaze disability living allowance project: An evaluation. Brighton: University of Brighton.
  • 8. Cromby, J., Diamond, B., Kelly, P, Moloney, P, Priest, P, Smail, D., et al. (2012). Draft manifesto for a social materialist psychology of distress. Journal of Critical Psychology, Counselling and Psychotherapy, 12(2), 93-107.
  • 9. Tew, J. (2011). Social approaches to mental distress. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • 10. Banks, P, & Lawrence, M. (2005). Transparent or opaque? Disabled people in Scotland describe their experience of applying for disability living allowance. Journal of Social Work, 5(3), 299-317.
  • 11. Tam, S.-F., & Cheng, A. W (2005). Self-concepts of parents with a child of school age with a severe intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 9(3), 253-268.
  • 12. Manning, N. (2010). Therapeutic communities: A problem or a solution for psychiatry? A sociological view. British Journal of Psychotherapy, 26(4), 434-443.
  • 13. Duff, C. (2012). Exploring the role of ‘enabling places’ in promoting recovery from mental illness: A qualitative test of a relational model. Health & Place, 18(6), 1388-1395.
  • 14. Grant, A. (2015). Demedicalising misery: Welcoming the human paradigm in mental health nurse education. Nurse Education Today, 35(9), e50-e53.
  • 15. Mol, A., Moser, I., & Pols, J. (2010). Care: Putting practice into theory. In A. Mol, I. Moser, & J. Pols (Eds.), Care in practice: On tinkering in clinics, homes and farms (pp. 7-26). Bielefeld: Verlag.
  • 16. Singleton, V. (2010). Good farming: Control or care? In A. Mol, I. Moser, & J. Pols (Eds.), Care in practice: Tinkering in clinics, homes and farms (pp. 235-256). Bielefeld: Verlag.
  • 17. Law, J. (2010). Care and killing. In A. Mol, I. Moser, & J. Pols (Eds.), Care in practice: On tinkering in clinics, homes and farms. Bielefeld: Verlag.
  • 18. Pols, J. (2010). Telecare: What patients care about. In A. Mol, I. Moser, & J. Pols (Eds.), Care in practice: On tinkering in clinics, homes and farms. Bielefeld: Verlag.
  • 19. Atkinson, S. (2013). Beyond components of wellbeing: The effects of relational and situated assemblage. Topoi, 32(2), 137-144.
  • 20. Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham: Duke University Press.
 
Source
< Prev   CONTENTS   Source   Next >