References

Alexa, M., & Zuell, C. (2000). Text analysis software: Commonalities, differences and limitations: The results of a review. Quality and Quantity, 34(3), 299-321.

Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385-405.

Bogner, A., & Menz, W. (2009). The theory-generating expert interview: Epistemological interest, forms of knowledge, interaction. In A. Bogner, B. Littig, & W. Menz (Eds.), Interviewing experts (pp. 43-80). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77—101.

Burian, R. M. (2001). The dilemma of case studies resolved: The virtues of using case studies in the history and philosophy of science. Perspectives on Science, 5(4), 383-404.

Calvert, J., & Fujimura, J. H. (2011). Calculating life? Duelling discourses in interdisciplinary systems biology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 42(2), 155-163.

Caneva, K. L. (2011). What in truth divides historians and philosophers of science? In S. Mauskopf & T. Schmaltz (Eds.), Integrating history and philosophy of science: Problems and prospects (pp. 49-57). Dordrecht: Springer.

Chang, H. (2004). Inventing temperature: Measurement and scientific progress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Chang, H. (2011). Beyond case-studies: History as philosophy. In S. Mauskopf & T. Schmaltz (Eds.), Integrating history and philosophy of science: Problems and prospects (pp. 109-124). Dordrecht: Springer.

Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 509-536). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Crabtree, B. F., & Miller, W. L. (1992). Primary care research: A multimethod typology and qualitative road map. In B. F. Crabtree & W. L. Miller (Eds.), Doing qualitative research: Multiple strategies (pp. 3-28). Thousand Oaks:

Sage.

Czarniawska, B. (2007). Shadowing and other techniques for doing fieldwork in modern societies. Malm0, K0benhavn, Oslo: Liber/CBS/Universitetsforlaget.

Denzin, N. K. (1994). The art and politics ofinterpretation. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook ofqualitative research (1st ed., pp. 500-515). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (1994). Handbook of qualitative research (1st ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Ellis, C., & Berger, L. (2003). Their story/my story/our story: Including the researcher’s experience in interview research. In J. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Inside interviewing: New lenses, new concerns (pp. 467-494). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Fagan, M. B. (2011). Is there collective scientific knowledge? Arguments from explanation. The Philosophical Quarterly, 61(243), 247—269.

Fine, M., Weis, L., Weseen, S., & Wong, L. (2000). For whom? Qualitative research, representations, and social responsibilities. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 107—132). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Flyvbjerg, B. (2007). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium, & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 390—404). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H. (2000). The interview: From structured questions to negotiated text. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 645—672). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

George, A., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Gerring, J. (2007). Case study research: Principles and practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Giere, R. N. (2011). History and philosophy of science: Thirty-five years later. In S. Mauskopf & T. Schmaltz (Eds.), Integrating history andphilosophy of science: Problems and prospects (pp. 59—65). Dordrecht: Springer.

Gomm, R. (2004). Social research methodology: A critical introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Hasu, M., & Miettinen, R. (2006). Dialogue and intervention in science and technology studies: Whose point of view? (Working Papers 35). Center for Activity Theory and Developmental Work Research, University of Helsinki. Retrieved from http://www.edu.helsinki.fi/activity/publications/ files/333/Hasu_and_Miettinen_2006.pdf

Kastenhofer, K. (2013). Two sides of the same coin? The (techno)epistemic cultures of systems and synthetic biology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 44(2), 130—140.

King, N., & Horrocks, C. (2010). Interviews in qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Leonelli, S. (2007). Weed for thought: Using Arabidopsis thaliana to understand plant biology (Doctoral dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1871/10703 (Last accessed on September 18, 2013.)

Leonelli, S. (2010). Documenting the emergence of bio-ontologies: Or, why researching bioinformatics requires HPSSB. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 32(1), 105—126.

Mansnerus, E., & Wagenknecht, S. (2015). Feeling with the organism: A blueprint for an empirical philosophy of science. In S. Wagenknecht, N. J. Nersession, & H. Andersen (Eds.), Empirical philosophy of science: Introducing qualitative methods into philosophy of science (pp. 37—61). Dordrecht: Springer.

Nersessian, N. J. (1991). The method to “meaning”: A reply to Leplin. Philosophy of Science, 58(4), 678—686.

Nersessian, N. J. (1995). Should physicists preach what they practice? Constructive modeling in doing and learning physics. Science & Education, 4(3), 203-226.

Nersessian, N. J. (2006). The cognitive-cultural systems of the research laboratory. Organization Studies, 27(1), 125-145.

Nersessian, N. J., Kurz-Milcke, E., Newstetter, W. C., & Davies, J. (2003). Research laboratories as evolving distributed cognitive systems. In R. Alter- mann & D. Kirsh (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-fifth annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 857-862). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Osbeck, L. M., & Nersessian, N. J. (2010). Forms of positioning in interdisciplinary science practice and their epistemic effects. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 40(2), 136-161.

Osbeck, L. M., & Nersessian, N. J. (2015). Prolegomena to an empirical philosophy of science. In S. Wagenknecht, N. J. Nersession, & H. Andersen (Eds.), Empirical philosophy of science. Introducing qualitative methods into philosophy ofscience (pp. 13-35). Dordrecht: Springer.

Osbeck, L. M., Nersessian, N. J., Malone, K. R., & Newstetter, W. C. (2011). Science as psychology: Sense-making and identity in science practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pitt, J. C. (2001). The dilemma of case studies: Toward a Heraclitian philosophy of science. Perspectives on Science, 5(4), 373-382.

Platt, J. (2007). Case study. In W. Outhwaite & S. P. Turner (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social science methodology (pp. 100-118). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Poulsen, M.-B. J. (2001). Competition and cooperation: what rules in scientific dynamics? Journal of Technology Management, 22(7/8), 782-793.

Riesch, H. (2010). Simple or simplistic? Scientists’ views on Occam’s Razor. Theoria, 67, 75-90.

Schickore, J. (2009). Studying justificatory practice: An attempt to integrate the history and philosophy of science. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 23(1), 82-107.

Schostak, J. (2006). Interviewing and representation in qualitative research. Berkshire: Open University Press.

Stake, R. E. (2000). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 435—454). Thousand Oaks:

Sage.

Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Thagard, P. (1988). Computational philosophy of science. Cambridge: MIT Press. Toon, A. (2012). Models as make-believe. Imagination, fiction and scientific representation. Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Wimsatt, W. C. (2007). Re-engineering philosophy for limited beings: Piecewise approximations to reality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Zuckerman, H. (1972). Interviewing an ultra-elite. Public Opinion Quarterly, 32(2), 159-175.

 
Source
< Prev   CONTENTS   Source   Next >