Menu
Home
Log in / Register
 
Home arrow Psychology arrow The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Social Psychology
Source

Key References

Arber, A. (2008). Team meetings in specialist palliative care: Asking questions as a strategy within interprofessional interaction. Qualitative Health Research, 18, 1323-1335. doi:10.1177/1049732308322588

Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs: General & Applied, 70, 1-70.

Gibson, S. (2013a). Milgram’s obedience experiments: A rhetorical analysis. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52, 290-309.

Hepburn, A., & Potter, J. (2011). Threats: Power, family mealtimes and social influence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 99-120.

Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York: Harper & Row.

References

Allport, F. H. (1924). Social psychology. New York: Houghton Mifflin.

Arber, A. (2008). Team meetings in specialist palliative care: Asking questions as a strategy within interprofessional interaction. Qualitative Health Research, 18, 1323-1335. doi:10.1177/1049732308322588.

Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 70, 1-70.

Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J. (1984). Transcript notation. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. ix—xvi). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Baumrind, D. (1964). Some thoughts on ethics of research: After reading Milgram’s “behavioural study of obedience”. American Psychologist, 19, 421—423.

Baumrind, D. (2013). Is Milgram’s deceptive research ethically acceptable? Theoretical and Applied Ethics, 2, 1—18. doi:10.1353/tha.2013.0012.

Beauvois, J.-L., Courbet, D., & Oberle, D. (2012). The prescriptive power of the television host. A transposition of Milgram’s obedience paradigm to the context of a TV game show. European Review of Applied Psychology, 62, 111—119. doi:10.1016/j.erap.2012.02.001.

Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Billig, M., Condor, S., Edwards, D., Gane, M., Middleton, D. J., & Radley, A. R. (1988). Ideological dilemmas: A social psychology of everyday thinking. London: Sage.

Blass, T. (2004). The man who shocked the world: The life and legacy of Stanley Milgram. New York: Basic Books.

Brehm, S. S., & Kassin, S. M. (1996). Social psychology (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

Brown, P, & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Burger, J. M. (2009). Replicating Milgram: Would people still obey today? American Psychologist, 64, 1—11. doi:10.1037/a0010931.

Burger, J. M., Girgis, Z. M., & Manning, C. M. (2011). In their own words: Explaining obedience to authority through an examination of participants’ comments. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 460—466.

doi:10.1177/1948550610397632.

Cialdini, R. B. (2009). Influence: Science and practice (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591—621. doi:10.1146/annurev. psych.55.090902.142015.

Cialdini, R. B., Vincent, J. E., Lewis, S. K., Catalan, T., Wheeler, D., & Darby, B. L. (1975). Reciprocal concessions procedure for inducing compliance: The door-in- the-face technique. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 31, 206—215.

Cromby, J., & Willis, M. (2011). England’s dreaming? UK critical psychology, 2011. Annual Review of Critical Psychology, 10, http://www.discourseunit.com/arcp10/ United%20Kingdom%20932-951.pdf

Dambrun, M., & Vatine, E. (2010). Reopening the study of extreme social behaviors: Obedience to authority within an immersive video environment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 760—773.

Danziger, K. (1992). The project of an experimental social psychology: Historical perspectives. Science in Context, 5, 309—328.

Dolinski, D. (2000). On inferring one’s beliefs from one’s attempt and consequences for subsequent compliance. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 78, 260—272. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.260.

Edwards, D. (1999). Emotion discourse. Culture & Psychology, 5, 271—291. doi:10.1 177/1354067X9953001.

Edwards, D. (2005). Discursive psychology. In K. L. Fitch & R. E. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of language & social interaction (pp. 257—273). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Faye, C. (2012). American social psychology: Examining the contours of the 1970s crisis. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 43, 514-521.

Festinger, L., Pepitone, A., & Newcomb, T. (1952). Some consequences of deindividuation in a group. Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology, 47, 382-389. doi:10.1037/h0057906.

Figgou, L. (2013). Essentialism, historical construction, and social influence: Representations of Pomakness in majority talk in Western Thrace (Greece). British Journal of Social Psychology, 52, 686-702. doi:10.1111/bjso.12002.

Fiske, S. T., Harris, L. T., & Cuddy, A. J. C. (2004). Why ordinary people torture enemy prisoners. Science, 306, 1482-1483. doi:10.1126/science.1103788.

Freedman, J. L., & Fraser, S. C. (1966). Compliance without pressure: The foot-in- the-door technique. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 4, 195-202. doi:10.1037/h0023552.

Gergen, K. J. (1973). Social psychology as history. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 26, 309-320. doi:10.1037/h0034436.

Gergen, K. J. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 40, 266-275. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.40.3.266.

Gibson, S. (2013a). Milgram’s obedience experiments: A rhetorical analysis. British JournalofSocial Psychology, 52, 290-309. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02070.x.

Gibson, S. (2013b). ‘The last possible resort’: A forgotten prod and the in situ standardization of Stanley Milgram’s voice-feedback condition. History of Psychology, 16, 177-194. doi:10.1037/a0032430.

Gibson, S. (2014). Discourse, defiance and rationality: ‘Knowledge work’ in the ‘obedience’ experiments. Journal ofSocial Issues, 70, 424-438. doi:10.1111/josi.12069.

Gibson, S. (2015). Rhetoric and resistance. The Psychologist, 28, 648-651.

Gibson, S. (2016). Re-visiting Milgram: Developing psychology’s archival sensibilities. Qualitative Psychology. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1037/qup0000040

Gough, B., McFadden, M., & McDonald, M. (2013). Critical social psychology: An introduction (2nd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays in face-to-face behavior. Chicago: Aldine.

Harre, R., & Secord, P. F. (1972). The explanation of social behaviour. Oxford: Blackwell.

Haslam, S. A., & Reicher, S. (2007). Beyond the banality of evil: Three dynamics of an interactionist social psychology of tyranny. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 615-622. doi:10.1177/0l46l67206298570.

Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., & Birney, M. E. (2014). Nothing by mere authority: Evidence that in an experimental analogue of the Milgram paradigm participants are motivated not by orders but by appeals to science. Journal of Social Issues, 70, 473-488. doi:10.1111/josi.12072.

Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., Millard, K., & McDonald, R. (2015). ‘Happy to have been of service’: The Yale archive as a window into the engaged followership of participants in Milgram’s ‘obedience’ experiments. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54, 55-83. doi:10.1111/bjso.12074.

Hayter, D., & Hegarty, P. (2015). A genealogy of postmodern subjects: Discourse analysis and late capitalism. Theory & Psychology, 25, 369-387. doi:10.1177/0959354314553966.

Henriques, J., Hollway, W., Unwin, C., Venn, C., & Walkerdine, V. (1984). Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity. London: Methuen.

Hepburn, A., & Potter, J. (2011). Threats: Power, family mealtimes, and social influence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 99-120. doi:10.1348/0144666 10X500791.

Hodges, B. H., & Geyer, A. L. (2006). A nonconformist account of the Asch experiments: Values, pragmatics, and moral dilemmas. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 10, 2-19. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1001_1.

Hogg, M. A., & Vaughan, G. M. (2011). Social psychology (6th ed.). Harlow: Pearson.

Hollander, M. M. (2015). The repertoire of resistance: Non-compliance with directives in Milgram’s ‘obedience’ experiments. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54, 425-444. doi:10.1111/bjso.12099.

Horton-Salway, M. (2007). The ‘ME bandwagon’ and other labels: Constructing the genuine case in talk about a controversial illness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 895-914. doi:10.1348/014466607X173456.

Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (2008). Conversation analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity.

Israel, J., & Tajfel, H. (1972). The context of social psychology: A critical assessment. London: Academic Press.

King, S. B. (2011). Military social influence in the global information environment: A civilian primer. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 11, 1-26. doi:10.1111/j.1530-2415.2010.01214.x.

Lankford, A. (2009). Promoting aggression and violence at Abu Ghraib: The U.S. military’s transformation of ordinary people into torturers. Aggression & Violent Behavior, 14, 388-395. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2009.06.007.

Le Bon, G. (1895, trans. 1947). The crowd: A study of the popular mind. London: Ernest Benn.

Millard, K. (2014). Revisioning obedience: Exploring the role of Milgram’s skills as a filmmaker in bringing his shocking narrative to life. Journal of Social Issues, 70, 439-455. doi:10.111/josi.12070.

Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioural study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology, 67, 371-378.

Milgram, S. (1965). Some conditions of obedience and disobedience to authority. Human Relations, 18, 57-76. doi:10.1177/001872676501800105.

Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York: Harper & Row.

Miller, A. G. (1986). The obedience experiments: A case study of controversy in social science. New York: Praeger.

Miller, A. G. (2004). What can the Milgram experiments tell us about the Holocaust? Generalizing from the social psychology laboratory. In A. G. Miller (Ed.), The social psychology of good and evil (pp. 193-239). New York: Guilford Press.

Mixon, D. (1989). Obedience and civilization. London: Pluto.

Moscovici, S. (1976). Social influence and social change. London: Academic Press.

Moscovici, S., & Lage, E. (1976). Studies in social influence: III. Majority versus minority influence in a group. European Journal of Social Psychology, 6, 149-174. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420060202.

Moscovici, S., Lage, E., & Naffrechoux, M. (1969). Influence of a consistent minority on the responses of a majority in a color perception task. Sociometry, 32, 365-380. doi:10.2307/2786541.

Moscovici, S., & Markova, I. (2006). The making of modern social psychology: The hidden story of how an international social science was created. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Nicholson, I. (2011). “Torture at Yale”: Experimental subjects, laboratory torment and the “rehabilitation” of Milgram’s “Obedience to Authority”. Theory and Psychology, 21, 737-761. doi:10.1177/0959354311420199.

Orne, M. T., & Holland, C. C. (1968). Some conditions of obedience and disobedience to authority. On the ecological validity of laboratory deceptions. International Journal of Psychiatry, 6, 282-293.

Perry, G. (2012). Behind the shock machine: The untold story of the notorious Milgram psychology experiments. Brunswick, Australia: Scribe.

Pina e Cunha, M., Rego, A., & Clegg, S. R. (2010). Obedience and evil: From Milgram and Kampuchea to normal organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 291-309. doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0510-5.

Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (1998). Deindividuation and antinormative behaviour: A metaanalysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 238-259. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.123.3.238.

Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage.

Reddy, M. J. (1979). The conduit metaphor—A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 284-324). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Reicher, S. D. (1984). The St. Pauls’ riot: An explanation of the limits of crowd action in terms of a social identity model. European Journal of Social Psychology, 14, 1-21. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420l40102.

Reicher, S. D., & Haslam, S. A. (2006). Rethinking the psychology of tyranny: The BBC prison study. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 1-40. doi:10.1348/014 466605X48998.

Reicher, S., & Stott, C. (2011). Mad mobs & Englishmen? Myths and realities of the 2011 riots. London: Constable & Robinson.

Ring, K. (1967). Experimental social psychology: Some sober questions about some frivolous values. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 113-123. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(67)90016-9.

Rose, N. (1999). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self (2nd ed.). London: Free Association.

Russell, N. J. C. (2011). Milgram’s obedience to authority experiments: Origins and early evolution. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 140-162. doi:10.1348/01 4466610X492205.

Russell, N. (2014). The emergence of Milgram’s bureaucratic machine. Journal of Social Issues, 70, 409-423. doi:10.1111/josi.12068.

Samelson, F. (1986). Authoritarianism from Berlin to Berkeley: On social psychology and history. Journal of Social Issues, 42, 191-208. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1986. tb00216.x.

Sheppard, J. P, & Young, M. (2007). The routes of moral development and the impact of exposure to the Milgram obedience study. Journal of Business Ethics, 75, 315-333. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9255-6.

Sherif, M. (1966). The psychology of social norms (Torchbook ed.). New York: Harper and Row (Original work published 1936).

Shotter, J. (1993). Conversational realities: Constructing life through language. London: Sage.

Slater, M., Antley, A., Davison, A., Swapp, D., Guger, C., Barker, C., et al. (2006). A virtual reprise of the Stanley Milgram obedience experiments. PLOS One, 1, e39. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000039.

Slutkin, G. (2011, August 14). Rioting is a disease spread from person to person— the key is to stop the infection. The Observer. Retrieved from http://www.the- guardian.com/uk/2011/aug/14/rioting-disease-spread-from-person-to-person

Smart, C. A. (2014). Understanding social influence differently: A discursive study of livery yards. Doctoral thesis, The Open University, UK.

Strauss, C. (2004). Cultural standing in expression of opinion. Language in Society, 33, 161-194. doi:10.1017/S004740450433201X.

Tajfel, H. (Ed.). (1978). Differentiation between groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.

Tajfel, H. (1972). Experiments in a vacuum. In J. Israel & H. Tajfel (Eds.), The context of social psychology: A critical assessment (pp. 69-119). London: Academic Press.

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33—47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

Wetherell, M. (2007). A step too far: Discursive psychology, linguistic ethnography and questions of identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11, 661—681.

doi:10.1111/j.l467-984l.2007.00345.x.

Wooffitt, R. (2005). Conversation analysis and discourse analysis: A comparative and critical introduction. London: Sage.

Zeigler-Hill, V., Southard, A. C., Archer, L. M., & Donohoe, P. L. (2013). Neuroticism and negative affect influence the reluctance to engage in destructive obedience in the Milgram paradigm. Journal of Social Psychology, 153, 161—174. doi:10.1080/00224545.2012.713041.

Zimbardo, P. G. (1969). The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 17, 237-307.

 
Source
Found a mistake? Please highlight the word and press Shift + Enter  
< Prev   CONTENTS   Next >
 
Subjects
Accounting
Business & Finance
Communication
Computer Science
Economics
Education
Engineering
Environment
Geography
Health
History
Language & Literature
Law
Management
Marketing
Mathematics
Political science
Philosophy
Psychology
Religion
Sociology
Travel