This chapter has provided an introduction to using the framing image of the plant as a site for therapeutic work. This image is particularly useful as it offers both a concrete representation of an individual’s dominant personality traits and also a means of capturing the dynamic processes of human development. Although I have identified some common themes and patterns in the plant forms, in the end, each imagery representation is unique to the individual. Once clients have a clear picture of their plant form, this image can operate as a means of facilitating and tracking their growth and development over time. Furthermore, this image provides a particularly helpful and positive means for clients to deepen their self-understanding - representing oneself as a plant highlights the natural cyclical processes of life and engenders hope. In addition, it can offer a corrective to the pathologising tendencies evident in contemporary Western culture’s attachment to models of linear progress. I will be returning to more discussion of the plant image in the next chapter when I examine how it can be integrated with the other two framing images into a powerful multi-aspected vehicle for ongoing therapeutic work.


Assagioli, R. (1965). Psychosynthesis, New York: Hobbs, Dorman & Co.

Hall, E., Hall, C., Stradling, P. and Young, D. (2006). Guided Imagery: Creative interventions in counselling and psychotherapy, London: Sage.

Jolles, I. (1971). A Catalog for the Qualitative Interpretation of the House-Tree-Person: H-T-P, Los Angeles: Western Psychology Services.

Kovecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A practical introduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors We Live By, 2nd edn, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Leuner, H. (1984). Guided Affective Imagery in Short-term Psychotherapy: The basic course, New York: Thieme-Stratton Corp.

< Prev   CONTENTS   Source   Next >