Menu
Home
Log in / Register
 
Home arrow Language & Literature arrow COGNITIVE APPROACH TO NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING
Source

Bibliography

[AGR 93] Agrawal R., Imielinski T., Swami A., “Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases”, ACM SIGMOD, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 207-216, 1993.

[ARG 05] Argamon S., Levitan S., “Measuring the usefulness of function words for authorship attribution”, Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the Association for Computers and the Humanities and the Association for Literary and Linguistic Computing, pp. 3-7, 2005.

[BAA 02] Baayen H., Van Halteren H., Neijt A. et al., “An experiment in

authorship attribution”, Proceedings of 6th International Conference on the Statistical Analysis of Textual Data, pp. 29-37, 2002.

[BUR 02] Burrows J., “‘Delta’: a measure of stylistic difference and a guide to likely authorship”, Literary and Linguistic Computing, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 267287, 2002.

[CHU 07] Chung C., Pennebaker J., “The psychological functions of function words”, Social Communication, pp. 343-359, 2007.

[DER 04] De Roeck A., Sarkar A., Garthwaite P., “Defeating the homogeneity assumption”, Proceedings of 7th International Conference on the Statistical Analysis of Textual Data, pp. 282-294, 2004.

[DIE 03] Diederich J., Kindermann J., Leopold E. et al., “Authorship attribution with support vector machines”, Applied Intelligence, vol. 19, pp. 109-123, 2003.

[EDE 13] Eder M., “Does size matter? Authorship attribution, small samples, big problem”, Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 2013.

[FOU 11] Fournier-Viger P., Tseng V., “Mining top-k sequential rules”, Advanced Data Mining and Applications, Springer, pp. 180-194, 2011.

[GAM 04] Gamon M., “Linguistic correlates of style: authorship classification with deep linguistic analysis features”, Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 611-617, 2004.

[HOL 01] Holmes D., Robertson M., Paez R., “Stephen Crane and the New-York Tribune: a case study in traditional and non-traditional authorship attribution”,

Computers and the Humanities, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 315-331, 2001.

[HOO 03] Hoover D., “Frequent collocations and authorial style”, Literary and Linguistic Computing, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 261-286, 2003.

[HOU 06] Houvardas J., Stamatatos E., “N-gram feature selection for authorship identification”, Artificial Intelligence: Methodology, Systems, and Applications, springer, pp. 77-86, 2006.

[KES 03] Keselj V., Peng F., Cercone N. et al., “N-gram-based author profiles for authorship attribution”, Proceedings of the Conference Pacific Association for Computational Linguistics, PACLING, vol. 3, pp. 255-264, 2003.

[KHM 01] Khmelev D., Tweedie F., “Using Markov chains for identification of writer”, Literary and Linguistic Computing, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 299-307, 2001.

[KOP 04] Koppel M., Schler J., “Authorship verification as a one-class classification problem”, Proceedings of the Twenty-First International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 62-67, 2004.

[KOP 09] Koppel M., Schler J., Argamon S., “Computational methods in authorship attribution”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 9-26, 2009.

[KUK 01] Kukushkina O., Polikarpov A., Khmelev D., “Using literal and grammatical statistics for authorship attribution”, Problems of Information Transmission, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 172-184, 2001.

[O’NE 01] O’Neill M., Ryan C., “Grammatical evolution”, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 349-358, 2001.

[QUI 12] Quiniou S., Cellier P., Charnois T. et al, “What about sequential data mining techniques to identify linguistic patterns for stylistics?”, Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing, springer, pp. 166-177, 2012.

[RAM 04] Ramyaa C.H., Rasheed K., “Using machine learning techniques for stylometry”, Proceedings of International Conference on Machine Learning,

2004.

[RUD 97] Rudman J., “The state of authorship attribution studies: some problems and solutions”, Computers and the Humanities, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 351-365, 1997.

[SEB 02] Sebastiani F., “Machine learning in automated text categorization”, ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 1-47, 2002.

[STA 01] Stamatatos E., Fakotakis N., Kokkinakis G., “Computer-based authorship attribution without lexical measures”, Computers and the Humanities, vol. 35, pp. 193-214, 2001.

[STA 09] Stamatatos E., “A survey of modern authorship attribution methods”,

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 538-556, 2009.

[YUL 44] YULE G., The Statistical Study of Literary Vocabulary, CUP Archive, 1944.

[ZHA 05] Zhao Y., Zobel J., “Effective and scalable authorship attribution using function words”, Information Retrieval Technology, Springer, pp. 174-189,

2005.

This page intentionally left blank

 
Source
Found a mistake? Please highlight the word and press Shift + Enter  
< Prev   CONTENTS   Next >
 
Subjects
Accounting
Business & Finance
Communication
Computer Science
Economics
Education
Engineering
Environment
Geography
Health
History
Language & Literature
Law
Management
Marketing
Mathematics
Political science
Philosophy
Psychology
Religion
Sociology
Travel