Appendix 3: List of rulings of the European Court on the interpretation of the Lugano/Brussels rules
The chronological list of cases are the decisions of the European Court, on references made for a preliminary ruling, on the Brussels Convention/Regulation and the Lugano Convention. All were decided before Completion Day, which means that they are retained EU case law for the purposes of Section 6 of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018.
The numbers of the Articles given in the right-hand column are those of the 2007 Lugano Convention, which is for almost all purposes identical to the Brussels I Regulation 44/2001. Where rulings were given on the Brussels Convention or the recast Regulation 1215/2015, the Article numbers have been converted so that they appear here labelled with the corresponding Article number of the Lugano Convention.
|
Seq: |
Case: |
Parties: |
Report: |
Neutral ref |
Lugano Article no: |
|
1 |
12/76 |
Tessili v Dunlop |
[1976] ECR 1473 |
EU:C:1976:133 |
5(1) |
|
2 |
14/76 |
De Bloos v Bouyer |
[1976] ECR 1497 |
EU:C: 1976:134 |
5(1), 5(5) |
|
3 |
29/76 |
LTU v Eurocontrol |
[1976] ECR 1541 |
EU:C: 1976:137 |
1 |
|
4 |
21/76 |
Bier v Mines de Potasse |
[1976] ECR 1735 |
EU:C:1976:166 |
5(3) |
|
5 |
42/76 |
De Wolf v Cox |
[1976] ECR 1759 |
EU:C:1976:168 |
38 |
|
6 |
24/76 |
Salotti v RÜWA |
[1976] ECR 1831 |
EU:C:1976:177 |
23 |
|
7 |
25/76 |
Segoura v Bonakdarian |
[1976] ECR 1851 |
EU:C:1976:178 |
23 |
|
8 |
9/77 |
Bavaria Flug v Eurocontrol |
[1977] ECR 1517 |
EU:C: 1977:132 |
70 |
|
9 |
43/77 |
Industrial Diamond v Riva |
[1977] ECR 2175 |
EU:C:1977:188 |
31,37 |
|
10 |
73/77 |
Saunders v Van der Putte |
[1977] ECR 2382 |
EU:C:1977:208 |
22(1) |
|
11 |
150/77 |
Bertrand v Ott |
[1978] ECR 1431 |
EU:C:1978:137 |
15 |
|
12 |
23/78 |
Meeth v Glacetal |
[1978] ECR 2183 |
EU:C:1978:198 |
23 |
|
13 |
33/78 |
Somafer v Saar-Ferngas |
[1978] ECR 2133 |
EU:C:1978:205 |
5(5) |
|
14 |
133/78 |
Gourdain v Nadler |
[1979] ECR 733 |
EU:C:1979:49 |
l(2)(b) |
|
15 |
143/78 |
De Cavel r De Cavel (1) |
[1979] ECR 1055 |
EU:C: 1979:83 |
1, 31 |
|
16 |
25/79 |
Sanicentral v Collin |
[1979] ECR 3423 |
EU:C: 1979:255 |
23 |
|
17 |
56/79 |
Zeiger v Salinitri (I) |
[1980] ECR 89 |
EU:C:1980:15 |
5(1) |
|
18 |
120/79 |
De Cavel v De Cavel (II) |
[1980] ECR 731 |
EU:C: 1980:70 |
31 |
|
19 |
784/79 |
Porta-Leasing v Prestige |
[1980] ECR 1517 |
EU:C: 1980:123 |
23 |
|
20 |
125/79 |
Denilauler v Couchet Freies |
[1980] ECR 1553 |
EU:C:1980:130 |
32, 34(2) |
|
21 |
814/79 |
Netherlands v Riiffer |
[1980] ECR 3807 |
EU:C:1980:291 |
1 |
|
22 |
139/80 |
Blanckaert & Willems |
[1981] ECR 819 |
EU:C:1981:70 |
5(5) |
|
23 |
157/80 |
Re Rinkau |
[1981] ECR 1391 |
EU:C:1981:120 |
61 |
|
24 |
166/80 |
Klomps v Michel |
[1981] ECR 1593 |
EU:C:1981:137 |
34(2) |
|
25 |
150/80 |
Elefanten Schuh v Jacqmain |
[1981] ECR 1671 |
EU:C:1981:148 |
23, 24, 28 |
|
26 |
27/81 |
Rohr v Ossberger |
[1981] ECR 2431 |
EU:C:1981:243 |
24 |
|
27 |
38/81 |
Effer v Kantner |
[1982] ECR 825 |
EU:C:1982:79 |
5(1) |
|
28 |
25/81 |
CHWv CJH |
[1982] ECR 1189 |
EU:C:1982:116 |
1,24,31 |
|
29 |
133/81 |
I vend v Schwab |
[1982] ECR 1891 |
EU:C:1982:199 |
5(1) |
|
30 |
228/81 |
Pendy Plastic v Pluspunkt |
[1982] ECR 2723 |
EU:C: 1982:276 |
26, 34(2) |
|
31 |
34/82 |
Martin Peters v ZNA V |
[1983] ECR 987 |
EU:C: 1983:87 |
57(1) |
|
32 |
201/82 |
Gerling v Italian Treasury |
[1983] ECR 2503 |
EU:C:1983:217 |
23, 24 |
|
33 |
80/83 |
Habourdin v Italocrema |
[1983] ECR 3639 |
EU:C: 1983:321 |
[inadmissible] |
|
34 |
288/82 |
Duijnstee v Goderbauer |
[1983] ECR 3663 |
EU:C: 1983:326 |
22(4), 25 |
|
35 |
56/84 |
Von Gallera v Maître |
[1984] ECR 1769 |
EU:C: 1984:136 |
[inadmissible] |
|
36 |
129/83 |
Zeiger v Salinitri (11) |
[1984] ECR 2397 |
EU:C:1984:2I5 |
27 |
|
37 |
71/83 |
The Tilly Russ |
[1984] ECR 2417 |
EU:C:1984:217 |
23 |
|
38 |
178/83 |
PvK |
[1984] ECR 3033 |
EU:C: 1984:272 |
43 |
|
39 |
258/83 |
Brennero v Wendel |
[1984] ECR 3971 |
EU:C: 1984:363 |
43, 46 |
|
40 |
241/83 |
Rösler v Rottwinkel |
[1985] ECR 99 |
EU:C:1985:6 |
22(1) |
|
41 |
48/84 |
Spitzley v Sommer |
[1985] ECR 787 |
EU:C:1985:105 |
23,24 |
|
42 |
49/84 |
Debaecker v Bouwman |
[1985] ECR 1779 |
EU:C:I985:252 |
34 |
|
43 |
148/84 |
G’bank v B du Pêcheur |
[1985] ECR 1981 |
EU:C: 1985:280 |
43 |
|
44 |
220/84 |
AS-Autoteile v Malhé |
[1985] ECR 2267 |
EU:C: 1985:302 |
22(5) |
|
45 |
221/84 |
Berghofer v ASA |
[1985] ECR 2699 |
EU:C:1985:337 |
23 |
|
46 |
119/84 |
Capelloni v Pelkmans |
[1985] ECR 3147 |
EU:C: 1985:388 |
47 |
|
47 |
22/85 |
Anterist v Credit Lyonnais |
[1986] ECR 1951 |
EU:C: 1986:255 |
23 |
|
48 |
198/85 |
Carron v Germany |
[1986] ECR 2437 |
EU:C: 1986:313 |
40 |
|
49 |
313/85 |
Iveco Fiat v Van Hool |
[1986] ECR 3337 |
EU:C: 1986:423 |
23 |
|
50 |
266/85 |
Shenavai v Kreischer |
[1987] ECR 239 |
EU:C:1987:11 |
5(1) |
|
51 |
144/86 |
Gubisch v Palumbo |
[1987] ECR 4861 |
EU:C: 1987:528 |
27 |
|
52 |
218/86 |
Schotte v Rothschild |
[1987] ECR 4905 |
EU:C: 1987:536 |
5(5) |
|
53 |
145/86 |
Hoffmann v Krieg |
[1988] ECR 645 |
EU:C:1988:61 |
1,33, 34, 38,43 |
|
54 |
9/87 |
Arcado v Haviland |
[1988] ECR 1539 |
EU:C:1988:127 |
5(1) |
|
55 |
158/87 |
Scherrens v Maenhout |
[1988] ECR 3791 |
EU:C: 1988:370 |
22(1) |
|
56 |
189/87 |
Kalfelis v Schröder |
[1988] ECR 5565 |
EU:C: 1988:459 |
5(3), 6(1) |
|
57 |
32/88 |
Six v Humbert |
[1989] ECR 341 |
EU:C: 1989:68 |
5(1) |
(from this point, case references are properly C-(noZyear), and ECR references are [year] ECR I-(page))
|
58 |
115/88 |
Reichert v Dresdner (I) |
[1990] ECR 27 |
EU:C: 1990:3 |
22(1) |
|
59 |
220/88 |
Dumez France v HELABA |
[1990] ECR 49 |
EU:C: 1990:8 |
5(3) |
|
60 |
365/88 |
Hagen v Zeehaghe |
[1990] ECR 1845 |
EU:C: 1990:203 |
6(2) |
|
61 |
305/88 |
Lancray v Peters & Sickert |
[1990] ECR 2725 |
EU:C: 1990:275 |
34(2) |
|
62 |
351/89 |
Overseas Union v NHI |
[1991] ECR 3317 |
EU:C:1991:279 |
4, 27 |
|
63 |
190/89 |
Marc Rich v Impianti |
[1991] ECR 3855 |
EU:C:1991:319 |
l(2)(d) |
|
64 |
183/90 |
Van Dalfsen v Van Loon |
[1991] ECR 4743 |
EU:C:1991:379 |
43,46 |
|
65 |
280/90 |
Hacker v Euro-Relais |
[1992] ECR 1111 |
EU:C: 1992:92 |
22(1) |
|
66 |
214/89 |
Powell Duffryn v Petereit |
[1992] ECR 1745 |
EU:C:1992:115 |
23 |
|
67 |
261/90 |
Reichert v Dresdner (II) |
[1992] ECR 2149 |
EU:C:1992:149 |
5(3), 22(5), 31 |
|
68 |
26/91 |
Jakob Handte v TMCS |
[1992] ECR 3697 |
EU:C: 1992:268 |
5(1) |
|
69 |
123/91 |
Minalmet v Brandeis |
[1992] ECR 5661 |
EU:C: 1992:432 |
34(2) |
|
70 |
89/91 |
Shearson Lehmann v TVB |
[1993] ECR 139 |
EU:C:1993:15 |
15 |
|
71 |
172/91 |
Sonntag v Waidmann |
[1993] ECR 1963 |
EU:C:1993:144 |
1,5(4), 34(2), 44 |
|
72 |
125/92 |
Midox IBC v Geels |
[1993] ECR 4075 |
EU:C: 1993:306 |
5(1) |
|
73 |
129/92 |
Owens Bank Ltd v Bracco |
[1994] ECR 117 |
EU:C:1994:13 |
1 |
|
74 |
294/92 |
Webb v Webb |
[1994] ECR 1717 |
EU:C: 1994:193 |
22(1) |
|
75 |
414/92 |
Solo Kleinmotoren v Boch |
[1994] ECR 2237 |
EU:C:1994:221 |
34(3), 58 |
|
76 |
292/93 |
Lieber v Gobel |
[1994] ECR 2535 |
EU:C: 1994:241 |
22(1) |
|
Seq: |
Case: |
Parties: |
Report: |
Neutral ref |
Lugano Article no: |
|
77 |
288/92 |
Custom Made v Stawa |
[1994] ECR 2913 |
EU:C: 1994:268 |
5(1), 23 |
|
78 |
318/93 |
Brenner & Noller |
[1994] ECR 4275 |
EU:C:1994:331 |
15, 16 |
|
79 |
406/92 |
The Tatry |
[1994] ECR 5439 |
EU:C: 1994:400 |
27, 28,71 |
|
80 |
68/93 |
Shevill v Presse Alliance SA |
[1995] ECR 415 |
EU:C:1995:61 |
5(3) |
|
81 |
346/93 |
Kleinwort Benson v G'gow |
[1995] ECR 615 |
EU:C:1995:85 |
[inadmissible] |
|
82 |
439/93 |
Lloyd's Register v Bernard |
[1995] ECR 961 |
EU:C:1995:104 |
5(5) |
|
83 |
341/93 |
Danvaern v Otterbeck |
[1995] ECR 2053 |
EU:C:1995:239 |
6(3) |
|
84 |
474/93 |
Hengst Import v Campese |
[1995] ECR 2113 |
EU:C: 1995:243 |
34(2) |
|
85 |
432/93 |
SISRÜ v Ampersand |
[1995] ECR 2269 |
EU:C:1995:262 |
44, 46 |
|
86 |
364/93 |
Marinari v Lloyd’s Bank |
[1995] ECR 2719 |
EU:C:1995:289 |
5(3) |
|
87 |
275/94 |
Van der Linden r BFE |
[1996] ECR 1393 |
EU:C:1996:101 |
55 |
|
88 |
78/95 |
Hendrickman v Magenta |
[1996] ECR 4943 |
EU:C:1996:380 |
34(2) |
|
89 |
383/95 |
Rutten v Cross Medical Ltd |
[1997] ECR 57 |
EU:C:1997:7 |
5(1) |
|
90 |
106/95 |
MSG v Les Gravières |
[1997] ECR 911 |
EU:C:1997:70 |
5(1), 23 |
|
91 |
220/95 |
V d Boogaard v Laumen |
[1997] ECR 1147 |
EU:C:1997:91 |
1 |
|
92 |
295/95 |
Farrell v Long |
[1997] ECR 1683 |
EU:C: 1997:168 |
[maintenance] |
|
93 |
269/95 |
Benincasa v Dentalkit |
[1997] ECR 3767 |
EU:C: 1997:337 |
15,23 |
|
94 |
163/95 |
Van Horn v Cinnamond |
[1997] ECR 5451 |
EU:C: 1997:472 |
27, 63 |
|
95 |
351/96 |
Drouot v CMI |
[1998] ECR 3075 |
EU:C: 1998:242 |
27 |
|
96 |
51/97 |
Réunion Européenne |
[1998] ECR 6511 |
EU:C: 1998:509 |
5(1), 5(3), 6(1) |
|
97 |
391/95 |
Van Uden v Deco-Line |
[1998] ECR 7091 |
EU:C: 1998:543 |
1,31 |
|
98 |
159/97 |
Castelletti v Hugo Trumpy |
[1999] ECR 1597 |
EU:C:1999:142 |
23 |
|
99 |
99/96 |
Mietz v Intership Yachting |
[1999] ECR 2277 |
EU:C: 1999:202 |
15, 31 |
|
100 |
267/97 |
Coursier v Fortis Bank |
[1999] ECR 2843 |
EU:C:1999:213 |
38 |
|
101 |
260/97 |
Unibank v Christensen |
[1999] ECR 3715 |
EU:C:1999:312 |
42, 43, 57 |
|
102 |
440/97 |
Groupe Concorde |
[1999] ECR 6307 |
EU:C: 1999:456 |
5(1) |
|
103 |
420/97 |
Leathertex v Bodetex |
[1999] ECR 6747 |
EU:C: 1999:483 |
5(1) |
|
104 |
8/98 |
Dansommer v Götz |
[2000] ECR 393 |
EU:C:2000:45 |
22(1) |
|
105 |
7/98 |
Krombach v Bamberski |
[2000] ECR 1935 |
EU:C:2000:164 |
34(1) |
|
106 |
38/98 |
Renault v Maxicar |
[2000] ECR 2973 |
EU:C:2000:225 |
34(1) |
|
107 |
412/98 |
UGIC v Groupe Josi |
[2000] ECR 5925 |
EU:C:2000:399 |
1, 8-14 |
|
108 |
387/98 |
Coreck Maritime GmbH |
[2000] ECR 9337 |
EU:C:2000:606 |
23 |
|
109 |
518/99 |
Gaillard v Chekili |
[2001] ECR 2771 |
EU:C:2001:209 |
22(1) |
|
110 |
256/00 |
Be six SA v lE/l/MG |
[2002] ECR 1699 |
EU:C:2002:99 |
5(1) |
|
111 |
37/00 |
Weber v UOS |
[2002] ECR 2013 |
EU:C:2002:122 |
5(1), 19 |
|
112 |
24/02 |
Marseille Fret v Seatrano |
[2002] ECR 3383 |
EU:C:2002:220 |
[inadmissible] |
|
113 |
69/02 |
Reichling v Wampach |
[2002] ECR 3393 |
EU:C:2002:221 |
[inadmissible] |
|
114 |
80/00 |
Italian Leather v WECO |
[2002] ECR 4995 |
EU:C:2002:342 |
27, 31 |
|
115 |
96/00 |
Gabriel v Schlank & Schick |
[2002] ECR 6367 |
EU:C:2002:436 |
5(1), 5(3) |
|
116 |
334/00 |
Tacconi v HWS |
[2002] ECR 7357 |
EU:C:2002:499 |
5(1), 5(3) |
|
117 |
167/00 |
VfK >• Henkel |
[2002] ECR 8111 |
EU:C:2002:555 |
1, 15, 5(1), 5(3) |
|
118 |
271/00 |
Steenbergen v Baten |
[2002] ECR 10489 |
EU:C:2002:656 |
1 |
|
119 |
437/00 |
Pugliese v Finmeccaniche |
[2003] ECR 3573 |
EU:C:2003:219 |
5(1), 19 |
|
120 |
111/01 |
Gantner v Basch |
[2003] ECR 4207 |
EU:C:2003:257 |
27 |
|
121 |
266/01 |
TIA RD r Netherlands |
[2003] ECR 4867 |
EU:C:2003:282 |
1 |
|
122 |
116/02 |
Erich Gasser v MISAT |
[2003] ECR 14693 |
EU:C:2003:657 |
23,27 |
|
123 |
433/01 |
Bayern v Blijdenstein |
[2004] ECR 981 |
EU:C:2004:21 |
1 |
|
124 |
18/02 |
DFDS Torline v SEKO |
[2004] ECR 1417 |
EU:C:2004:74 |
5(3) |
|
125 |
265/02 |
Frahuil v Assitalia |
[2004] ECR 1543 |
EU:C:2004:77 |
1,5(1) |
|
126 |
159/02 |
Turner v Grovit |
[2004] ECR 3565 |
EU:C:2004:228 |
[general scheme] |
|
127 |
168/02 |
Kronhofer v Maier |
[2004] ECR 6009 |
EU:C:2004:364 |
5(3) |
|
128 |
555/03 |
Warbecq v Ryanair |
[2004] ECR 6041 |
EU:C:2004:370 |
[inadmissible] |
|
129 |
39/02 |
M |
[2004] ECR 9657 |
EU:C:2004:615 |
27, 34(2) |
|
130 |
148/03 |
Nürnberger v Portbridge |
[2004] ECR 10327 |
EU:C:2004:677 |
20, 67 |
|
131 |
464/01 |
Gruber v Bay Wa |
[2005] ECR 439 |
EU:C:2005:32 |
15 |
|
132 |
27/02 |
Engler v Janus |
[2005] ECR 481 |
EU:C:2005:33 |
5(1), 5(3), 15 |
|
133 |
281/02 |
Owusu v Jackson |
[2005] ECR 1383 |
EU:C:2005:120 |
[general scheme] |
|
134 |
104/03 |
St Paul Dairy v Unibel |
[2005] ECR 3481 |
EU:C:2005:255 |
31 |
|
135 |
112/03 |
Peloux v AXA |
[2005] ECR 3707 |
EU:C:2005:280 |
13 |
|
136 |
77/04 |
Reunion v Zurich |
[2005] ECR 4509 |
EU:C:2005:327 |
6(2) |
|
137 |
522/03 |
Scania Finance v Rockinger |
[2005] ECR 8639 |
EU:C:2005:606 |
34(2) |
|
138 |
73/04 |
Klein v Rhodos |
[2005] ECR 8667 |
EU:C:2005:607 |
20(1) |
|
139 |
3/05 |
Verdoliva v V d Hoeven |
[2006] ECR 1579 |
EU:C:2006:l 13 |
43 |
|
140 |
234/04 |
Kapferer v Schlank |
[2006] ECR 2585 |
EU:C:2006:178 |
15 |
|
141 |
343/04 |
Land Oberösterreich v CEZ |
[2006] ECR 4557 |
EU:C:2006:330 |
22(1) |
|
142 |
4/03 |
GAT v LuK |
[2006] ECR 6509 |
EU:C:2006:457 |
22(4) |
|
143 |
539/03 |
Roche Nederland v Primus |
[2006] ECR 6535 |
EU:C:2006:458 |
6(1) |
|
144 |
103/05 |
Reisch Montage v Kiesel |
[2006] ECR 6827 |
EU:C:2006:471 |
6(1) |
|
145 |
283/05 |
AS ML v SEMIS |
[2006] ECR 12041 |
EU:C:2006:787 |
34(2) |
|
146 |
292/05 |
Lechouritou v Germany |
[2007] ECR 1519 |
EU:C:2007:102 |
1 |
|
147 |
386/05 |
Color Drack v Lexx Int’l |
[2007] ECR 3699 |
EU:C:2007:262 |
5(1) |
|
148 |
98/06 |
Freeport v Arnoldsson |
[2007] ECR 8319 |
EU:C:2007:595 |
6(1) |
|
149 |
463/06 |
FBTO v Odenbreit |
[2007] ECR 11321 |
EU:C:2007:792 |
11(2) |
|
150 |
14/07 |
Weiss v Handelskammer |
[2008] ECR 3367 |
EU:C:2008:264 |
34(2) |
|
151 |
462/06 |
GlaxoSmithKlein v Rouard |
[2008] ECR 3965 |
EU:C:2008:299 |
6(1), 18-20 |
|
152 |
372/07 |
Hassett v SE Health Board |
[2008] ECR 7403 |
EU:C:2008:534 |
22(2) |
|
153 |
185/07 |
Allianz v West Tankers Inc |
[2009] ECR 663 |
EU:C:2009:69 |
K2)(d) |
|
154 |
339/07 |
Seagon v Deko Marty |
[2009] ECR 767 |
EU:C:2009:83 |
K2)(b) |
|
155 |
394/07 |
Gambazzi v Daimler |
[2009] ECR 2563 |
EU:C:2009:219 |
34(1) |
|
156 |
533/07 |
Falco v Weller-Lindhorst |
[2009] ECR 3327 |
EU:C:2009:257 |
5(1) |
|
157 |
167/08 |
Draka v Omnipol |
[2009] ECR 3277 |
EU:C:2009:263 |
43(1) |
|
158 |
420/07 |
Apostolides v Orams |
[2009] ECR 3571 |
EU:C:2009:271 |
22(1), 32, 34, 38(1) |
|
159 |
180/06 |
Ilsinger v Schlank & Schick |
[2009] ECR 3961 |
EU:C:2009:303 |
15(1) |
|
160 |
111/08 |
SCT Industrie v Alpenblume |
[2009] ECR 5565 |
EU:C:2009:419 |
K2)(b) |
|
161 |
204/08 |
Rehder v Air Baltic |
[2009] ECR 6073 |
EU:C:2009:439 |
5(1) |
|
162 |
189/08 |
Zuid-Chimie v Phillipo's |
[2009] ECR 6917 |
EU:C:2009:475 |
5(3) |
|
163 |
292/08 |
German Graphics |
[2009] ECR 8421 |
EU:C:2009:544 |
K2)(b) |
|
164 |
347/08 |
Vorarlberger v WG V |
[2009] ECR 8661 |
EU:C:2009:561 |
11(2) |
|
165 |
381/08 |
Car Trim v KeySafety |
[2010] ECR 1255 |
EU:C:2010:90 |
5(1) |
|
166 |
19/09 |
Wood Floor Solutions |
[2010] ECR 2121 |
EU:C:2O1O:I37 |
5(1) |
|
167 |
533/08 |
TNT Express v AXA |
[2010] ECR 4107 |
EU:C:2010:243 |
67 |
|
168 |
111/09 |
Ceskd Podnikatelska v Bilas |
[2010] ECR 4545 |
EU:C:2010:290 |
8-14, 26 |
|
169 |
585/08 |
Pammer v Karl Schluter |
[2010] ECR 12527 |
EU:C:2010:740 |
15 |
|
170 |
144/09 |
Hotel Alpenhof v Heller |
[2010] ECR 12527 |
EU:C:2010:740 |
15 |
|
171 |
144/10 |
B VG v JP Morgan Chase |
[2011] ECR 3961 |
EU:C:2011:300 |
22(2) |
|
172 |
87/10 |
Electrosteel v Edit Centro |
[2011] ECR 4987 |
EU:C:2011:375 |
5(1) |
|
173 |
139/10 |
Prism v Van der Meer |
[2011] ECR 9511 |
EU:C:2011:653 |
45 |
|
174 |
406/09 |
Realchemie v Bayer |
[2011] ECR 9773 |
EU:C:2011:668 |
1 |
|
175 |
161/10 |
eDate Advertising v X |
[2011] ECR 10269 |
EU:C:2011:685 |
5(3) |
|
Seq: |
Case: |
Parties: |
Report: |
Neutral ref |
Lugano Article no: |
|
176 |
509/09 |
Martinez v MGN |
[2011] ECR 10269 |
EU:C:2011:685 |
5(3) |
|
177 |
327/10 |
Hypotecni Banka v Lindner |
[2011] ECR 11453 |
EU:C:20l 1:745 |
16(2), 59 |
|
178 |
145/10 |
Painer v Standard Verlags |
[2011] ECR 12553 |
EU:C:2011:798 |
6(1) |
(from the end of 2011 the European Court Reports were discontinued; official publication was digital
|
only) |
|||||
|
179 |
292/10 |
G v de Visser |
Mar 15,2012 |
EU:C:2012:142 |
5(3) |
|
180 |
213/10 |
F-Tex v Jade cloud- Vi I ma |
Apr 19, 2012 |
EU:C:2012:215 |
l(2)(b) |
|
181 |
523/10 |
Wintersteiger v Products 4 U |
Apr 19,2012 |
EU:C:2012:220 |
5(3) |
|
182 |
514/10 |
Wolf Naturprodukte v Sewar |
Jun 21, 2012 |
EU:C:2012:367 |
63 |
|
183 |
616/10 |
Solvay v Honeywell |
Jul 12,2012 |
EU:C:2012:445 |
22(4), 6(1), 31 |
|
184 |
154/11 |
Mahamdia v Algeria |
Jul 19,2012 |
EU:C:2012:491 |
18(2), 21(2) |
|
185 |
619/10 |
Trade Agency v Seramico |
Sep 6,2012 |
EU:C:2012:531 |
34(1), 34(2), 45, 54 |
|
186 |
190/11 |
Miihlleitner v Yusufi |
Sep 6,2012 |
EU:C:2012:542 |
15(1) |
|
187 |
173/11 |
Football Dataco v Sportradar |
Oct 18, 2012 |
EU:C:2012:642 |
5(3) |
|
188 |
133/11 |
Folien Fischer v Ritrama |
Oct 25,2012 |
EU:C:2012:664 |
5(3) |
|
189 |
456/11 |
GA V v Samskip |
Nov 13,2012 |
EU:C:2012:719 |
32,33 |
|
190 |
543/10 |
Ref comp v AXA |
Feb 7,2013 |
EU:C:2013:62 |
23 |
|
191 |
419/11 |
Ceskä spofitelna v Feichter |
Mar 14, 2013 |
EU:C:2013:165 |
5, 15(1) |
|
192 |
645/11 |
Sapir v Land Berlin |
Apr 11,2013 |
EU:C:2013:228 |
1,6(1) |
|
193 |
228/11 |
Melzer v MF Global |
May 16, 2013 |
EU:C:2013:305 |
5(3) |
|
194 |
144/12 |
Goldbet Sport v Sperindeo |
Jun 13,2013 |
EU:C:2013:393 |
24 |
|
195 |
147/12 |
ÖFAB r Koot |
Jul 18,2013 |
EU:C:2013:490 |
5(1), 5(3) |
|
196 |
49/12 |
HMRC v Sunico ApS |
Sep 12, 2013 |
EU:C:2013:545 |
1 |
|
197 |
157/12 |
Salzgitter v Laminorul |
Sep 26, 2013 |
EU:C:2013:597 |
34(5) |
|
198 |
170/12 |
Pinckney v Mediatech |
Oct 3,2013 |
EU:C:2013:635 |
5(3) |
|
199 |
386/12 |
Re Schneider |
Oct 3,2013 |
EU:C:2013:663 |
l(2)(a), 22(1) |
|
200 |
218/12 |
Emrek v Sabranovic |
Oct 17,2013 |
EU:C:2013:666 |
15(1) |
|
201 |
519/12 |
OPT Bank v Hochtief |
Oct 17,2013 |
EU:C:2013:674 |
l(2)(b), 5(3) |
|
202 |
478/12 |
Malefic v lastndnute.com |
Nov 14,2013 |
EU:C:2013:735 |
16(1) |
|
203 |
469/12 |
Krejci Lager v Olbrich |
Nov 14,2013 |
EU:C:2013:788 |
5(1) |
|
204 |
9/12 |
Corman-Collins v La Maison |
Dec 19, 2013 |
EU:C:2013:860 |
2, 5(1) |
|
205 |
452/12 |
Nipponkoa v Inter-Zuid |
Dec 19, 2013 |
EU:C:2013:858 |
67 |
|
206 |
45/13 |
Kainz v Pantherwerke |
Jan 16, 2014 |
EU:C:2014:7 |
5(3) |
|
207 |
1/13 |
Cartier Parfums v Ziegler |
Feb 27, 2014 |
EU:C:2014:109 |
24, 27 |
|
208 |
548/12 |
Brogsitter v Montres de N |
Mar 13,2014 |
EU:C:2014:148 |
5(1), 5(3) |
|
209 |
438/12 |
Weber v Weber |
Apr 3, 2014 |
EU:C:2O14:2I2 |
22(1) |
|
210 |
387/12 |
Hi Hotel v Spoering |
Apr 3, 2014 |
EU:C:2O14:2I5 |
5(3) |
|
211 |
360/12 |
Coty Germany v First Note |
Jun 5, 2014 |
EU:C:2O14:13I8 |
5(3) |
|
212 |
157/13 |
Nickel & Goeldner v Kintra |
Sep 4,2014 |
EU:C:2O14:2I45 |
l(2)(b),67 |
|
213 |
112/13 |
Av B |
Sep 11,2014 |
EU:C:2O14:2I95 |
24 |
|
214 |
302/13 |
fly LAL v Air Baltic Corp |
Oct 23, 2014 |
EU:C:2014:2319 |
1,22(2), 34(1) |
|
215 |
295/13 |
HvHK |
Dec 4,2014 |
EU:C:2014:2410 |
l(2)(b) |
|
216 |
445/13 |
Hejduk v EnergieAgentur |
Jan 22, 2015 |
EU:C:2014:28, |
5(3) |
|
217 |
375/13 |
Kolassa v Barclays Bank |
Jan 28, 2015 |
EU:C:2015:37, |
15, 5(1), 5(3) |
|
218 |
536/13 |
Gazprom v Lithuania |
May 13, 2015 |
EU:C:2015:316 |
K2)(d) |
|
219 |
322/14 |
El Majdoub v CarsontheWeb |
May 21, 2015 |
EU:C:2015:334 |
23 |
|
220 |
352/13 |
CCC Hydrogen Peroxide |
May 21,2015 |
EU:C:2015:335 |
5(3), 6(1), 23 |
|
221 |
681/13 |
Diageo Brands v Simiramida |
Jul 16,2015 |
EU:C:2015:471 |
34(1) |
|
222 |
4/14 |
Bolle: v Wiertz |
Sep 9,2015 |
EU:C:2015:563 |
1(2), 49 |
|
223 |
47/14 |
Holterman Ferho v Spies |
Sep 10, 2015 |
EU:C:2015:474 |
5(1), 5(3), 18-21 |
|
224 |
523/14 |
Aertsen v VSB |
Oct 22, 2015 |
EU:C:2015:722 |
1,27, 30 |
|
225 |
605/14 |
Коти v Коти |
Dec 17, 2015 |
EU:C:2015:833 |
22(1) |
|
226 |
297/14 |
Hobohm v Kampik |
Dec 23,2015 |
EU:C:2015:844 |
15, 16 |
|
227 |
521/14 |
SOVAGv If |
Jan 21,2016 |
EU:C:2016:41 |
6(2) |
|
228 |
175/15 |
Taser v SC Gate 4 Business |
Mar 17,2016 |
EU:C:2016:176 |
24 |
|
229 |
366/13 |
Profit Investment SIM v Ossi |
Apr 20, 2016 |
EU:C:2016:282 |
5(1), 6(1), 23 |
|
230 |
572/14 |
Austro-Mechana v Amazon |
Apr 21, 2016 |
EU:C:2016:286 |
5(3) |
|
231 |
559/14 |
Meroni v Recoletos |
May 25, 2016 |
EU:C:2016:349 |
34(1) |
|
232 |
12/15 |
Universal Music v Schilling |
Jun 16, 2016 |
EU:C:2016:449 |
5(3) |
|
233 |
70/15 |
Lebek r Domino |
Jul 7, 2016 |
EU:C:2016:524 |
34(2) |
|
234 |
222/15 |
Höszig v Alstom |
Jul 7,2016 |
EU:C:2016:525 |
23 |
|
235 |
196/15 |
Granarolo v Ambrosi Emmi |
Jul 14, 2016 |
EU:C:2016:559 |
5(1), 5(3) |
|
236 |
230/15 |
Brite Strike v Brite Strike |
Jul 14, 2016 |
EU:C:2016:560 |
22(4), 71 |
|
237 |
102/15 |
Gazdasägi v Siemens |
Jul 28, 2016 |
EU:C:2016:607 |
1 |
|
238 |
185/15 |
Konstanjevec F&S Leasing |
Oct 12,2016 |
EU:C:2016:763 |
6(3) |
|
239 |
417/15 |
Schmidt v Schmidt |
Nov 16, 2016 |
EU:C:2016:881 |
22(1), 5(1 )(a) |
|
240 |
618/15 |
Concurrence v Samsung |
Dec 21, 2016 |
EU:C:2016:976 |
5(3) |
|
241 |
551/15 |
Pula Parking v Tederahn |
Mar 9, 2017 |
EU:C:2017:193 |
1 |
|
242 |
29/16 |
Hanse Yacht v Port D Hirer |
May 4, 2017 |
EU:C:2017:343 |
27, 30(1) |
|
243 |
67/17 |
Iliev v Ilieva |
Jun 14, 2017 |
EU:C:2017:459 |
K2)(a) |
|
244 |
249/16 |
Kareda v Benkö |
Jun 15, 2017 |
EU:C:2017:472 |
5(1) |
|
245 |
436/16 |
Levent is v Maicon |
Jun 28, 2017 |
EU:C:2017:497 |
23 |
|
246 |
368/16 |
Asserts Havn v Navigators |
Jul 13,2017 |
EU:C:2017:546 |
13, 14 |
|
247 |
433/16 |
BMW v Acacia |
Jul 13,2017 |
EU:C:2017:550 |
24, 5(3) |
|
248 |
340/16 |
KA BEG v MM A |
Jul 20, 2017 |
EU:C:2017:576 |
9(1), 11(2) |
|
249 |
168/16 |
Nogueira v Crewlink |
Sep 14, 2017 |
EU:C:2017:688 |
19(2) |
|
250 |
169/16 |
Moreno Osacar v Ryanair |
Sep 14, 2017 |
EU:C:2017:688 |
19(2) |
|
251 |
24/16 |
Nintendo v BigBen |
Sep 27, 2017 |
EU:C:2017:724 |
6(1) |
|
252 |
341/16 |
Hanssen v Prast-Knipping |
Oct 5, 2017 |
EU:C:2017:738 |
2, 22(4) |
|
253 |
194/16 |
Bolagsupplysningen v SH |
Oct 17, 2017 |
EU:C:2017:766 |
5(3) |
|
254 |
641/16 |
Tiinkers France v Expert |
Nov 9, 2017 |
EU:C:2017:847 |
K2)(b) |
|
255 |
649/16 |
Valach v Waldviertler Bank |
Dec 20,2017 |
EU:C:2017:986 |
K2)(b) |
|
256 |
467/16 |
Schlömp v Schwäbisch Hall |
Dec 20,2017 |
EU:C:2017:993 |
27, 30 |
|
257 |
498/16 |
Schrems v Facebook |
Jan 25, 2018 |
EU:C:2018:37 |
15, 16 |
|
258 |
106/17 |
Hofsoe v LVM |
Jan 31,2018 |
EU:C:2018:50 |
9(1), 11(2) |
|
259 |
274/16 |
flightright v Air Nostrum |
Mar 7, 2018 |
EU:C:2018:160 |
5(1) |
|
260 |
560/16 |
E. ON v Dedouch |
Mar 7, 2018 |
EU:C:2018:167 |
22(2) |
|
261 |
64/17 |
Saey Home v Lusavouga |
Mar 8, 2018 |
EU:C:2018:I73 |
23, 5(1) |
|
262 |
306/17 |
Nothartova v Boldizsär |
May 31,2018 |
EU:C:2018:360 |
6(3) |
|
263 |
1/17 |
Petronas v Guida |
Jun 21, 2018 |
EU:C:2018:478 |
20(2) |
|
264 |
27/17 |
fly LA L- Lithuanian A irlines |
Jul 5,2018 |
EU:C:2018:533 |
5(3), 5(5) |
|
265 |
88/17 |
Zürich v Abnormal Load |
Jul 11,2018 |
EU:C:2018:558 |
5(1) |
|
266 |
304/17 |
Löber v Barclays Bank |
Sep 12, 2018 |
EU:C:2018:701 |
5(3) |
|
267 |
337/17 |
Feniks v Azteca |
Oct 4,2018 |
EU:C:2018:805 |
5(1) |
|
268 |
379/17 |
Re Al Bosco |
Oct 4,2018 |
EU:C:2018:806 |
38 |
|
269 |
595/17 |
Apple v MJA |
Oct 24, 2018 |
EU:C:2018:854 |
23 |
|
270 |
308/17 |
Greece v Kuhn |
Nov 15,2018 |
EU:C:2018:911 |
1 |
|
271 |
386/17 |
Liberate v Grigorescu |
Jan 16,2019 |
EU:C:2019:24 |
5(2), 27, 35(3) |
|
272 |
535/17 |
NK v BNP Paribas |
Feb 6,2019 |
EU:C:2019:96 |
l(2)(b) |
|
Seq: |
Case: |
Parties: |
Report: |
Neutral ref |
Lugano Article no: |
|
273 |
630/17 |
Milivojevic v Raiffeisenbank |
Feb 14, 2019 |
EU:C:2OI9:123 |
15(1), 22(1) |
|
274 |
579/17 |
BUAK >' Gradbenistvo |
Feb 28, 2019 |
EU:C:2OI9:162 |
1(1), 1(2), 53 |
|
275 |
603/17 |
Bosworth v Arcadia |
Apr 11,2019 |
EU:C:2OI9:31O |
18-21 |
|
276 |
464/18 |
ZX v Ryanair |
Apr 11,2019 |
EU:C:2019:311 |
5(5), 24 |
|
277 |
694/17 |
Pillar v Hildur Arnadottir |
May 2, 2019 |
EU:C:2019:345 |
15 |
|
278 |
25/18 |
Kerr v Postnov |
May 8,2019 |
EU:C:2019:376 |
5(1) |
|
279 |
361/18 |
Weil v Guläcsi |
Jun 6,2019 |
EU:C:2019:473 |
1(1), l(2)(a), 54 |
|
280 |
722/17 |
Reitbauer v Casamassima |
Jul 10,2019 |
EU:C:2019:577 |
22(1), 22(5) |
|
281 |
451/18 |
Tibor-Trans v DA F Trucks |
Jul 29, 2019 |
EU:C:2019:635 |
5(3) |
|
282 |
347/18 |
Suivant v Fiermonte |
Sep 4,2019 |
EU:C:2019:661 |
53 |
|
283 |
47/18 |
Skarb Pänstwa v Riel |
Sep 18, 2019 |
EU:C:2019:754 |
l(2)(b) |
|
284 |
208/18 |
Petruchovä г FIBO |
Oct 3,2019 |
EU:C:2019:825 |
15(1) |
|
285 |
213/18 |
Guaitoli v easyjet |
Nov 7, 2019 |
EU:C:2019:927 |
5(1) |
|
286 |
200/19 |
INA v Ljubljanska Bank |
Nov 19, 2019 |
EU:C:2019:985 |
5(1), 5(5) |
|
287 |
421/18 |
Avocats de Dinant v JN |
Dec 5,2019 |
EU:C: 1029:1053 |
1,5(1) |
|
288 |
606/19 |
flightright v Iberia |
Feb 13, 2020 |
EU:C:2020:101 |
5(1) |
|
288 |
215/18 |
Kràlovà v Primera Air |
Mar 26, 2020 |
EU:C:2020:235 |
5(1) |
|
290 |
500/18 |
AU v Reliant co |
Apr 2, 2020 |
EU:C:2020:264 |
15 |
|
291 |
641/18 |
LG v Rina SpA |
May 7, 2020 |
EU:C:2020:349 |
KD |
|
292 |
267/19 |
Parking v Sawal |
May 7, 2020 |
EU:C:2020:351 |
KD |
|
293 |
343/19 |
Vf K v Volkswagen |
Jul 9, 2020 |
EU:C:2020:534 |
5(3) |
|
294 |
73/19 |
Belgium v Movie |
Jul 16, 2020 |
EU:C:2020:568 |
KD |
|
295 |
186/19 |
Supreme Site Svcs v SHAPE |
Sep 3, 2020 |
EU:C:2020:638 |
KD, 22(5) |
|
296 |
433/19 |
Ellmes Property v SP |
Nov 11,2020 |
EU:C:2020:900 |
22(1), 5(1) |
|
297 |
519/19 |
Ryanair v Delay Fix |
Nov 18,2020 |
EU:C:2020:933 |
23 |
|
298 |
59/19 |
Wikingerhof v Booking, com |
Nov 24, 2020 |
EU:C:2020:950 |
5(1), 5(3) |
|
299 |
774/19 |
AB v Personal Exchange |
Dec 10, 2020 |
EU:C:2020:1015 |
15(1) |