Findings
This section provides an overview of the needs for linguistic mediation in the 2011 disaster that participants mentioned at interview. Other linguistic needs, of course, may have existed. The purpose of this section is not to come up with an exhaustive inventory, but rather to point to areas where translation technologies made a contribution in the 2011 disaster or could make a contribution in any future disasters in Japan.
Table 1 details the specific qualitative data revealed to the researcher at interview and organises these data in a typology of linguistic mediation needs. The data can be summarised under five main findings: a need for linguistic mediation - both translation and interpreting - was observed in the 2011 disaster; the greatest need for such mediation was to allow foreign nationals to develop ‘situation awareness’; a recurring theme in participant accounts was the need for the mediation of live speech by other people in the disaster setting who offered their language skills in a voluntary capacity; significant amounts of mediation were carried out under the auspices of television networks and local government offices; problematising linguistic mediation in the 2011 disaster revealed not just an overall lack of mediation efforts but also problems with the consistency and speed of the translation that was carried out. In these findings, the technical term ‘situation awareness’ may be new to the reader. Situation awareness is a concept used in the study of emergency response to talk about how people individually and collectively gather and analyse information in complex and changing circumstances in order to understand and cope with a situation (Endsley and Garland 2000, Vieweg 2012).
Each finding developed from the data in Table 1 will now be explained in more detail.
Table 1. Linguistic mediation needs in the 2011 disaster identified by participants in this study
|
Topic: | Mode: | Mediators: | Locus: | Problem: |
||||
|
Warning about the disaster |
||||
|
• Automated early warning systems |
|
• Staff of subscribing networks |
|
• Lack of linguistic mediation of TV and municipal warnings |
|
• Maps displayed on emergency news broadcasts and websites |
• Electronic text |
• Staff of TV networks |
• TV networks |
• Lack of linguistic mediation of captions, colour coding of warnings only explained in Japanese |
|
Instructing people how to respond |
||||
|
• General public address announcements (evacuations, delays, explaining power-saving) |
• Live speech |
|
|
|
|
• Controlled evacuation notices (not over pub be address system) |
• Live speech |
• Staff of the parks and public facilities |
|
• Limited language abilities of staff |
|
• Instructions from Japanese local authorities to international emergency responders |
• Live speech |
• Volunteer interpreters (professional and nonprofessional) |
|
• Cultural and political barriers |
|
• Instructing volunteers in response and recovery tasks |
• Live speech |
|
• Homes, businesses, and streets in the disaster zone |
• Limited language abilities of local organisers and foreign volunteers |
|
Developing situation awareness' in the disaster |
||||
|
• Confirming safety with and reporting location of foreign nationals to local authorities |
• Live speech |
|
|
|
|
• Content of news broadcasts on TV and streamed online (especially areas hit, by what, and fatalities and missing) |
|
|
|
|
Table 1. (Continued)
|
Topic: I Mode: 1 Mediators: 1 Locus: 1 Problem: |
||||
|
• Content of press conferences |
|
|
• Government offices |
|
|
• Public transport timetables and routes, especially for evacuating |
|
|
• Municipal helpdesks and helplines |
|
|
• Where to go for emergency supplies, opening, stocking and rationing at stores |
|
• Other foreign nationals |
• Homes, businesses, and streets in the disaster zone |
• Information updated constantly |
|
• Explaining the Japanese seismic intensity scale |
|
|
• Municipal offices |
• Cultural barriers |
|
• Reporting rates of radioactivity in particular geographic areas and ris er routes to see water contamination |
|
|
|
|
|
• Nuclear technology and its operation |
• Live speech |
• Academic experts |
|
|
|
• Food labels, especially places of origin |
• Printed text |
• Other foreign nationals |
• Supermarkets, restaurants |
• Lack of linguistic mediation |
|
• Content of Japanese ministerial websites |
• Electronic text |
• Governmental staff |
• Japanese ministries |
|
|
Administering the disaster |
||||
|
• Forms and procedures required to become a volunteer |
|
|
• Homes, businesses, and streets in the disaster zone |
• Lack of linguistic mediation |
|
• Forms and procedures required to make claims for insurance, rebuilding, returning home, etc. |
|
|
• Municipal helpdesks and helplines |
|
|
Supporting others through the disaster |
||||
|
• Giving condolences or showing empathy appropriately |
• Live speech |
• Foreign volunteers |
• Homes and bus messes in tire disaster zone |
• Limited language abilities of foreign volunteers |
|
• Twitter messages of support from around the world |
• Electronic text |
• Professional translators working in a voluntary capacity |
• Web-based human translation platform headquartered in Tokyo |
• Significant time and resources required to synthesise message platform and translation platform |