Lung Imaging in ARDS
Silvia Coppola, Sara Froio, and Davide Chiumello
Introduction
The definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has been recently revised with the new Berlin definition [1]. According to this latest definition, the diagnosis is based on the onset of the hypoxemia and of bilateral radiological opacities within 1 week. Three mutually exclusive categories of ARDS based on the degree of hypoxemia were identified (mild, <300 mmHg PaO2/FiO2 > 200 mmHg; moderate, <200 mmHg PaO2/FiO2>100 mmHg; severe, PaO2/FiO2 <100 mmHg with a positive end-expiratory pressure >5 cmH2O) associated with increased mortality and associated with median length of mechanical ventilation in survivors. The new definition updated the following concepts:
- • The specific time frame identifying the acute onset as “ARDS developing within 1 week of a known clinical insult or new/worsening respiratory symptoms”
- • The origin of edema judging ARDS, a respiratory failure not fully explained by cardiac failure or fluid overload
- • The chest radiological criterion specifying that it should include bilateral opacities not fully explained by effusion, lobar lung collapse on chest radiograph, or on CT scan if available
S. Coppola • S. Froio
Dipartimento di Anestesia, Rianimazione ed Emergenza Urgenza, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda-Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy e-mail: This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it
D. Chiumello (*)
Director of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Services, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Department of Scienze della Salute, University of Milan, Milan, Italy e-mail: This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it
© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017 D. Chiumello (ed.), Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-41852-0_10
Table 10.1 Lung imaging techniques: clinical role and technical limitations
|
Imaging technique |
Clinical role |
Technical limitations |
|
X-ray |
Lung assessment |
Poor contrast diagnostic resolution Quality of the exam affected by ICU conditions Radiation exposure |
|
Computed tomography |
Lung assessment Lung recruitment Overdistension evaluation Lung perfusion analysis |
Risk of critically ill patient’s transport Radiation exposure |
|
Lung ultrasound |
Lung assessment Lung recruitment |
Operator-dependent technique Physical shape such as obesity, subcutaneous emphysema, large rib cage |
|
Positron emission tomography |
Lung assessment |
Risk of critically ill patient’s transport Time-consuming Short half-life of tracers |
|
Electrical impedance tomography |
Lung assessment Lung recruitment Lung perfusion analysis |
Indirect acquisition Detection of relative changes in functionally active structure |
|
Magnetic resonance imaging |
Lung assessment |
Risk of critically ill patient’s transport Required dedicated assistance, monitoring, and devices Time-consuming |
From a pathophysiological point of view, ARDS can be considered an acute, diffuse inflammatory lung injury that leads to increased pulmonary vascular permeability, increased lung weight, and loss of aerated lung tissue. In this context of parenchymal abnormalities, lung imaging plays a role in the diagnosis and followup and can provide prognostic information.
Therefore, the aim of this chapter is to summarize the role of the different imaging techniques that have been developed throughout the years to better understand ARDS and to monitor ARDS patients. In particular we would focus on the role of each lung imaging technique in the diagnosis and in the evaluation over the time of lung recruitment, overdistension, and perfusion (Table 10.1).